David Catron’s fabulous article about Jonathan Gruber and eugenics might bring an important topic to the fore where it belongs although there is not much chance media ghouls will touch it. Republican Thomas Massie in these two brief videos is a good start:
Please read the article because there is far too much in Catron’s piece for me to cover the Democrat party’s long running butchery. Eugenics goes all the way back to the Progressive Movement in the early 1900s. Suffice to say that Progressive Movement eugenics was responsible for the philosophical force that gave the modern world totalitarian government mass murders. Today, Progressives call themselves liberals.
I want to single out one well-known item that shows that Democrats are committed to funding abortion with tax dollars —— the very thing they have been lying about for years:
NOTE: John Kerry, as foul a piece of lying scum that ever lived, pulled a Gruber when he let the truth slip out in 2003:
Democrats prefer putting illegal aliens on the welfare state rather than dismantle the welfare state. Their solution to overpopulation is killing infants and the elderly rather than maintaining a stable population.
Conclusion: Democrats prefer killing. Even with many foreign governments putting in with our federal government’s policy of eugenics, I cannot see how the butchers can ever catch up on the killing worldwide. Question: How many billions will be eugenically disposed of in order to satiate Socialism’s bloodlust?
Finally, Taqiyya the Liar’s load of crap:
also says “You did not get your morality on your on. You got help from government butchers.”
Frankly, I can get along without federal government morality that teaches killing.
Please read the article because there is far too much in Catron’s piece for me to cover the Democrat party’s long running butchery. Eugenics goes all the way back to the Progressive Movement in the early 1900s. Suffice to say that Progressive Movement eugenics was responsible for the philosophical force that gave the modern world totalitarian government mass murders. Today, Progressives call themselves liberals.
I want to single out one well-known item that shows that Democrats are committed to funding abortion with tax dollars —— the very thing they have been lying about for years:
Considering his views on the subject, it is virtually certain that Gruber was also involved in the decision to require insurance carriers to include abortion coverage in policies sold through Obamacare exchanges.
Thus, despite the President’s guarantee to gulls like former congressman Bart Stupak that Obamacare would not fund abortions, a recent report from the Government Accountability Office indicates that 1,036 health plans sold through exchanges in 28 states cover “abortion services.” Is it reasonable to associate this with eugenics? To answer that question, it’s necessary to contrast those who insist on the coverage of abortions with the people who actually avail themselves of these “services.” Oddly enough, it is primarily middle class white progressives who push abortion on demand, but most of those who send their unborn babies to “Elsewhere” are women of color.
Most white progressives claim abortion on demand is about “reproductive freedom.” Gruber’s paper suggests that it’s really about controlling the growth of inconvenient segments of the population.
Thus, despite the President’s guarantee to gulls like former congressman Bart Stupak that Obamacare would not fund abortions, a recent report from the Government Accountability Office indicates that 1,036 health plans sold through exchanges in 28 states cover “abortion services.” Is it reasonable to associate this with eugenics? To answer that question, it’s necessary to contrast those who insist on the coverage of abortions with the people who actually avail themselves of these “services.” Oddly enough, it is primarily middle class white progressives who push abortion on demand, but most of those who send their unborn babies to “Elsewhere” are women of color.
XXXXX
Most white progressives claim abortion on demand is about “reproductive freedom.” Gruber’s paper suggests that it’s really about controlling the growth of inconvenient segments of the population.
Obamacare and Eugenics
Is “positive selection” a part of PPACA’s cost control strategy?
By David Catron – 12.15.14
Obamacare and Eugenics The American Spectator
Is “positive selection” a part of PPACA’s cost control strategy?
By David Catron – 12.15.14
Obamacare and Eugenics The American Spectator
NOTE: John Kerry, as foul a piece of lying scum that ever lived, pulled a Gruber when he let the truth slip out in 2003:
In any event, John Kerry let the true reason behind abortion slip out in his losing bid for the presidency:
But Kerry has gone what in better days would have been universally held to be one bridge too far. In a speech last year to the NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner, he gave an intellectually suicidal summary of his views.
He began by saying that "there is no overturning of Roe v. Wade." He went on: "There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or health." That statement of course begs the question on which the entire Congress and the state legislatures and the Supreme Court have been stalled for years, namely, Is the invocation of "health," if made by the woman alone, conclusive in authorizing abortion? If so, Roe v. Wade, which did not authorize willful third-trimester abortions, stands to be revised as the Roe-Wade-Kerry decision.
Kerry continued: "There (shall be) no more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world." This endorses abortion Chinese-style. Too many people? Too few abortions.
But the eye-popper was still to come: "We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."
But Kerry has gone what in better days would have been universally held to be one bridge too far. In a speech last year to the NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner, he gave an intellectually suicidal summary of his views.
He began by saying that "there is no overturning of Roe v. Wade." He went on: "There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or health." That statement of course begs the question on which the entire Congress and the state legislatures and the Supreme Court have been stalled for years, namely, Is the invocation of "health," if made by the woman alone, conclusive in authorizing abortion? If so, Roe v. Wade, which did not authorize willful third-trimester abortions, stands to be revised as the Roe-Wade-Kerry decision.
Kerry continued: "There (shall be) no more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world." This endorses abortion Chinese-style. Too many people? Too few abortions.
But the eye-popper was still to come: "We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."
Democrats prefer putting illegal aliens on the welfare state rather than dismantle the welfare state. Their solution to overpopulation is killing infants and the elderly rather than maintaining a stable population.
Conclusion: Democrats prefer killing. Even with many foreign governments putting in with our federal government’s policy of eugenics, I cannot see how the butchers can ever catch up on the killing worldwide. Question: How many billions will be eugenically disposed of in order to satiate Socialism’s bloodlust?
Finally, Taqiyya the Liar’s load of crap:
also says “You did not get your morality on your on. You got help from government butchers.”
Frankly, I can get along without federal government morality that teaches killing.
