- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #81
So, Sitarro, you were the guy who would not accept responsibility and had an authority-figure issue. Sounds like you still do.
OK, having said that, problems do exist. (1) I am one who fights against the high-stakes testing, that teaches students testing strategies and leaves little time for more important matters. (2) We have far too many parents who will not accept the primary responsibility for the kids' education. (3) Folks like you want to be part of the problem not the solution, Sitarro.
Much of the educational theory of the last 30 years has been biased, research programmed to meet that bias, and then passed off as objective findings.
Fact: Piaget is dead, not wrong. Children begin conceptualizing at various ages and stages, thus not one pedagogy fits all.
Fact: Rote learning does have its place in education. Example: A spec ed math teacher and "teach" the students to "learn" the prime numbers to, say, 31 but creating a marching cadence that imprints those numbers into their mind. The kids may not know "why" they are prime but they know "which" are prime to certain level. The sheer act of memorization at the level has tremendous benefits for those kids' self-confidence.
We have a long way to go, and you don't help with your grieved rambling. Sitarro, run your mouth because that's your right, but start offering input and not crap.
OK, having said that, problems do exist. (1) I am one who fights against the high-stakes testing, that teaches students testing strategies and leaves little time for more important matters. (2) We have far too many parents who will not accept the primary responsibility for the kids' education. (3) Folks like you want to be part of the problem not the solution, Sitarro.
Much of the educational theory of the last 30 years has been biased, research programmed to meet that bias, and then passed off as objective findings.
Fact: Piaget is dead, not wrong. Children begin conceptualizing at various ages and stages, thus not one pedagogy fits all.
Fact: Rote learning does have its place in education. Example: A spec ed math teacher and "teach" the students to "learn" the prime numbers to, say, 31 but creating a marching cadence that imprints those numbers into their mind. The kids may not know "why" they are prime but they know "which" are prime to certain level. The sheer act of memorization at the level has tremendous benefits for those kids' self-confidence.
We have a long way to go, and you don't help with your grieved rambling. Sitarro, run your mouth because that's your right, but start offering input and not crap.
Last edited: