Repeal of the 2nd Amendment would not abolish any rights.

You sure try hard to earn that *LEFT WING OPERATIVE PAY* don't ya... spamming the board with all your leftist garbage.

#1 Only total nitwit teabaggers use the term 'leftist'


#2

dawson-crying.jpg
 
I was watching CNN just a while ago.. here are the stats I heard. Chicago is a gun free zone. TOTAL gun ban in CHICAGO.. KNow how many people died from GSW in this TOTALLY gun free zone? IN one year, this year, the year 2012 500 peoplewere shot to death. aka MURDERED with GUNS.

Maybe we can get one of these gun control zealots to explain how that can POSSIBLY happen when ALL THE GUNS ARE GONE... hey hazelbut... tell us why... :eusa_eh:

Um.... Nitwit.

The gun ban was overturned.

Idiot.

Fail.

Inbred.

Joke.

All terms to describe you.
 
I was watching CNN just a while ago.. here are the stats I heard. Chicago is a gun free zone. TOTAL gun ban in CHICAGO.. KNow how many people died from GSW in this TOTALLY gun free zone? IN one year, this year, the year 2012 500 peoplewere shot to death. aka MURDERED with GUNS.

Maybe we can get one of these gun control zealots to explain how that can POSSIBLY happen when ALL THE GUNS ARE GONE... hey hazelbut... tell us why... :eusa_eh:

Um.... Nitwit.

The gun ban was overturned.

Idiot.

Fail.

Inbred.

Joke.

All terms to describe you.

What are liberals doing to stop all of those blacks in Chicago from murdering people?
 
The 2nd amendment cannot be repealed.

But, the military assault rifle will now always in this country be associated with the most heartwrenching massacre in modern history. The commercialized glorification of such weapons will at least be more difficult.


And what brought these weapons to the forefront?

The Clinton Assault Weapons Ban.

Before that 9mm's were king and AR15's were a niche weapon only owned by a small group mostly made up of military veterans like myself.

The law of of unintended consequences at work.

Everyone wants what they can't have...it's human nature.

Want to blame someone for the popularity of the AR15, you can start with the gun grabbers.
 
Then why can't we have automatic weapons, with the same ease of acquisition and possession as a semi-automatic weapon?

Because most gun owners are not the unreasonable "I WANT A HOWITZER GWARRR!" morons that the gun control people make them out to be. Most can see the need for restrictions on full autos, as well as felons not having weapons, and permits for concealed carry of handguns in public areas.

Semi autos, however, meet the intent of the 2nd amendment from both a personal protection standpoint, and a preservation of liberties standpoint.

So the second amendment doesn't protect the right to own automatic weapons? How do you know it protects the right to own semi-automatic weapons?

The automatic rifle is the standard issue personal weapon of the military. If defending yourself against 'tyranny' of the government is a legitimate purpose of the 2nd amendment,

then why wouldn't it protect your right to arm yourself in a manner comparable to the army of the tyrant?

Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.
 
I was watching CNN just a while ago.. here are the stats I heard. Chicago is a gun free zone. TOTAL gun ban in CHICAGO.. KNow how many people died from GSW in this TOTALLY gun free zone? IN one year, this year, the year 2012 500 peoplewere shot to death. aka MURDERED with GUNS.

Maybe we can get one of these gun control zealots to explain how that can POSSIBLY happen when ALL THE GUNS ARE GONE... hey hazelbut... tell us why... :eusa_eh:

So if guns were easier to get in Chicago, that would solve the problem?

non-answer noted
 
Because most gun owners are not the unreasonable "I WANT A HOWITZER GWARRR!" morons that the gun control people make them out to be. Most can see the need for restrictions on full autos, as well as felons not having weapons, and permits for concealed carry of handguns in public areas.

Semi autos, however, meet the intent of the 2nd amendment from both a personal protection standpoint, and a preservation of liberties standpoint.

So the second amendment doesn't protect the right to own automatic weapons? How do you know it protects the right to own semi-automatic weapons?

The automatic rifle is the standard issue personal weapon of the military. If defending yourself against 'tyranny' of the government is a legitimate purpose of the 2nd amendment,

then why wouldn't it protect your right to arm yourself in a manner comparable to the army of the tyrant?

Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.

The gun murder problem in America is predominantly a matter of black and hispanic men - a tiny percentage of who even can spell NRA.

These are your own. What are you Liberals going to do about it?
 
So the second amendment doesn't protect the right to own automatic weapons? How do you know it protects the right to own semi-automatic weapons?

The automatic rifle is the standard issue personal weapon of the military. If defending yourself against 'tyranny' of the government is a legitimate purpose of the 2nd amendment,

then why wouldn't it protect your right to arm yourself in a manner comparable to the army of the tyrant?

Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.

The gun murder problem in America is predominantly a matter of black and hispanic men - a tiny percentage of who even can spell NRA.

These are your own. What are you Liberals going to do about it?

More racist rants.

Go on....
 
I was watching CNN just a while ago.. here are the stats I heard. Chicago is a gun free zone. TOTAL gun ban in CHICAGO.. KNow how many people died from GSW in this TOTALLY gun free zone? IN one year, this year, the year 2012 500 peoplewere shot to death. aka MURDERED with GUNS.
Someone started a thread on that here this morning, too.
 
I was watching CNN just a while ago.. here are the stats I heard. Chicago is a gun free zone. TOTAL gun ban in CHICAGO.. KNow how many people died from GSW in this TOTALLY gun free zone? IN one year, this year, the year 2012 500 peoplewere shot to death. aka MURDERED with GUNS.
Someone started a thread on that here this morning, too. For 2,700,000 people that's heinous.
 
Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.

The gun murder problem in America is predominantly a matter of black and hispanic men - a tiny percentage of who even can spell NRA.

These are your own. What are you Liberals going to do about it?

More racist rants.

Go on....


What are you liberals going to do about the fact that the vast majority of gun murder is committed by blacks and hispanics with small firearms well within any definition of our right to bear arms?

I'll keep asking on every thread you start on this topic until you provide satisfactory answer.


LOL
 
Because most gun owners are not the unreasonable "I WANT A HOWITZER GWARRR!" morons that the gun control people make them out to be. Most can see the need for restrictions on full autos, as well as felons not having weapons, and permits for concealed carry of handguns in public areas.

Semi autos, however, meet the intent of the 2nd amendment from both a personal protection standpoint, and a preservation of liberties standpoint.

So the second amendment doesn't protect the right to own automatic weapons? How do you know it protects the right to own semi-automatic weapons?

The automatic rifle is the standard issue personal weapon of the military. If defending yourself against 'tyranny' of the government is a legitimate purpose of the 2nd amendment,

then why wouldn't it protect your right to arm yourself in a manner comparable to the army of the tyrant?

Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.


Patently false.

The Second Amendment is simply another check and balance built into the Constitution.

Arms are arms...not canons, not howitzers, not F-18's...arms.

This "Thermonuclear bomb" hyperbole is foolishness.
 
So the second amendment doesn't protect the right to own automatic weapons? How do you know it protects the right to own semi-automatic weapons?

The automatic rifle is the standard issue personal weapon of the military. If defending yourself against 'tyranny' of the government is a legitimate purpose of the 2nd amendment,

then why wouldn't it protect your right to arm yourself in a manner comparable to the army of the tyrant?

Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.

The gun murder problem in America is predominantly a matter of black and hispanic men - a tiny percentage of who even can spell NRA.

These are your own. What are you Liberals going to do about it?

No it's not.

We have no fucking idea what the real numbers are..

The NRA and Republicans blocked the government from releasing the true numbers.
 
Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.

The gun murder problem in America is predominantly a matter of black and hispanic men - a tiny percentage of who even can spell NRA.

These are your own. What are you Liberals going to do about it?

More racist rants.

Go on....

Pay careful attention to this, the truth is now a "racist rant"...

:clap2: :clap2: :clap2:

Your so special...
 
So the second amendment doesn't protect the right to own automatic weapons? How do you know it protects the right to own semi-automatic weapons?

The automatic rifle is the standard issue personal weapon of the military. If defending yourself against 'tyranny' of the government is a legitimate purpose of the 2nd amendment,

then why wouldn't it protect your right to arm yourself in a manner comparable to the army of the tyrant?

Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.


Patently false.

The Second Amendment is simply another check and balance built into the Constitution.

Arms are arms...not canons, not howitzers, not F-18's...arms.

This "Thermonuclear bomb" hyperbole is foolishness.

It absolutely is not a check..at least not the way you folks think it is.

There is no clause, word, letter in the constitution that fosters the notion you can take up arms against the federal government, none. In fact..it is the EXACT opposite. There are several reasons in the Constitution the federal government can lawfully declare war. Of those are included invasion and insurrection.

The "check" was a guard against a standing professional army under federal control. What the constitution prescribed were regional militias made up of citizens that would fill into an army as needed.

That' "check" has been completely obliterated.
 
Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.

The gun murder problem in America is predominantly a matter of black and hispanic men - a tiny percentage of who even can spell NRA.

These are your own. What are you Liberals going to do about it?

No it's not.

We have no fucking idea what the real numbers are..

The NRA and Republicans blocked the government from releasing the true numbers.

I am calling you out.

Black men, alone, just 6% of the population account for over HALF of gun murders all by themselves. And of course, as you like to remind us black men are almost exclusively Democrats.

What are Liberals going to do about YOUR gun murder problem?
 
I was watching CNN just a while ago.. here are the stats I heard. Chicago is a gun free zone. TOTAL gun ban in CHICAGO.. KNow how many people died from GSW in this TOTALLY gun free zone? IN one year, this year, the year 2012 500 peoplewere shot to death. aka MURDERED with GUNS.

Maybe we can get one of these gun control zealots to explain how that can POSSIBLY happen when ALL THE GUNS ARE GONE... hey hazelbut... tell us why... :eusa_eh:

Um.... Nitwit.


Idiot.

Fail.

Inbred.

Joke.



All terms to describe you.
\


what about previous years and all the other cities that had gun bans only to have high rates of gun violence? I would ask if you are really that myopic, but you really do answer that question with every one of your posts.

Um.... Nitwit.



Idiot.

Fail.

Inbred.

Joke.

racist.

hypocrite.

sarcastic punk.

All terms to describe you
 
Using the construct of the gun lobby..the second amendment protects an indivduals right to own a thermal nuclear weapon.

And by their own construct..it would be a necessary thing to own..since in that construct citizens have the "right" to attack governments they don't like.

The NRA's construct of the second amendment and US case law has impacted our society in a terrible and horrific fashion.

The bloodbath will continue unabated until these people's construct is seen to be what it really is..bullshit.


Patently false.

The Second Amendment is simply another check and balance built into the Constitution.

Arms are arms...not canons, not howitzers, not F-18's...arms.

This "Thermonuclear bomb" hyperbole is foolishness.

It absolutely is not a check..at least not the way you folks think it is.

There is no clause, word, letter in the constitution that fosters the notion you can take up arms against the federal government, none. In fact..it is the EXACT opposite. There are several reasons in the Constitution the federal government can lawfully declare war. Of those are included invasion and insurrection.

The "check" was a guard against a standing professional army under federal control. What the constitution prescribed were regional militias made up of citizens that would fill into an army as needed.

That' "check" has been completely obliterated.



local militias were to protect from Injuns as well

militia men were to supply their own

firelock
ammo
bayonet or other edged weapon
 

Forum List

Back
Top