Republican Admits To Paying Male Prostitute But Says “I’m Not Gay”, LMAO!

[Woyzeck]

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

So what? haven't homosexuals been MARRIED and lived a family values life, then left their family because they REALIZED they would rather be a full fledged homosexual. you people and your, they parrot "family values" is just a real joke. You USE HOMSEXUALS as a weapon, that is why many people have a low opinion of them. BECAUSE OF YOU ALL

The reason homophobia exists is because of liberals using them for political points?

You're fucking retarded.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Phil Hinkle Says He's Not Gay After Paying For Prostitute | News One

In denial just like Haggard and Larry Craig.

: I think, technically, like if, if the girl did something to you and you didn't do it back, like, that's, you didn't really do anything.

-Corey from Sunnyvale Trailer Park

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Homosexuality is widely accepted at an all time high, he had nothing to lose by admitting his homosexuality.

Sure, except VOTES

 

[Sallow]

He's not gay. The male prostitutes this little conniebot frequents, however, are..

 

[Stephanie]

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

So what? haven't homosexuals been MARRIED and lived a family values life, then left their family because they REALIZED they would rather be a full fledged homosexual. you people and your, they parrot "family values" is just a real joke. You USE HOMSEXUALS as a weapon, that is why many people have a low opinion of them. BECAUSE OF YOU ALL

The reason homophobia exists is because of liberals using them for political points?

You're fucking retarded.

It sure doesn't HELP. when they post dumb threads like this one, and believe me there have MANY of them...
and fuck you too

 

[theHawk]

This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

Even if this perverted homosexual did parrot the "familiy values" lines, it makes him and him alone a hypocrit.

I take that back, you're still one too.

 

[uscitizen]

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

If the gay couple were 2 republican congressmen?

 

[uscitizen]

The Gay male prostitute was actually Coulter

 

[whitehall]

I thought the left was tolerant of homosexual behavior. Didn't Barney Frank and Gerry Studds set the bar high enough?

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

I thought the left was tolerant of homosexual behavior. Didn't Barney Frank and Gerry Studds set the bar high enough?

? The OP is a rightie you MORON

 

[Stephanie]

i thought the left was tolerant of homosexual behavior. Didn't barney frank and gerry studds set the bar high enough?

? The op is a rightie you moron

no he isn't.....ask him

 

[Political Junky]

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

In your addled brain.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm pretty sure murder, rape and pedophilia is a big no-no for everyone. I don't think anyone gets a pass due to their sexuality.

You're wrong about that.

Two rednecks beat a homo to death: front page news for months and even years

Two homo perverts rape, torture and murder an adolescent: It's on page 64 of Section D.

If they're both in the paper, they both were prosecuted presumably. No one's still advocating people being able to get away with things based on their sexuality.

I know your hobby is building strawmen, but I have to point out to you, they are very easy to knock down.

You seem to be implying with your "both in the paper" gambit that both received equal coverage. That's the ultimate in dishonesty. Major media outlets quashed the story of Jesse Dirkhising, who was raped, tortured and murdered by two homosexuals. On the other hand, coverage of the Mathew Sheppard murder and trial went on for many months. There were no media memorials for Jesse Dirkhising as there were for Mathew Sheppard.

Furthermore, one was prosecuted as a hate crime and the other was treated as ordinary murder, so they prosecution wasn't the same either.

The media have made it perfectly clear they aren't interested in the victims of murderous homosexuals.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

In your addled brain.

No, that's historical reality.

 

[Article 15]

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

Put the bottle down, dude.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

i thought the left was tolerant of homosexual behavior. Didn't barney frank and gerry studds set the bar high enough?

? The op is a rightie you moron

no he isn't.....ask him

I am a conservative, not a rightie nor lefty, but a *TRUE CONSERVATIVE* not to be confused with the far right imbeciles called the Tea Party and the corporate welfare loving Republican Party.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

These ass-clown Board liberals (which is to say the loud mouth braying jackasses; not all Board liberals qualify) wouldn't comment on President Obama's homosexuality if he turned up in a gay porn video with his tongue stuck down Barney Frank's throat.

The difference? He's a Democratic!

Everyone in this forum knows I am staunchly against homosexuality, you Republitards use homosexuality and homophobia as political weapons to get votes, look at Rick Perry for example you damn moron. If Obama was gay the Republitards and Tea Farties would be even more homophobic.

 

[Woyzeck]

You're wrong about that.

Two rednecks beat a homo to death: front page news for months and even years

Two homo perverts rape, torture and murder an adolescent: It's on page 64 of Section D.

If they're both in the paper, they both were prosecuted presumably. No one's still advocating people being able to get away with things based on their sexuality.

I know your hobby is building strawmen, but I have to point out to you, they are very easy to knock down.

You seem to be implying with your "both in the paper" gambit that both received equal coverage. That's the ultimate in dishonesty. Major media outlets quashed the story of Jesse Dirkhising, who was raped, tortured and murdered by two homosexuals. On the other hand, coverage of the Mathew Sheppard murder and trial went on for many months. There were no media memorials for Jesse Dirkhising as there were for Mathew Sheppard.

Furthermore, one was prosecuted as a hate crime and the other was treated as ordinary murder, so they prosecution wasn't the same either.

The media have made it perfectly clear they aren't interested in the victims of murderous homosexuals.

I'm still pretty sure this doesn't actually answer someone getting a free pass from rape and murder as you said here. Oh and here too, where you say the only way a liberal would object is if it happened in church.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm still pretty sure this doesn't actually answer someone getting a free pass from rape and murder as you said here. Oh and here too, where you say the only way a liberal would object is if it happened in church.

The press did give the two murderous homosexual perverts a free pass. None of the major news outlets even mentioned the case. Neither did any of the television news programs.

Also, can you quote a single liberal who objected to behavior of the two sadistic homosexual predators?

 

[Seawytch]

That's the only reason a liberal would object. Otherwise, it's not considered newsworthy.

I'm pretty sure murder, rape and pedophilia is a big no-no for everyone. I don't think anyone gets a pass due to their sexuality.

You're wrong about that.

Two rednecks beat a homo to death: front page news for months and even years

Two homo perverts rape, torture and murder an adolescent: It's on page 64 of Section D.

Both were heinous crimes deserving of the same degree of outrage AND media coverage. I doubt you will find ANYONE who disagrees with you.

I recall an incident in California many, many years ago where a case of road rage led to a dog being thrown into traffic and killed. Around that same time, a 9 year old girl disappeared. The reward for finding the man who killed the dog was considerably more than the reward for the little girl.