Rep. Paul Broun asked: 'Who Is Going To Shoot Obama?' Broun doesn't disagree

Now I understand why Georgia Rep. Paul Braun didn't answer the question:

“It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he’s the one who proposed this national security force. I’m just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may — may not, I hope not — but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism.

“That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did,” Broun said. “When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist.”

“We can’t be lulled into complacency,” Broun said. “You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I’m not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I’m saying is there is the potential.”
Sound crazy? Read your history books. Not the new ones they give the kids in school now. The real ones. And look at Europe right now, with it’s disarmed citizenry and Islamic Shari’a law courts.

U.S. Congressman Warns Of Obama Dictatorship | Right Soup

You see? Obama is EXACTLY like Hitler!
 
He chose not to dignify the remark with a response and issued a condemnation of such sentiments as soon as the meeting was over. What more do you want from him? Does he have to kill the guy with his bare hands to make you people happy?
 
Thanks to Soros's ever vigilant leftie sites like MM republicans are damned if they do and damed if they don't. Maybe he didn't hear the question. Maybe it was a setup by some trickster. Maybe he thought it was best to ignore a foolish question rather than get into a pissing contest in public. What about that radical leftie democrat who said the union members should "get bloody"?
 
Someone asked the question 'who is going to shoot Obama?'. Please provide the quote that backs up your claim that anyone said 'Obama should be shot'.

The two are not the same. One is a question. The other a statement. I can see where the question was asked. I cannot find the statement that suggests Obama should be shot.

Rep. Paul Broun Asked At Town Hall: 'Who Is Going To Shoot Obama?'

Sweetheart, don't use your rep power as "political capital" to ignore the elephant in the room.

You don't need an grammar lesson to understand what that nut meant to say.

Comedian Chris Rock made a living joking about the "assassination of a black president". So are you really surprised that an angry white man had brought that possibility up, in a town hall meeting?

....Really???
... Really??
.. Really?
 
Another professor weighs in. This isn't an English class. I may not be the best writer, but you know damn well what I meant. Is this really all you have? You can't condemn the question or Braun, but you can criticize the wording of my post. How do you people sleep at night?

Which bit of calling it a 'stupid question' is too complicated for you to understand? No one is supporting anyone asking such a ridiculous question. We are saying that Braun handled it appropriately. He ignored it and make his point. Which happens to be against ObamaCare. Works for me.

Bearing in mind, he was not expecting the question... and bearing in mind that politicians are trained to 'handle' that type of question by ignoring it and sticking to their point, I think he handled it appropriately.

What should he have done? Given it credence by saying.... what exactly? 'No one is gonna shoot Obama'? 'I don't know who is going to shoot Obama'? Any answer he gave would have been stupid. He acted appropriately.

What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"



But he might lose some votes if he were to say that.
 
Someone asked the question 'who is going to shoot Obama?'. Please provide the quote that backs up your claim that anyone said 'Obama should be shot'.

The two are not the same. One is a question. The other a statement. I can see where the question was asked. I cannot find the statement that suggests Obama should be shot.

Really? That all you have? The semantics of my post? Sorry, professor, this isn't an English class. The question was asked. Do you agree with it? How do you feel about Braun's lack of condemnation?

are you this stupid in real life?

tant pis
 
Which bit of calling it a 'stupid question' is too complicated for you to understand? No one is supporting anyone asking such a ridiculous question. We are saying that Braun handled it appropriately. He ignored it and make his point. Which happens to be against ObamaCare. Works for me.

Bearing in mind, he was not expecting the question... and bearing in mind that politicians are trained to 'handle' that type of question by ignoring it and sticking to their point, I think he handled it appropriately.

What should he have done? Given it credence by saying.... what exactly? 'No one is gonna shoot Obama'? 'I don't know who is going to shoot Obama'? Any answer he gave would have been stupid. He acted appropriately.

What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"



But he might lose some votes if he were to say that.

Doesn't really have anything to do with 'votes', it has to do with there being no actual answer to the question 'who is going to shoot Obama'.

He did the right thing, he ignored it. Only fucking morons make an issue out of not responding to a fucking stupid question.
 
Which bit of calling it a 'stupid question' is too complicated for you to understand? No one is supporting anyone asking such a ridiculous question. We are saying that Braun handled it appropriately. He ignored it and make his point. Which happens to be against ObamaCare. Works for me.

Bearing in mind, he was not expecting the question... and bearing in mind that politicians are trained to 'handle' that type of question by ignoring it and sticking to their point, I think he handled it appropriately.

What should he have done? Given it credence by saying.... what exactly? 'No one is gonna shoot Obama'? 'I don't know who is going to shoot Obama'? Any answer he gave would have been stupid. He acted appropriately.

What answer could he have given? Really? Oh, I don't know. How about, "That's a really inappropriate question", "He is the POTUS. I'm disgusted that anybody would suggestion that he be shot", "This is the USA. If you're unhappy with the POTUS, vote against him, don't suggest that he be shot"



But he might lose some votes if he were to say that.

Ding ding ding.
 
Someone asked the question 'who is going to shoot Obama?'. Please provide the quote that backs up your claim that anyone said 'Obama should be shot'.

The two are not the same. One is a question. The other a statement. I can see where the question was asked. I cannot find the statement that suggests Obama should be shot.

Rep. Paul Broun Asked At Town Hall: 'Who Is Going To Shoot Obama?'

Sweetheart, don't use your rep power as "political capital" to ignore the elephant in the room.

You don't need an grammar lesson to understand what that nut meant to say.

Comedian Chris Rock made a living joking about the "assassination of a black president". So are you really surprised that an angry white man had brought that possibility up, in a town hall meeting?

....Really???
... Really??
.. Really?

I can use my rep power any way I want to. And those who tell me not to, get negged. Mmmk? I also neg people for calling me 'sweetheart', you misogynist asshole.

I don't care what some comedian said, nor do I care what some idiot white guy said. It was a stupid question and deserved to be ignored. However, I am not at all surprised that some really stupid people wanna make a big fucking deal about it.
 
It's not semantics. It's fact. There is no quote that says 'Obama should be shot'. Someone asked a question. A stupid question. And Braun ignored it. So? Responding to it would have given it credence, he chose not to give it credence. I have no problem with that.

It was a rhetorical question.

I doubt it. Few, if any, right winger leaders speak up when all the other bizarre Obama accusations are made.

I meant that it was a rhetorical question in the sense that it was a question making a statement, expressing an opinion.
 
Someone asked the question 'who is going to shoot Obama?'. Please provide the quote that backs up your claim that anyone said 'Obama should be shot'.

The two are not the same. One is a question. The other a statement. I can see where the question was asked. I cannot find the statement that suggests Obama should be shot.

Really? That all you have? The semantics of my post? Sorry, professor, this isn't an English class. The question was asked. Do you agree with it? How do you feel about Braun's lack of condemnation?

are you this stupid in real life?

tant pis

Hey, mouth-breather, close your gape. I can smell the ball-cheese and curdled cum through my computer screen.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top