Republican compares Arizona law to Gestapo

Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.) ripped into the new Arizona immigration law today, comparing it to Nazi Germany.

"This law of 'frontier justice' – where law enforcement officials are required to stop anyone based on 'reasonable suspicion' that they may be in the country illegally – is reminiscent of a time during World War II when the Gestapo in Germany stopped people on the street and asked for their papers without probable cause," Mack said in a statement.
Mack (R) compares Ariz. law to Nazi Germany - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

:eusa_eh:
There are similarities. Do you think he would be making this statement if he were running for the Senate as a Republican instead of an Independent?

Just for the record, it is Gov. Charlie Christ who is running for the Senate as an independent not Connie Mack.

Not that it matters, just clarifying the record.

Immie
 
Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.) ripped into the new Arizona immigration law today, comparing it to Nazi Germany.

"This law of 'frontier justice' – where law enforcement officials are required to stop anyone based on 'reasonable suspicion' that they may be in the country illegally – is reminiscent of a time during World War II when the Gestapo in Germany stopped people on the street and asked for their papers without probable cause," Mack said in a statement.
Mack (R) compares Ariz. law to Nazi Germany - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

:eusa_eh:


ROFLMNAO...

Advancing the erroneous conclusion of a Progressive as proof of something.

Mack's an idiot... Nothing new there and that he'd misrepresent the Arizona Law hardly provides any evidence to the contrary.

Arizona Law enforcement, like ALL US Law enforcement is required to act where they have reasonable suspicion that a crime is being committed...

Being brown is not a crime; looking like a Mexican isn't a crime; BEING a Mexican isn't a crime and there's NOTHING in the Arizone law which states that it is; thus there is NOTHING in the Arizona law which provides that Arizona cops can stop or arrest anyone because of their race, or the color of their skin.

Assertions that there IS something in the Arizona law which does so, is a FRAUD... Mack is such a fraud; as are ALL PROGRESSIVES; be they D or R.

And Mack represents *ME*...and he will get an eye full from *ME*
 
She's under the delusion illegal immigrants and the libs who love them will vote for her.
 
Can you say not losing elections. No, thought you couldn't. It's all right. We have many good Democrats to replace the sane Republican's you wingnuts through out.
 
Can you say not losing elections. No, thought you couldn't. It's all right. We have many good Democrats to replace the sane Republican's you wingnuts through out.

ok Rocks i asked you this in another thread was ignored so i will ask here....if the feds are not doing THEIR job....what should the States do?...
 
Well hello Connie. I see you didn't read the bill and you're just spewing hyperbole. OK... no problem... we already figured that out.

Now kindly GO FUCK YOURSELF!
 
Illegal immigrants are criminals in our Country and they know it! They are not Jews in Nazi Germany buy a long shot or Jews who came here legally. The Jewish community should be outraged by this sick and twisted progressive Marxist/Fascist anology that compares them to the foreign domestic invaders of our Country by criminal subversives. If you or anyone supports the continued presence of illegal subversives who have placed themselves above our laws to undermine them and our Country and support the continued invasion of our Country then you are anti-American enemy subversives guilty of treason against our Constitutional Republic! :twisted:
 
Illegal immigrants are criminals in our Country and they know it! They are not Jews in Nazi Germany buy a long shot or Jews who came here legally. The Jewish community should be outraged by this sick and twisted progressive Marxist/Fascist anology that compares them to the foreign domestic invaders of our Country by criminal subversives. If you or anyone supports the continued presence of illegal subversives who have placed themselves above our laws to undermine them and our Country and support the continued invasion of our Country then you are anti-American enemy subversives guilty of treason against our Constitutional Republic! :twisted:
 
Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.) ripped into the new Arizona immigration law today, comparing it to Nazi Germany.

"This law of 'frontier justice' – where law enforcement officials are required to stop anyone based on 'reasonable suspicion' that they may be in the country illegally – is reminiscent of a time during World War II when the Gestapo in Germany stopped people on the street and asked for their papers without probable cause," Mack said in a statement.
Mack (R) compares Ariz. law to Nazi Germany - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

:eusa_eh:

So now you think Republicans are a source of moral authority?
Make up your mind, sleazebag.


the point is: if even sleazebag immoral republicans think this law is immoral, that is really saying something!:lol:
 
Illegal immigrants are criminals in our Country and they know it! They are not Jews in Nazi Germany buy a long shot or Jews who came here legally. The Jewish community should be outraged by this sick and twisted progressive Marxist/Fascist anology that compares them to the foreign domestic invaders of our Country by criminal subversives. If you or anyone supports the continued presence of illegal subversives who have placed themselves above our laws to undermine them and our Country and support the continued invasion of our Country then you are anti-American enemy subversives guilty of treason against our Constitutional Republic! :twisted:

many hispanic Americans ARE citizens of this country, and allowing a policeman to stop them and ask them for their papers with no cause other than the color of their skin or their accent, that certainly IS reminiscent of Nazy Germany.
 
Illegal immigrants are criminals in our Country and they know it! They are not Jews in Nazi Germany buy a long shot or Jews who came here legally. The Jewish community should be outraged by this sick and twisted progressive Marxist/Fascist anology that compares them to the foreign domestic invaders of our Country by criminal subversives. If you or anyone supports the continued presence of illegal subversives who have placed themselves above our laws to undermine them and our Country and support the continued invasion of our Country then you are anti-American enemy subversives guilty of treason against our Constitutional Republic! :twisted:

many hispanic Americans ARE citizens of this country, and allowing a policeman to stop them and ask them for their papers with no cause other than the color of their skin or their accent, that certainly IS reminiscent of Nazy Germany.

McCain would disagree; It's not the color of your skin, you just have to look out for the cars that are "intentionally causing accidents on the freeway." Those are the ones with the illegals in...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpeoBRO6YVk]YouTube - McCain - Immigrants Intentionally Cause Accidents[/ame]
 
Illegal immigrants are criminals in our Country and they know it! They are not Jews in Nazi Germany buy a long shot or Jews who came here legally. The Jewish community should be outraged by this sick and twisted progressive Marxist/Fascist anology that compares them to the foreign domestic invaders of our Country by criminal subversives. If you or anyone supports the continued presence of illegal subversives who have placed themselves above our laws to undermine them and our Country and support the continued invasion of our Country then you are anti-American enemy subversives guilty of treason against our Constitutional Republic! :twisted:

many hispanic Americans ARE citizens of this country, and allowing a policeman to stop them and ask them for their papers with no cause other than the color of their skin or their accent, that certainly IS reminiscent of Nazy Germany.

McCain would disagree; It's not the color of your skin, you just have to look out for the cars that are "intentionally causing accidents on the freeway." Those are the ones with the illegals in...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpeoBRO6YVk]YouTube - McCain - Immigrants Intentionally Cause Accidents[/ame]

99,9% of all accidents could be eliminated by using bigger stop signs.
 
Illegal immigrants are criminals in our Country and they know it! They are not Jews in Nazi Germany buy a long shot or Jews who came here legally. The Jewish community should be outraged by this sick and twisted progressive Marxist/Fascist anology that compares them to the foreign domestic invaders of our Country by criminal subversives. If you or anyone supports the continued presence of illegal subversives who have placed themselves above our laws to undermine them and our Country and support the continued invasion of our Country then you are anti-American enemy subversives guilty of treason against our Constitutional Republic! :twisted:

many hispanic Americans ARE citizens of this country, and allowing a policeman to stop them and ask them for their papers with no cause other than the color of their skin or their accent, that certainly IS reminiscent of Nazy Germany.

An elephant is grey. A mouse is grey. Therefore a mouse is an elephant.:lol:
 
I just read a letter written by a lady that was born in Austria before the Nazi take over. They ( voted ) for themselves to have German rule. At first all thought that they did the right thing. The promise was broken.
THE NAZIS DID ALL THESE THINGS!
Took God out of the classroom ( replaced all crosses with pictures of Hitler )
Took over the education of all children
Started a youth corp
Took over private industry
Took over banks
Introduced work for all through ( public works projects ) working for the Nazi government
Handed ration books out, if you didn't work you didn't eat ( food stamps )
Controlled all media
Took away freedom of speech
Encouraged neighbors to inform on one another and quelled all assemblies
Introduced universal health care
Collected all firearms
WHEN THE WAR STARTED
Drafted all men that was thought fit to fight
Made all woman work jobs that the men had held ( Women in those days did not work outside of the home )
Through ( health care ) they took all people ( deemed ) unfit out of the towns for ( treatment ) they were never seen again
THE NAZIS DID MUCH WORSE AS WE ALL KNOW. ( BUT DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN )?
 
A little off topic. However, it is another front we are simultaneously under attack on by all progressive crooks in gov't, and our institutions....

Democrats Try To Lock Up Their Base

April 30, 2010 by Phyllis Schlafly

"You have to decide what your goals are." That's what the Democratic staffer who wrote the marriage penalty into Obama's Health Control Law told a Wall Street Journal reporter.

Indeed, the Democrats and their feminist allies have decided on one of their major goals. It is to increase the number of single moms by increasing the flow of taxpayer-paid incentives that subsidize the non-marriage lifestyle.

The plan also includes locking in this group's dependence on government and allegiance to the Democratic Party. The plan is conveniently set forth in a 60-page document called "Advancing the Economic Security of Unmarried Women" just published by John Podesta's leftwing think tank called Center for American Progress.

The Democrats know that 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Barack Obama in the 2008 election. It's obviously part their political game plan to reward that group and keep it in the Obama column.

The feminists, who have always been anti-marriage and very anti-fulltime-homemaker, consider it progress that women are now half the workforce and are major breadwinners for their children. As chief feminist Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in her 1977 tax-funded book Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, the concept of breadwinning husband and homemaking wife "must be eliminated."

When husband-breadwinner is eliminated, single moms look to Big Brother Government as provider. Democrats are glad to claim credit for facilitating the taxpayer subsidies.

The Podesta opus sets the stage for the Democrats' legislative proposals by asserting that our definition of family is "outdated, stuck in the 1950s notion of a nuclear family that excludes too many of today's nontraditional families." Redefining the word family has been a feminist goal ever since Gloria Steinem persuaded President Jimmy Carter to change the name of his White House Conference on "the Family" to "Families."

The Podesta document sets forth 83 pieces of congressional legislation that will funnel taxpayers' money to unmarried women. You can get the flavor and the message from the cutesy titles.

The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act would "particularly benefit" unmarried women because women hold three-quarters of jobs in the education and health services industry. The Unemployment Insurance Modernization Act would require expansion in eligibility and benefits to help women.

The Paycheck Fairness Act would "improve" the 1963 Equal Pay Act based on the falsehood that "women workers earn 77 cents for every dollar a comparable man makes." The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) would benefit lesbian and bisexual women.

The Living American Wage Act and the Working for Adequate Gains for Employment in Services (WAGES) Act would improve the pay of "traditionally female jobs" in child care, early childhood education, and health care. The Pathways Advancing Career Training (PACT) Act and the Strengthening Employment Clusters to Organize Regional Success (SECTORS) Act would give funding to states to provide training for and access to nontraditional high-wage jobs and careers for women.

The Family and Medical Leave Inclusion Act and the Family and Medical Leave Enhancement Act would expand the definition of family to allow more unmarried women to use the benefits of family-leave laws. These bills would include unmarried partners and same-sex spouses.

The Family Income to Respond to Significant Transitions (FIRST) Act and the Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave (FEPPLA) Act would give women paid family leave. The Healthy Families Act would require employers to provide paid sick days, which the document says would help women because "women are disproportionately affected" by not having paid sick days.

The Domestic Violence Leave Act and the Security and Financial Empowerment (SAFE) Act would make women eligible for leave for a variety of problems connected with alleged domestic violence.

The Starting Early, Starting Right Act would provide "high-quality" daycare. The Right Start Child Care and Education Act, the Helping Families Afford to Work Act, and the Balancing Act are all designed to provide cash and services to single moms.

The Earned Income Tax Credit is already worth up to $5,657 for a single parent with custody of three children. The Podesta report failed to mention that the Government Accountability Office reported that the IRS estimates that between 27 and 32 percent of EITC dollars are collected fraudulently.

The Democratic Congress repealed the essence of Republican welfare reform last year by providing bonuses to states that increase their spending on Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Single moms make up 90 percent of TANF recipients.

Even if all these 83 bills don't pass, plus others that give health care, housing and retirement subsidies, they illustrate the worldview of Obama Democrats and feminists. The bills also demonstrate how welfare, which was started by Lyndon Johnson primarily to help widows with young children, has in the hands of government ballooned into a spending monster.

Follow Eagle Forum on Twitter
 
Oxymoron there. "Good Democrats".

And yes I know Connie is a poorly named man. It's just funnier this way.
 
What "probable cause" is shown by the AZ law?

you do realize the constitution is talking about warrants, not stopping you on the street or in your car

and probable cause is most likely already defined in case law and/or statutory law in AZ...its not a bright line solid rule

True. But FIRST thing we have to convince these people of is that the FOURTH deals with Citizens, and the LAW...But to convince these people that illegals do NOT have rights as citizens under the Constitution as citizens have.

But then we are dealing with a mindset that want to bring TERRORISTS here to be tried under Civil LAW when they aren't citizens either. But in this case we are dealing with acts of WAR...and with illegals we are dealing with an invasion that Democrat/Progressive/Statists seek to want to pardon the invaders with citizenship and all for their VOTES.

Their *INTENT* is transparent as Hell.

I hope you see it?

I still don't understand what it is Democrats hope to gain from La Reconquista
 

Forum List

Back
Top