hortysir
In Memorial of 47
California, Massachusetts, Illinois, and D.C. have had their government funding pulled and have been forced to end services, simply because they continue to believe in placing children with a mom and a dad.
But we can provide federal funds to Planned Parenthood?
What is the gain for the children?
Fewer agencies means more cases per worker, which means longer waiting lists.
Is the argument as basic as 'no federal funding for anything faith-based' regardless of who it impacts?
Seems I constantly hear how republicans only care about children in the womb.
What do you call this? You can fund an abortion-providing organization but not adoption or foster care?
Google Search: Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2015
But we can provide federal funds to Planned Parenthood?
What is the gain for the children?
Fewer agencies means more cases per worker, which means longer waiting lists.
Is the argument as basic as 'no federal funding for anything faith-based' regardless of who it impacts?
Seems I constantly hear how republicans only care about children in the womb.
What do you call this? You can fund an abortion-providing organization but not adoption or foster care?
Google Search: Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2015
