Dragon
Senior Member
- Sep 16, 2011
- 5,481
- 588
- 48
Did it fool you?
No, it didn't. But it might have fooled a few people for a while.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did it fool you?
Face it. Everything Obama says fools you.Did it fool you?
No, it didn't. But it might have fooled a few people for a while.
Face it. Everything Obama says fools you.
Wow, we have people pushing for socialism, and some communism
Who in the Obama administration is pushing for either of those? And: please define your terms.
population control
In what sense? What specific measures to control population growth are being advocated?
"From the bench" implies action by the Judicial branch, not the Executive. What are you talking about?
Please define what you mean by this, and in what ways the Obama administration wants it or is acting to bring it about.
What radical agenda? What exactly do you think Obama is trying to push? Why do you consider it "radical"? What evidence do you have for this?
Naturally Obama's cabinet and other appointees are there to push his agenda (whether or not it is "radical"). There's nothing unusual in that.
In what way?
There is nothing radical about most tea party members, who simply want our constitution adhered to and our free market capitalism protected.
Almost everyone wants "our constitution protected." What's radical about the Tea Party, or some of its members anyway, is the highly unusual interpretation they give to the Constitution, and the things they think are unconstitutional that aren't.
"Free market capitalism" is at this point in history itself radical; we abandoned it as of the 1930s, which makes it just slightly less radical than slavery.
It's not the job of government to change this country, but rather to keep it on track.
This is itself an example of a radical idea. (Radical reactionary, but that counts.) The government's job is to implement the will of the people (consistent with constitutional protections of individual rights). If the will of the people is for change, then it is the government's job to change this country, and that has happened quite often in our history.
The remainder of your post clearly shows what is messed up and irrational about your mindset; you consistently confuse the concepts of "what I like" with "what should be" and even "what's in the Constitution." They are not the same.