Report Shows Online Ties Linking HuffPost, the Guardian, and SPLC to Antifa

when one is an idiot and cant follow the money and has no idea what it means to follow that trail of " donnation" or charity you will never know how dumb you are until you realize how one hand feeds the other.

You can't tell how dumb you are when you aren't even able to comprehend how 6 corporations feed each other via stocks bonds corporate pay offs gawd the american public really are the dumbest mother fkrs on the planet. honest to gawd.

BIGGEST LIBRARY IN THE WORLD YET WE HAVE THE DUMBEST MOTHER FKRS OF THE CENTURY!!

The 6 Companies That Own (almost) All Media [Infographic] | WebFX
www.webfx.com
Anonymous View
This infographic shows you how six companies control (almost) all media options ... Whether they own a company entirely, possess majority shares, or even own ...
Bernie Sanders: How Corporate Media Threatens Our Democracy
inthesetimes.com
Anonymous View
Jan 26, 2017 ... For the corporate media, the real issues facing the American people— .... six corporations control 90 percent of what we see, hear, and read.
6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America - Morris ...
www.morriscreative.com
Anonymous View
Jun 15, 2012 ... 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America ... In an environment like this, a company needs to have a clear marketing strategy if it ...
Who Owns the Media? - PBS
www.pbs.org
Anonymous View
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled most of the American media, including ... of free thinkers, embraced as a liberating force from corporate owned media.
Chart: These 6 Companies Control Much of U.S. Media | Fortune
fortune.com
Anonymous View
Jul 24, 2018 ... Can they retain control of the medium and the message? Welcome to Hollywood, . The company that most people associate with mobile ...
Media Reform Information Center - Corporate Accountability Project
www.corporations.org
Anonymous View
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book ...
Government and corporations hinder journalists with 'media capture ...
www.cjr.org
Anonymous View
Aug 29, 2017 ... Government and corporate control of the press is certainly not new but has gone in a new direction, exacerbated not just by the rise of right ...
Media Control | Free Press
www.freepress.net
Anonymous View
Powerful corporations want to decide what you're able to watch, listen to, read and share. And runaway media consolidation among news organizations has ...


IS IT REALLY THAT HARD TO COMPREHEND

upload_2019-7-5_8-13-36.png


Chart: These 6 Companies Control Much of U.S. Media
 
HuffPost is beyond anti-white-cop
their readers are crazy with TDS
 
PUNCHING BACK TWICE AS HARD: Fake News NY Times Slapped With $5M Lawsuit For Citing Racist SPLC, Branding Immigration Hawk a ‘White Nationalist.’

On Thursday Peter Brimelow filed a $5 million defamation lawsuit against The Fake News New York Times, after the Fake News newspaper maliciously attacked his character by branding him a "white nationalist" and citing the disreputable far-left Racist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to bolster the charge.

On January 15, 2019, the Fake News Times branded Brimelow an "open white nationalist" in an article published online and in print. In opposition to its stated journalistic standards, the paper did not reach out to him for comment first. When his lawyer sent a letter demanding it retract the claim, the Fake News Times made a "stealth edit," removing the word "open" from the online article and — again in violation of its own stated journalistic standards — not appending a correction to the article.

The online version of the words "white nationalist" link to an SPLC article accusing Brimelow of "hate" and "extremism."

According to the lawsuit, Brimelow's legal team reached out to the Fake News Times on February 15, 2019, September 27, 2019, and October 16, 2019, claiming that the "stealth edit" did not reverse the defamatory act. Brimelow also sent the Fake News Times multiple "letters to the editor" rebutting the "white nationalist" accusation. The paper did not respond to these messages.

"The Defendant imputed to the Plaintiff race hatred and traits inconsistent with his profession," the lawsuit charges. "Plaintiff has been injured in his good name, fame, credit, profession, and reputation as a man, and in his various public and private positions, callings, and lines of endeavor, and has been held up to public ridicule before his acquaintances and the public, and to suffer the loss of prestige and standing in his community and elsewhere."​

Brimelow estimated the defamation cost him $700,000, and demanded the court order the Fake News paper to fork over "an amount no less than Five Million Dollars, together with punitive damages, and the costs and disbursements of this action."

Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines "white nationalist" as "one of a group of militant whites who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation." Brimelow may have repugnant views about race and intelligence and he may advocate for a kind of white identity politics, but according to Merriam-Webster, that does not make him a white nationalist.

The Racist SPLC branded Brimelow a "white nationalist" in an attempt to stifle debate on immigration and because it wished to vilify his views that race may be biologically connected to intelligence. Yet The Fake News New York Times has itself "bravely pushed the boundaries of the taboos on race," the lawsuit states, citing articles published between July 2001 and March 2003 which covered scientific developments supposedly linking race to genetics.

Nicholas Wade wrote those articles, and the lawsuit recounts that the Racist SPLC attacked him "for writing about the science of race differences" in May 2014.

"Nevertheless, Defendant knows that it itself is not a purveyor of hate or white nationalism because it has published articles on the science of racial differences," Brimelow argues.​

The lawsuit quoted a letter the VDARE editor sent to the paper two day after it published the article attacking him.

"Mr. Brimelow is not a ‘white nationalist’ and, specifically, does not refer to himself as such," the letter stated. "To the contrary, he has repeatedly said that he is a ‘civic nationalist.’ For example, in a February 23, 2018 interview with Slate’s Osita Nwanevu, Mr. Brimelow stated as follows: ‘Personally, I would regard myself as a civic nationalist.’"​

“The fact that VDARE has published some critiques of America’s immigration policies from those who aim to defend the interests of whites does not mean that Mr. Brimelow is an ‘open white nationalist,’ any more than the New York Times’s decision to publish op-eds by avowed socialists makes it ‘openly socialist,'" his lawyer argued.​
 
Corrupt institutions like the New York Times and the Southern Poverty Law Center need to be attacked whenever possible, and popular support needs to be mobilized behind the idea that newspapers and partisan organizations should not be given carte blanche to lie with impunity about their political opponents.
 

Forum List

Back
Top