"Red" States, "Blue" States....Why.

They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

LOL!!! The only "historically familiar" thing about this is the scam that tries to equate liberals with Communists. Well, drink deep you're the "Reds" now. :badgrin:
Scam? What are you a junior communist propagandist???? I've never heard something so goddamn dumb in the last 24 hours. This is idiocy even for you kommiekonnie.

Still scamming I see! :cool:
 
LOL!!! The only "historically familiar" thing about this is the scam that tries to equate liberals with Communists. Well, drink deep you're the "Reds" now. :badgrin:
Scam? What are you a junior communist propagandist???? I've never heard something so goddamn dumb in the last 24 hours. This is idiocy even for you kommiekonnie.

Still scamming I see! :cool:
I'm sorry. When does basic political historical knowledge become a scam? Are we in backwards land again?
 
From the OP:


2. "It's beginning to look like a suburban swimming pool,'' the television anchor David Brinkley noted on election night 1980, as hundreds of Republican-blue light bulbs illuminated NBC's studio map, signaling a landslide victory for Ronald Regan over the Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter. Other staffers, Time magazine wrote, called it ''Lake Reagan.''



Mr. Carter's bulbs were red."
Ideas & Trends; One State, Two State, Red State, Blue State - Page 2 - New York Times

Ah. So Republicans should be blue?
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.
 
Ah. So Republicans should be blue?
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party
 
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

I'm sure they met and had many meetings on how to make Republicans look like Communists
 
Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is an apparatus of the democrat party

I'm sure they met and had many meetings on how to make Republicans look like Communists
Naw; they just play follow the leader, tools that they are...

It's why their audience numbers are in the sh***ter
 
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

I can't decide whether wingy is oblivious to the nature of the main stream media as mere amanuenses, or his post is as dishonest as the title of his avi....

...no, he can't have missed that folks like Matthews and Stephanopoulos and others moved from employment by the Democrats to paid shills....
 
Ah. So Republicans should be blue?
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.
Why do you think everything in the world must have some sort of political oversight, control and involvement by an officially recognized group or party?

It's a conspiracy of small minds and small scales, not some grand arching scheme. Note, I use the word 'conspiracy' in the small sense meaning like minds getting together in agreement and acting similarly, independent of one another.

This is how it works. Liberals realize that red is the color of communism as has been the case since 1848. This is no surprise for it, and they don't mind it. The problem they have is everyone who ISN'T a communist (which is far too many for their tastes) sees this as a BAD thing and therefore avoids them. They have a public relations and branding nightmare.

So in a little public manipulation, someone who understands the issue says "hey, what is also the color red?" The answer: Threat. This is ingrained in our psychological mindset since man figured out what color is. US Military puts friendly forces in blue, for trust, and enemy forces in red, therefore, do the same to their political enemies. So they spread their idea to the news producers in the media, of like mind, who say 'yeah! that's a great idea!'.

Being partisan hacks, the change is made and when confronted, they lie, 'color is arbitrary'. The change is complete, and people go... uhhh didn't the GOP used to be 'blue' last election? Why'd it change?

So. If the color truely is an 'innocent and arbitrary change', change it back to it's traditional roots with the communis... I mean democrat party. Let's have a coin flip to determine who gets what color maybe?

Of course, any nod/wink media type knows this is bullshit and will refuse.
 
Last edited:
Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

I can't decide whether wingy is oblivious to the nature of the main stream media as mere amanuenses, or his post is as dishonest as the title of his avi....

...no, he can't have missed that folks like Matthews and Stephanopoulos and others moved from employment by the Democrats to paid shills....

I have already agreed with you PC. It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Republicans are Commies. I'm surprised that Palin or Bachmann have not picked up on it

But then again, they are not of your intellectual calibre
 
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.
Why do you think everything in the world must have some sort of political oversight, control and involvement by an officially recognized group or party?

It's a conspiracy of small minds and small scales, not some grand arching scheme. Note, I use the word 'conspiracy' in the small sense meaning like minds getting together in agreement and acting similarly, independent of one another.

This is how it works. Liberals realize that red is the color of communism as has been the case since 1848. This is no surprise for it, and they don't mind it. The problem they have is everyone who ISN'T a communist (which is far too many for their tastes) sees this as a BAD thing and therefore avoids them. They have a public relations and branding nightmare.

So in a little public manipulation, someone who understands the issue says "hey, what is also the color red?" The answer: Threat. This is ingrained in our psychological mindset since man figured out what color is. US Military puts friendly forces in blue, for trust, and enemy forces in red, therefore, do the same to their political enemies. So they spread their idea to the news producers in the media, of like mind, who say 'yeah! that's a great idea!'.

Being partisan hacks, the change is made and when confronted, they lie, 'color is arbitrary'. The change is complete, and people go... uhhh didn't the GOP used to be 'blue' last election? Why'd it change?

So. If the color truely is an 'innocent and arbitrary change', change it back to it's traditional roots with the communis... I mean democrat party. Let's have a coin flip to determine who gets what color maybe?

Of course, any nod/wink media type knows this is bullshit and will refuse.

The Democratic Party never ever had red as its tradtional color. You're an idiot.
 
They had been traditionally when color was used for party. Progressives and socialists liked the color red long throughout history. It's only a recent phenomenon in the US they are running scared from their historically familiar color.

Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

So every one of the conservative media outlets out there who happily use the red/blue standard were somehow manipulated by the Democrats to do so?

Is that an indication of the weak will of the Right,

or an indication of the weak state of your mind?
 
Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.
Why do you think everything in the world must have some sort of political oversight, control and involvement by an officially recognized group or party?

It's a conspiracy of small minds and small scales, not some grand arching scheme. Note, I use the word 'conspiracy' in the small sense meaning like minds getting together in agreement and acting similarly, independent of one another.

This is how it works. Liberals realize that red is the color of communism as has been the case since 1848. This is no surprise for it, and they don't mind it. The problem they have is everyone who ISN'T a communist (which is far too many for their tastes) sees this as a BAD thing and therefore avoids them. They have a public relations and branding nightmare.

So in a little public manipulation, someone who understands the issue says "hey, what is also the color red?" The answer: Threat. This is ingrained in our psychological mindset since man figured out what color is. US Military puts friendly forces in blue, for trust, and enemy forces in red, therefore, do the same to their political enemies. So they spread their idea to the news producers in the media, of like mind, who say 'yeah! that's a great idea!'.

Being partisan hacks, the change is made and when confronted, they lie, 'color is arbitrary'. The change is complete, and people go... uhhh didn't the GOP used to be 'blue' last election? Why'd it change?

So. If the color truely is an 'innocent and arbitrary change', change it back to it's traditional roots with the communis... I mean democrat party. Let's have a coin flip to determine who gets what color maybe?

Of course, any nod/wink media type knows this is bullshit and will refuse.

The Democratic Party never ever had red as its tradtional color. You're an idiot.
:wtf:
:rofl:
:cuckoo:

Sooooooo auTHORative! Just throw that lack of credibility around why don't you?
 
Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

So every one of the conservative media outlets out there who happily use the red/blue standard were somehow manipulated by the Democrats to do so?

Is that an indication of the weak will of the Right,

or an indication of the weak state of your mind?

The Lamestream media tricked them......

They offered them a choice between Red or Pink and Republicans chose Red
 
It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

I can't decide whether wingy is oblivious to the nature of the main stream media as mere amanuenses, or his post is as dishonest as the title of his avi....

...no, he can't have missed that folks like Matthews and Stephanopoulos and others moved from employment by the Democrats to paid shills....

I have already agreed with you PC. It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Republicans are Commies. I'm surprised that Palin or Bachmann have not picked up on it

But then again, they are not of your intellectual calibre

The title to your post: The Truth Disguised As "Humor"


But, if I may refine it, and bring it closer to the truth....

....It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Democrats aren't first cousins to Commies.
 
Since the Democratic party did not decide what color scheme the media would settle on, your fascinating opinion is stupid.

It is simply and illustration of the degree to which the media is ab apparatus of the democrat party

So every one of the conservative media outlets out there who happily use the red/blue standard were somehow manipulated by the Democrats to do so?

Is that an indication of the weak will of the Right,

or an indication of the weak state of your mind?

Come on man become aware; they belong to the same community of thought and philosophy and politics; nothing more is required. Weak will, conspiracy, and collusion are canards.
 
Last edited:
I can't decide whether wingy is oblivious to the nature of the main stream media as mere amanuenses, or his post is as dishonest as the title of his avi....

...no, he can't have missed that folks like Matthews and Stephanopoulos and others moved from employment by the Democrats to paid shills....

I have already agreed with you PC. It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Republicans are Commies. I'm surprised that Palin or Bachmann have not picked up on it

But then again, they are not of your intellectual calibre

The title to your post: The Truth Disguised As "Humor"


But, if I may refine it, and bring it closer to the truth....

....It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Democrats aren't first cousins to Commies.

Oh you naive little minx....

Convincing America that Republicans are the Red Party is only the first part. They eventually want to rename the Republican Party "The American Communist Party"

Ever heard of something called "The slippery slope"?
 
I have already agreed with you PC. It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Republicans are Commies. I'm surprised that Palin or Bachmann have not picked up on it

But then again, they are not of your intellectual calibre

The title to your post: The Truth Disguised As "Humor"


But, if I may refine it, and bring it closer to the truth....

....It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Democrats aren't first cousins to Commies.

Oh you naive little minx....

Convincing America that Republicans are the Red Party is only the first part. They eventually want to rename the Republican Party "The American Communist Party"

Ever heard of something called "The slippery slope"?

How silly of you to give me this opportunity:



1. While the United States is one of the few democracies without an official socialist party, in reality socialist occupy some of the highest positions in the “Marxist-socialist” bloc in Congress. In fact, the Congressional Progressive Caucus was founded as a sister to the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

a. Before the socialist network infiltrated the Democratic Party, its ideology permeated academic institutions for decades.

b. In the 60’s, radicals attempted to overthrow the US capitalist system by actual revolution: the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) or its spinoff, the Weathermen terrorist group. DSA was established to transform capitalism by democratic means.

2. Creation of the Progressive Caucus is credited to Bernie Sanders. The groups in the radical network include a) the Congressional Progressive Caucus, b) the Congressional Black Caucus, c) the Populist Caucus, and the d) Progressive Democrats of America.

a. Allied with the above is ACORN, SEIU, and the Institute for Policy Studies

b. And, indirectly, the Center for American Progress and the Apollo Alliance.

3. DSA/USA, the "Democratic Socialists of America" are the U.S. arm of the Socialist International. They share the symbol of the fist holding the rose, and they share the tasks to be accomplished - in our case, an altogether different America. You may verify all this at Democratic Socialists of America.
The above credited to Aaron Kllein, in "The Red Army."


Guess what color one finds as the logo of the 'Democrat Socialists of America"?

Right...RED! I guess I should say 'Left....RED.'



And...

"Barack Obama was, in fact, a member of the socialist New Party in the 1990s and sought its endorsement for the Illinois senate--contrary to the misrepresentations of Obama's presidential campaign in 2008,..."
Obama Caught Lying Again: He Was Member of 'New Party,' Says Kurtz



Hey....is your face RED, or what?
 
"Socialists" in the Democratic Party? I thought the reason Democrats are full of shit was they support Israel, while Hillary is a former Goldwater Girl, and the first thing Obama did as President was try to copy a Republican's healthcare scam, he left energy and environmental policy for later (maybe never), then he kills more people with drones, in four years, than GW did, in eight years. I guess anything with centralized funding means you are socialist, as long as a Democrat is in the White House.

Can even one wingnut distinguish, between social welfare and special-interest socialism, without slipping in his own, slimy feces? Wingnut shit is all over available media.


What shit!
 
The title to your post: The Truth Disguised As "Humor"


But, if I may refine it, and bring it closer to the truth....

....It is an obviously diabolical scheme by the Lamestream media to convince Americans that Democrats aren't first cousins to Commies.

Oh you naive little minx....

Convincing America that Republicans are the Red Party is only the first part. They eventually want to rename the Republican Party "The American Communist Party"

Ever heard of something called "The slippery slope"?

How silly of you to give me this opportunity:



1. While the United States is one of the few democracies without an official socialist party, in reality socialist occupy some of the highest positions in the “Marxist-socialist” bloc in Congress. In fact, the Congressional Progressive Caucus was founded as a sister to the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

a. Before the socialist network infiltrated the Democratic Party, its ideology permeated academic institutions for decades.

b. In the 60’s, radicals attempted to overthrow the US capitalist system by actual revolution: the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) or its spinoff, the Weathermen terrorist group. DSA was established to transform capitalism by democratic means.

2. Creation of the Progressive Caucus is credited to Bernie Sanders. The groups in the radical network include a) the Congressional Progressive Caucus, b) the Congressional Black Caucus, c) the Populist Caucus, and the d) Progressive Democrats of America.

a. Allied with the above is ACORN, SEIU, and the Institute for Policy Studies

b. And, indirectly, the Center for American Progress and the Apollo Alliance.

3. DSA/USA, the "Democratic Socialists of America" are the U.S. arm of the Socialist International. They share the symbol of the fist holding the rose, and they share the tasks to be accomplished - in our case, an altogether different America. You may verify all this at Democratic Socialists of America.
The above credited to Aaron Kllein, in "The Red Army."


Guess what color one finds as the logo of the 'Democrat Socialists of America"?

Right...RED! I guess I should say 'Left....RED.'



And...

"Barack Obama was, in fact, a member of the socialist New Party in the 1990s and sought its endorsement for the Illinois senate--contrary to the misrepresentations of Obama's presidential campaign in 2008,..."
Obama Caught Lying Again: He Was Member of 'New Party,' Says Kurtz



Hey....is your face RED, or what?

I, for one, am impressed

You managed to both cut AND paste on one post

But never mind. We got you good. Now in the mind of all Americans they are confused with the Red of the Communist Party and the Red of the Republicab party. Is it the same? Do Republicans really belong to the Communist Party?

You really can't be sure can you?

Better be safe and vote for the blue party
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top