Reintroducing female responsibility.

Men always have the option of just saying "no" and keeping their pants zipped. I've not heard of many cases of women raping men.

It's absolutely ridiculous to say that getting pregnant is 100% in women's control when it's not. There are a lot of accidental pregnancies, but this is a fact that goes unacknowledged because it doesn't fit in with the narrative of the crazy right-wingers who are obsessed with female sexuality.
Relax Ly, no one is going to actually make you responsible for your own body.
 
Feminist legislation has eliminated female responsibility and today the primary source of democrat voting demography is financially motivated unmarried pregnancy.Therefore my proposal for a legislative change is to allow child support only if the mother can show a marriage certificate with the father for the time of the birth of the child.Discuss.
`
No proof or evidence to support this claim as stated. Thread FAIL.
`
 
Men always have the option of just saying "no" and keeping their pants zipped. I've not heard of many cases of women raping men.

It's absolutely ridiculous to say that getting pregnant is 100% in women's control when it's not. There are a lot of accidental pregnancies, but this is a fact that goes unacknowledged because it doesn't fit in with the narrative of the crazy right-wingers who are obsessed with female sexuality.

So, are you saying that women don't have the option of saying no?

The thesis is that women have very strong financial incentive to not say no. Plus to fish for more suckers.
 
Last edited:
Feminist legislation has eliminated female responsibility and today the primary source of democrat voting demography is financially motivated unmarried pregnancy.Therefore my proposal for a legislative change is to allow child support only if the mother can show a marriage certificate with the father for the time of the birth of the child.Discuss.
`
No proof or evidence to support this claim as stated. Thread FAIL.
`

The claim is supported by decades of US statistics on child support and democrat voter demographics.
 
Feminist legislation has eliminated female responsibility and today the primary source of democrat voting demography is financially motivated unmarried pregnancy.

Therefore my proposal for a legislative change is to allow child support only if the mother can show a marriage certificate with the father for the time of the birth of the child.

Discuss.

So a guy can't get laid unless he gets married first? #cockblocker :lol:
Even better, a girl can't get pregnant unless she marries the father first. :).
sorry, that takes all responsibility of putting your cock where it shouldn't be.... off of you and that simply is the problem.... if you are not ready to have a baby and a child, keep your pants zipped and THAT would truly solve the problem of unwanted pregnancies... HOW ABOUT WE, FORCE YOU to marry the female you got pregnant? How would you like that....? :eek:

in the old days, when men did hold responsibility for knocking their girl up, they married her... in both white and black communities.
Sorry, that takes all responsibility of putting your cock where it shouldn't be.... off of you and that simply is the problem.... if you are not ready to have a baby and a child, keep your pants zipped and THAT would truly solve the problem of unwanted pregnancies...
Cock is for pussy...guys wouldn't be unzipping their pants
if girls weren't spreading their legs open, for the cock
 
Feminist legislation has eliminated female responsibility and today the primary source of democrat voting demography is financially motivated unmarried pregnancy.

Therefore my proposal for a legislative change is to allow child support only if the mother can show a marriage certificate with the father for the time of the birth of the child.

Discuss.

So a guy can't get laid unless he gets married first? #cockblocker :lol:
It's called "monogamy". It respects the fact that "getting laid" can create a new human being with a biologically unique identity among the entire human race and a gifted soul with an eternal potential and destiny. Thus BOTH MALE and FEMALE RESPONSIBILITY for that NEW PERSON is LEGALLY RECOGNIZED AS MORE PRECIOUS THAN AN ENDANGERED WILDLIFE CREATURE. Get it? ("Get God." (Darwin "didn't".))
 
Men always have the option of just saying "no" and keeping their pants zipped. I've not heard of many cases of women raping men.

It's absolutely ridiculous to say that getting pregnant is 100% in women's control when it's not. There are a lot of accidental pregnancies, but this is a fact that goes unacknowledged because it doesn't fit in with the narrative of the crazy right-wingers who are obsessed with female sexuality.

So, are you saying that women don't have the option of saying no?

The thesis is that women have very strong financial incentive to not say no. Plus to fish for more suckers.

Why are you ducking the idea that men somehow can't say no?

Moreover, just why are the right-wing nut jobs so against using available technology to avoid unintended pregnancies in the first place? Gee, we humans invent and use tools to solve problems. This bad habit has been around for a very, very long time. The Hoover dam. Vaccinations to prevent disease. Airplanes. If the Supreme Being had intended us to fly, we would have wings.

And just what is it with the right-wing thing that everybody is a hooker at closing time and sex is dirty? Humans have human emotions. They get into relationships due to mutual affection and attraction. They hug, kiss, mate, and marry. It's appalling that there are "adults" who do not understand the fundamental facts of human life. Human sexuality exists, and is one of the strongest drives in human existence. Human emotions exist. Get over it.
 
The claim is supported by decades of US statistics on child support and democrat voter demographics.
`
No proof or evidence to support this claim as stated. - No links. Sorry.

Crying for a link is so cheap, that you can't find your support for your counter-argument even in the dollar store. Really? I held you in higher esteem before.
 
Men always have the option of just saying "no" and keeping their pants zipped. I've not heard of many cases of women raping men.

It's absolutely ridiculous to say that getting pregnant is 100% in women's control when it's not. There are a lot of accidental pregnancies, but this is a fact that goes unacknowledged because it doesn't fit in with the narrative of the crazy right-wingers who are obsessed with female sexuality.

So, are you saying that women don't have the option of saying no?

The thesis is that women have very strong financial incentive to not say no. Plus to fish for more suckers.

Why are you ducking the idea that men somehow can't say no?

Moreover, just why are the right-wing nut jobs so against using available technology to avoid unintended pregnancies in the first place? Gee, we humans invent and use tools to solve problems. This bad habit has been around for a very, very long time. The Hoover dam. Vaccinations to prevent disease. Airplanes. If the Supreme Being had intended us to fly, we would have wings.

And just what is it with the right-wing thing that everybody is a hooker at closing time and sex is dirty? Humans have human emotions. They get into relationships due to mutual affection and attraction. They hug, kiss, mate, and marry. It's appalling that there are "adults" who do not understand the fundamental facts of human life. Human sexuality exists, and is one of the strongest drives in human existence. Human emotions exist. Get over it.

Yes, all of these things exist, but it is the women, not the men, who exploit it for financial gain, in terms of child support. And all of these things are controlled by women, not men. This is because it is the females that control the sex life of every species on the planet. Whilst sex may be a goal for males, it is not a goal for females. For females, the goal is pregnancy. This is a universal biological fact. By inventing child support legislation, we have attached a huge bag of money to the female goal, at the expense of the male goal. Totally unethical. Interesting how durable unethical legislations can last.
 
Men always have the option of just saying "no" and keeping their pants zipped. I've not heard of many cases of women raping men.

It's absolutely ridiculous to say that getting pregnant is 100% in women's control when it's not. There are a lot of accidental pregnancies, but this is a fact that goes unacknowledged because it doesn't fit in with the narrative of the crazy right-wingers who are obsessed with female sexuality.

So, are you saying that women don't have the option of saying no?

The thesis is that women have very strong financial incentive to not say no. Plus to fish for more suckers.

Why are you ducking the idea that men somehow can't say no?

Moreover, just why are the right-wing nut jobs so against using available technology to avoid unintended pregnancies in the first place? Gee, we humans invent and use tools to solve problems. This bad habit has been around for a very, very long time. The Hoover dam. Vaccinations to prevent disease. Airplanes. If the Supreme Being had intended us to fly, we would have wings.

And just what is it with the right-wing thing that everybody is a hooker at closing time and sex is dirty? Humans have human emotions. They get into relationships due to mutual affection and attraction. They hug, kiss, mate, and marry. It's appalling that there are "adults" who do not understand the fundamental facts of human life. Human sexuality exists, and is one of the strongest drives in human existence. Human emotions exist. Get over it.

Yes, all of these things exist, but it is the women, not the men, who exploit it for financial gain, in terms of child support. And all of these things are controlled by women, not men. This is because it is the females that control the sex life of every species on the planet. Whilst sex may be a goal for males, it is not a goal for females. For females, the goal is pregnancy. This is a universal biological fact. By inventing child support legislation, we have attached a huge bag of money to the female goal, at the expense of the male goal. Totally unethical. Interesting how durable unethical legislations can last.

WTF??? You are one weird idiot. Apparently you do not understand heterosexuality at the most basic level. You do not understand human beings at the most basic level.
 
Men always have the option of just saying "no" and keeping their pants zipped. I've not heard of many cases of women raping men.

It's absolutely ridiculous to say that getting pregnant is 100% in women's control when it's not. There are a lot of accidental pregnancies, but this is a fact that goes unacknowledged because it doesn't fit in with the narrative of the crazy right-wingers who are obsessed with female sexuality.

So, are you saying that women don't have the option of saying no?

The thesis is that women have very strong financial incentive to not say no. Plus to fish for more suckers.

Why are you ducking the idea that men somehow can't say no?

Moreover, just why are the right-wing nut jobs so against using available technology to avoid unintended pregnancies in the first place? Gee, we humans invent and use tools to solve problems. This bad habit has been around for a very, very long time. The Hoover dam. Vaccinations to prevent disease. Airplanes. If the Supreme Being had intended us to fly, we would have wings.

And just what is it with the right-wing thing that everybody is a hooker at closing time and sex is dirty? Humans have human emotions. They get into relationships due to mutual affection and attraction. They hug, kiss, mate, and marry. It's appalling that there are "adults" who do not understand the fundamental facts of human life. Human sexuality exists, and is one of the strongest drives in human existence. Human emotions exist. Get over it.

Yes, all of these things exist, but it is the women, not the men, who exploit it for financial gain, in terms of child support. And all of these things are controlled by women, not men. This is because it is the females that control the sex life of every species on the planet. Whilst sex may be a goal for males, it is not a goal for females. For females, the goal is pregnancy. This is a universal biological fact. By inventing child support legislation, we have attached a huge bag of money to the female goal, at the expense of the male goal. Totally unethical. Interesting how durable unethical legislations can last.

WTF??? You are one weird idiot. Apparently you do not understand heterosexuality at the most basic level. You do not understand human beings at the most basic level.

Hehehe. Typical to democrats is, that they run out quickly of arguments. When you legislate about stealing money and lining your feminist packets with it, then you have to cook up more than just emotions, or someone will catch the trickery in your logic. Hehehe.
 
Crying for a link is so cheap, that you can't find your support for your counter-argument even in the dollar store. Really? I held you in higher esteem before.
`
If one is keeping count, asking a far right extremism for a link that provides facts, evidence and/or proof of a claim, will net you plenty of excuses, but never any proof.
`
`
5b3.jpg
 
Crying for a link is so cheap, that you can't find your support for your counter-argument even in the dollar store. Really? I held you in higher esteem before.
`
If one is keeping count, asking a far right extremism for a link that provides facts, evidence and/or proof of a claim, will net you plenty of excuses, but never any proof.
`
`

5b3.jpg

Okay. Here are a few proofs then straight from the English dictionary. Do I have to link the English dictionary? "Baby Momma"; "Sugar Daddy"; "Child Support Expert"; "Jail Bait"; "Welfare Queen"; "Ghetto Cow"; They all exist purely by accident, and not by the financial legislative trickery that this thread proposed a fix for. Hehe.
 
Feminist legislation has eliminated female responsibility and today the primary source of democrat voting demography is financially motivated unmarried pregnancy.

Therefore my proposal for a legislative change is to allow child support only if the mother can show a marriage certificate with the father for the time of the birth of the child.

Discuss.
This is unmitigated ignorance and idiocy.

There is no ‘feminist legislation.’

In fact, the entire post is meaningless gibberish – it looks like the product of translation software.

Child support is the responsibility of the father to pay; it’s the mother’s responsibility to report to the appropriate state agency any information she might have as to the father – where he lives and where he works, for example.

It’s then the responsibility of the courts to determine who the father is, how much child support he should pay, and the manner in which it’s payed, pursuant to state child support enforcement laws.

You are missing. The point. There will be no child support unless the mother is married to the father. Isn't that an improvement?

Men have to marry whoever they impregnate. What about affairs the men have what will they do if they knock the mistress up?

:lol:

Child support ring a bell?
 
Feminist legislation has eliminated female responsibility and today the primary source of democrat voting demography is financially motivated unmarried pregnancy.

Therefore my proposal for a legislative change is to allow child support only if the mother can show a marriage certificate with the father for the time of the birth of the child.

Discuss.

So a guy can't get laid unless he gets married first? #cockblocker :lol:
No Elvis. Just be prepared to share YOUR million$ supporting YOUR child for the next 18 year$. "Pay-to-play."
 

Forum List

Back
Top