Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Researchers conducting a 5-year-long study examining snow cover in a northern hardwood forest region found that projected changes in climate could lead to a 95 percent reduction of deep-insulating snowpack in forest areas across the northeastern United States by the end of the 21st century. The loss of snowpack would likely result in a steep reduction of forests' ability to store climate-changing carbon dioxide and filter pollutants from the air and water.
Snowpack declines may stunt tree growth and forests' ability to store carbon emissions
The world does not need more accelerating feedbacks to AGW but, as Stephen Crane told us, the fact has not created in the Universe any sense of responsibility.
You criticizing anyone for their knowledge of the scientific method is about as ironic as ironic can get.
Compared to Chinese CO2 emissions, this is a rounding error. Focus!Researchers conducting a 5-year-long study examining snow cover in a northern hardwood forest region found that projected changes in climate could lead to a 95 percent reduction of deep-insulating snowpack in forest areas across the northeastern United States by the end of the 21st century. The loss of snowpack would likely result in a steep reduction of forests' ability to store climate-changing carbon dioxide and filter pollutants from the air and water.
Snowpack declines may stunt tree growth and forests' ability to store carbon emissions
The world does not need more accelerating feedbacks to AGW but, as Stephen Crane told us, the fact has not created in the Universe any sense of responsibility.
So... you have no concern about the well being of the planet's flora and fauna. Got it.
You have projected that the Earth will not get warmer, that sea levels will not rise, that alternative energy sources will not work, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Your 3 posts in this thread this afternoon are your first contribution to any of this forum's discussion in months. You aren't qualified to characterize anyone's habits here.
He also has the use of logical fallacies down pat...if you have no critical thinking skills, that one is a must.Your 3 posts in this thread this afternoon are your first contribution to any of this forum's discussion in months. You aren't qualified to characterize anyone's habits here.
ANYONE with a brain is qualified to characterize YOUR habits because they never change. You are the same lying twit now, that you were when you first showed up here. You STILL can't provide empirical evidence for any of your claims (we can) all you can do is spout off BS from propagandist websites like climate reanalyzer....
In other words, junior, step up your game because you're boring as hell.
True New Mexico has had two blizzard warnings for the majority of the state in the last week. Last year there were only certain regions hit.It means what it clearly states. A loss of snowpack leads to reduced growth in such trees.
Weird, considering it is snowing MORE...
Trees grow better in the snow? This is truly new scientific knowledge.
Cold weather and lack of moisture stunts growth. Not thinner snow packs.I believe the effect is due to stunted growth. Perhaps you should have read the article first.
"The experiments we conducted suggest snowpack declines result in more severe soil freezing that damages and kills tree roots, increases losses of nutrients from the forest and significantly reduces growth of the iconic sugar maple trees."
