Red Lobster suspends waitress after she was insulted with a racial slur

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Luddly Neddite, Sep 14, 2013.

  1. Sunshine
    Offline

    Sunshine Trust the pie. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    19,377
    Thanks Received:
    3,038
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +3,051
    And apparently to be an unnamed school shooter as well.
     
  2. Asclepias
    Offline

    Asclepias Work Hard Play Hard

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    72,397
    Thanks Received:
    6,073
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Breathing rarified air.
    Ratings:
    +20,597
    I dont see anything yet about the expert going to court. Seem more like an attempt to sway public opinion. When the expert gets into court and says something that exposed him to perjury then I can trust him. I doubt he will do that. Right now it just looks like he was paid to say the guy didn't write it.
     
  3. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    35,749
    Thanks Received:
    4,964
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +16,739
    Then the other side can bring thier expert in to say he did write it, and thier analysis can be taken into account.

    This has been out a few days now, one would think there would be some refuting done by another expert, but it hasnt happened yet.

    There are countless examples of made up stories of racism, this wouldnt be any different.
     
  4. Asclepias
    Offline

    Asclepias Work Hard Play Hard

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    72,397
    Thanks Received:
    6,073
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Breathing rarified air.
    Ratings:
    +20,597
    Why would you think that? No expert is going to refute anything unless they too test his writing. This is a company with corporate attorneys. I'm sure they are not going to expose their hand. Right now all this guy is doing is making noise to see if he can settle out of court. Thats how the game works.
     
  5. Uncensored2008
    Offline

    Uncensored2008 Libertarian Radical Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    64,690
    Thanks Received:
    8,291
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Behind the Orange Curtain
    Ratings:
    +28,728
    Can't be fraud unless money is involved.

    Basically she is a scumbag - but that is not a criminal offense.

    Yes, she and Red Lobster are being sued for Libel and Defamation.

    Unfortunately, the Darden Group, owners of Red Lobster, will be the ones who pay - the "deep pockets" game used in our injustice system.
     
  6. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,658
    Thanks Received:
    7,425
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,360
    It doesn't matter whether the waitress was lying. It SHOULD have been true because even a lie is justice. The customer SHOULD have written a racial slur so he DID, whether he really did or not.

    The kind of people who fake a racist attack by setting themselves on fire are the kind of people who would do anything to fake a racist incident.

    Police: Sharmeka Moffitt Lied About Attack, Set Herself On Fire (VIDEO)
     
  7. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    35,749
    Thanks Received:
    4,964
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +16,739
    So there is ZERO chance this waitress or someone else besides the person being accused wrote in the word "******."

    The new analyses being brought to light go against your preferred view of the event. Thus attacking the messanger is the only thing you have.

    The anaylsis of the handwriting is out there for all to see, I'm sure if there is something wrong with said anaylsis someone will counter the experts claims.
     
  8. Asclepias
    Offline

    Asclepias Work Hard Play Hard

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    72,397
    Thanks Received:
    6,073
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Breathing rarified air.
    Ratings:
    +20,597
    I cant tell if you first sentence is a question or a statement. Assuming it is a question there is always a chance that he is innocent and that she or someone else wrote it.

    I'm not attacking the messenger. I'm saying people have been paid before to lie or color the truth and I'm pretty sure its not an isolated incident.

    You cant critic the analysis unless you too test the handwriting. No expert is going to risk damage to their career claiming he is wrong without testing for themselves and coming up with a different conclusion.
     
  9. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    35,749
    Thanks Received:
    4,964
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +16,739
    If this person is purely doing it for the money and falsifying thier analysis, I'm sure somone else in the profession would be ALL OVER them about it. The samples are in the open, and availible for another expert to check at thier leisure.

    Here is the resume of the document examiner, he has an impressive CV, as well as the proper professional associations.

    http://www.asqde.org/vastrick/vitae.pdf
     
  10. Asclepias
    Offline

    Asclepias Work Hard Play Hard

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    72,397
    Thanks Received:
    6,073
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Breathing rarified air.
    Ratings:
    +20,597
    Why would they be all over him if they don't have their own handwriting sample to work with? That would be pretty stupid. Just because you are "sure" doesn't make true.

    Resumes dont make people honest. Why would you think that because someone has a resume they must be telling the truth?
     

Share This Page