Remember the CEO who raised salaries to $70k?

The Rabbi

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2009
67,733
7,923
1,840
Nashville
Yeah well that didnt work out quite like he wanted. Turns out you can't pay everyone the same because not everyone performs the same. Oops. Not like we didnt tell you. Now he has to rent out his house to make ends meet. Socialism fails 100% of the time. more at the source.
Remember the Seattle CEO Who Raised All Salaries to 70K Here s What Happened Next...


When Dan Price, founder and CEO of the Seattle-based credit-card-payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company’s minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.

“Everyone start[ed] screaming and cheering and just going crazy,” Price told Business Insider shortly after he broke the news in April.

But in the weeks since then, it’s become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price’s own employees.

Maisey McMaster — once a big supporter of the plan — is one of the employees that quit. McMaster, 26, joined the company five years ago, eventually working her way up to financial manager. She put in long hours that “left little time for her husband and extended family,” The Times says, but she loved the “special culture” of the place.

But while she was initially on board, helping to calculate whether the company could afford to raise salaries so drastically (the plan is a minimum of $70,000 over the course of three years), McMaster later began to have doubts.

“He gave raises to people who have the least skills and are the least equipped to do the job, and the ones who were taking on the most didn’t get much of a bump,” she told The Times. A fairer plan, she told the paper, would give newer employees smaller increases, along with the chance to earn a more substantial raise with more experience.
 
Fools
hysterical-laughter-o.gif
 
Idiots. Most employees aren't worth minimum wage. To pay some dumb shit (who is just looking to collect a paycheck and work as little as possible) the same amount you pay your best employees is just plain stupid. The guy deserves to go under.
 
Clearly the man wasn't thinking wisely, so now he's paying the financial consequences. Is there any word on if he's going to continue using that failed system?

We already have an active thread about this. Your side lost.

Right.

Because it's just a game to you.

Oh? What is "it" to you in the politics section....where this clearly doesn't belong.

You seem to think politics is just a game where one side wins and one side loses. Reading through the OP, it just struck me how childish that is.
 
Calling what happens on USMB "politics" is like saying that Kool-Aid is fruit juice.
 
Calling what happens on USMB "politics" is like saying that Kool-Aid is fruit juice.
I see I am in your sig line. That means I own you. Sucker.
I do agree with this statement.
For the rest: when he announced this all the leftards were cheering what a great guy he was and how anyone who didnt do that was stingy. Now we see why CEOs dont routinely do this: Everyone in the company suffers.
Looks like socialism has continued its 100% fail rate.
 
You seem to think politics is just a game where one side wins and one side loses. Reading through the OP, it just struck me how childish that is.
No, that's it entirely. Leftists dont give a shit about ethics, principles or fair play or anything else. It's "My team is great, the other team sucks." So when people post items about Dem lawmakers being stupid the answer always is not "no he was smart" but "well he's still better than your guys."
 
Clearly the man wasn't thinking wisely, so now he's paying the financial consequences. Is there any word on if he's going to continue using that failed system?

We already have an active thread about this. Your side lost.

Right.

Because it's just a game to you.

Oh? What is "it" to you in the politics section....where this clearly doesn't belong.

You seem to think politics is just a game where one side wins and one side loses. Reading through the OP, it just struck me how childish that is.

Well, liberals almost always win on social issuesso it isn't much in the way of competition. As soon as you folks on the right get serious about the contest and start treating the subjects and the competition with sober respect, I will be happy to engage. I fear those days of learned adversaries on USMB are over.

Case in point, HRC has experience in the Senate, as FLOTUS, and as SoS. These are facts. I would imagine that in the next 2 days, one of you blowhards will be reciting the "she's not qualified" billabong while insisting others with fewer credentials are.

Again, I hope for a serious back and fourth. But the heavyweights on the conservative side are either gone or hiding in their create-a-forum where you can't question one another.
 
Clearly the man wasn't thinking wisely, so now he's paying the financial consequences. Is there any word on if he's going to continue using that failed system?

We already have an active thread about this. Your side lost.

Right.

Because it's just a game to you.

Oh? What is "it" to you in the politics section....where this clearly doesn't belong.

You seem to think politics is just a game where one side wins and one side loses. Reading through the OP, it just struck me how childish that is.

Well, liberals almost always win on social issuesso it isn't much in the way of competition. As soon as you folks on the right get serious about the contest and start treating the subjects and the competition with sober respect, I will be happy to engage. I fear those days of learned adversaries on USMB are over.

Case in point, HRC has experience in the Senate, as FLOTUS, and as SoS. These are facts. I would imagine that in the next 2 days, one of you blowhards will be reciting the "she's not qualified" billabong while insisting others with fewer credentials are.

Again, I hope for a serious back and fourth. But the heavyweights on the conservative side are either gone or hiding in their create-a-forum where you can't question one another.
You're not worried about her record of lying, dissembling, and taking bribes?
 
Clearly the man wasn't thinking wisely, so now he's paying the financial consequences. Is there any word on if he's going to continue using that failed system?

We already have an active thread about this. Your side lost.

Right.

Because it's just a game to you.

Oh? What is "it" to you in the politics section....where this clearly doesn't belong.

You seem to think politics is just a game where one side wins and one side loses. Reading through the OP, it just struck me how childish that is.

Well, liberals almost always win on social issuesso it isn't much in the way of competition. As soon as you folks on the right get serious about the contest and start treating the subjects and the competition with sober respect, I will be happy to engage. I fear those days of learned adversaries on USMB are over.

Case in point, HRC has experience in the Senate, as FLOTUS, and as SoS. These are facts. I would imagine that in the next 2 days, one of you blowhards will be reciting the "she's not qualified" billabong while insisting others with fewer credentials are.

Again, I hope for a serious back and fourth. But the heavyweights on the conservative side are either gone or hiding in their create-a-forum where you can't question one another.
You're not worried about her record of lying, dissembling, and taking bribes?

Not worried at all about the attack culture of the right wing hate groups. More worried about Hillary trying to be folksy.
 
Clearly the man wasn't thinking wisely, so now he's paying the financial consequences. Is there any word on if he's going to continue using that failed system?

Right.

Because it's just a game to you.

Oh? What is "it" to you in the politics section....where this clearly doesn't belong.

You seem to think politics is just a game where one side wins and one side loses. Reading through the OP, it just struck me how childish that is.

Well, liberals almost always win on social issuesso it isn't much in the way of competition. As soon as you folks on the right get serious about the contest and start treating the subjects and the competition with sober respect, I will be happy to engage. I fear those days of learned adversaries on USMB are over.

Case in point, HRC has experience in the Senate, as FLOTUS, and as SoS. These are facts. I would imagine that in the next 2 days, one of you blowhards will be reciting the "she's not qualified" billabong while insisting others with fewer credentials are.

Again, I hope for a serious back and fourth. But the heavyweights on the conservative side are either gone or hiding in their create-a-forum where you can't question one another.
You're not worried about her record of lying, dissembling, and taking bribes?

Not worried at all about the attack culture of the right wing hate groups. More worried about Hillary trying to be folksy.
Are you worried about the clear evidence that she broke rules, probably violated the laws, compromised national security, and likely took bribes?
 
This isn't socialism, LOL.

I think they're referring to Bernie Sanders... who, democratic socialist or no, seems to be growing in popularity at an astounding pace. In the past 30 hours, 8,000 people have signed up for his rally in Portland, Oregon, which is scheduled for next Saturday. At that rate, they'll have to move it to the bigger Rose Garden arena, because there will be enough RSVPs to fill the Veterans Memorial Coliseum by tomorrow night.

-- Paravani
 
Idiots. Most employees aren't worth minimum wage. To pay some dumb shit (who is just looking to collect a paycheck and work as little as possible) the same amount you pay your best employees is just plain stupid. The guy deserves to go under.

Most employees are not worth minimum wage. Okay, you're a moron. While I would never suggest a company pay all of their employees close to the same amount, saying that most people are not worth minimum wage and suggesting companies hire dumb shits to work for them is just insulting to hard working people. The maintenance guy for a company may work his ass off and do a great job, but his job does not demand $70,000 per year. That does not make him a dumb shit, lazy, or undeserving of a respectable wage for the job he holds. This is why you guys fail so often. You can't be reasonable about anything.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: PK1
I'm enjoying how this PP thing is ripping the GOP apart. It's such sweet irony, to see their bestest plan backfiring on them. Half of the Republicans are hysterically screaming to defund PP, and the other half is getting cursed at by the crazies for not being totally insane.

While the democrats rip apart the babies

20,000 children will die today around the world that YOU can save.

If you were pro-life you'd be devoting your entire life to saving THOSE babies, whom you CAN save right now.

You don't because you don't believe in the sanctity of life.

We have two adopted children, your argument is moot. Oh....and until you step up, shut up

Doesn't matter, you let that many children die every single day. You are a world class hypocrite. And the thing is, you know it.

Idiots. Most employees aren't worth minimum wage. To pay some dumb shit (who is just looking to collect a paycheck and work as little as possible) the same amount you pay your best employees is just plain stupid. The guy deserves to go under.

Most employees are not worth minimum wage. Okay, you're a moron. While I would never suggest a company pay all of their employees close to the same amount, saying that most people are not worth minimum wage and suggesting companies hire dumb shits to work for them is just insulting to hard working people. The maintenance guy for a company may work his ass off and do a great job, but his job does not demand $70,000 per year. That does not make him a dumb shit, lazy, or undeserving of a respectable wage for the job he holds. This is why you guys fail so often. You can't be reasonable about anything.
A maintenance guy is not worth 70 grand a year?????? That's what I am and I make more then that
 

Forum List

Back
Top