Rep Steve King: Same-Sex Marriage Is ‘A Purely Socialist Concept’

[Modbert]

So this is what has come to? McCarthyism at it's finest? Point one's fingers and cry saying it's socialist automatically makes it evil?

Think Progress » King: Same-Sex Marriage Is ‘A Purely Socialist Concept’

It also found that “the overwhelming majority of Iowans – 92 percent – say gay marriage has brought no real change to their lives.” Asked about the poll, King complained that many Iowans do not have “a very good understanding of what same-sex marriage does to the overall institution of marriage.” After claiming that “Rick Santorum was right” when he said that expanding gay rights would lead to a “right to incest,” King asserted that same-sex marriage is “a purely socialist concept”:

So lets recap:

1.) The Majority of Iowans have stated that Gay Marriage does not affect them.

2.) King goes ahead and insults his own state by saying "they don't have a good understanding."

3.) He says expanding gay rights would lead to incest.

4.) Gay Marriage is a purely socialist concept.

So which of you on this board want to agree with this scumbag? Any takers?

 

[jillian]

Is he retarded?

 

[Modbert]

Is he retarded?

Nope, Republican.



Seriously though, this guy is a fool and has proven himself to be one in the past as well. Why the hell the people of Iowa vote for him I have no idea.

 

[blu]

yea because a contract between two consenting adults always leads to incest. he reminds me of these idiots:

 

[Lost Soul]

Boy sounds just like Obamacare.

Majority of Americans do NOT want it.

Congress says they will ram it down our throats.

Obama claims the system is broken must be fixed.

American protest by the millions against it.

Democrats move forward anyways.

Retarded isnt it.

 

[Lost Soul]

yea because a contract between two consenting adults always leads to incest. he reminds me of these idiots:

If you really want the truth, they were democrats standing on the capital protesting civil rights not republicans.

 

[Shogun]

yea because a contract between two consenting adults always leads to incest. he reminds me of these idiots:

If you really want the truth, they were democrats standing on the capital protesting civil rights not republicans.

yea... BEFORE the southern strategy.

 

[Lost Soul]

yea because a contract between two consenting adults always leads to incest. he reminds me of these idiots:

If you really want the truth, they were democrats standing on the capital protesting civil rights not republicans.

yea... BEFORE the southern strategy.

You realize that southern states like GA didnt have their first republican majority until 2000 for the first time in 147 years?

And out of the last 5 last presidents, two were democrats from southern states.

So you BS excuse that democrats are not southern racist is just that, a big pile of BULLSHIT!

 

[Article 15]

Then they all became rank and file republicans.

 

[Article 15]

Votes by region for the Civil Rights Act of 1964

From Wiki:

The original House version:

* Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
* Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)

* Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
* Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)

The Senate version:

* Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
* Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
* Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
* Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%) (Senators Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Shogun]

If you really want the truth, they were democrats standing on the capital protesting civil rights not republicans.

yea... BEFORE the southern strategy.

You realize that southern states like GA didnt have their first republican majority until 2000 for the first time in 147 years?

And out of the last 5 last presidents, two were democrats from southern states.

So you BS excuse that democrats are not southern racist is just that, a big pile of BULLSHIT!

yea, clinton and carter sure were giant klansmen!

:rofL:




Sorry, nutter. No one is ignorant enough to miss which party sopped up the former racist dems like gravy to a biscuit ON PURPOSE. Shall I start quoting Nixon strategists?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

If you really want the truth, they were democrats standing on the capital protesting civil rights not republicans.

yea... BEFORE the southern strategy.

You realize that southern states like GA didnt have their first republican majority until 2000 for the first time in 147 years?

And out of the last 5 last presidents, two were democrats from southern states.

So you BS excuse that democrats are not southern racist is just that, a big pile of BULLSHIT!

I've been trying to tell these idiots that about the democratic party for a while now. You'll find that facts are something the liberals here simply ignore.

 

[Modbert]

I've been trying to tell these idiots that about the democratic party for a while now. You'll find that facts are something the liberals here simply ignore.

So tell me, how blissful is it being ignorant?

 

[Lost Soul]

Then they all became rank and file republicans.

Then if they BECAME republicans, this picture where I call it a bunch of democrats would be true then.

You think there are no democrats from southern states? Funny the party that allows a once grand wizard to be a member of that still uses the n word would now claim they are no longer the party of racists.

Yet Wright, Jones, Jackson, Farrakhan, Sharpton, McKinney are all raicsts and democrats.

 

[Shogun]

yea... BEFORE the southern strategy.

You realize that southern states like GA didnt have their first republican majority until 2000 for the first time in 147 years?

And out of the last 5 last presidents, two were democrats from southern states.

So you BS excuse that democrats are not southern racist is just that, a big pile of BULLSHIT!

I've been trying to tell these idiots that about the democratic party for a while now. You'll find that facts are something the liberals here simply ignore.

RNC Chief to Say It Was 'Wrong' to Exploit Racial Conflict for Votes

It was called "the southern strategy," started under Richard M. Nixon in 1968, and described Republican efforts to use race as a wedge issue -- on matters such as desegregation and busing -- to appeal to white southern voters.

Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman, this morning will tell the NAACP national convention in Milwaukee that it was "wrong."

"By the '70s and into the '80s and '90s, the Democratic Party solidified its gains in the African American community, and we Republicans did not effectively reach out," Mehlman says in his prepared text. "Some Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong."

RNC Chief to Say It Was 'Wrong' to Exploit Racial Conflict for Votes - washingtonpost.com

 

[xsited1]

So this is what has come to? McCarthyism at it's finest? Point one's fingers and cry saying it's socialist automatically makes it evil?

Think Progress » King: Same-Sex Marriage Is ‘A Purely Socialist Concept’

...

I don't know if it's a socialist concept or not, but the voters should have been allowed to decide on this issue rather than the Iowa Supreme Court.

Forty-one percent say they would vote for a ban, and 40 percent say they would vote to continue gay marriage. The rest either would not vote or say they are not sure.

Iowa Poll: Iowans evenly divided on gay marriage ban | DesMoinesRegister.com | The Des Moines Register

 

[Article 15]

Tyranny of the majority.

 

[Shogun]

indeed. We should probably go ahead and let Georgia vote to put ******* back in the fields too.


after all... Reagan ran his first campaign on STATES RIGHTS...

 

[xsited1]

Tyranny of the majority.

That's difficult to avoid at the State level.

 

[Modbert]

indeed. We should probably go ahead and let Georgia vote to put ******* back in the fields too.


after all... Reagan ran his first campaign on STATES RIGHTS...

And after that, states can vote on the right to kill "Socialists."