Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
Fun watching mental midget wrestling
It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
looking in the mirror I see.
again the senate is also pushing an extreme risk protection act Trump has pushed for a red flag bill to sign try and keep up.It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
It will never survive the Senate, nor constitutional muster. Trump will refuse to sign it even if the Senate fucks up and passes it, which is not likely because McConnell will not bring anything to a vote that Trump will not sign.
I believe you have gone full retardThe cops were only enforcing the SOCIALIST mayors laws. They want their taxes on a couple cigarettes. Stand it their way and you die.Personally I don't think there should be a law that says you can't sell your cigarettes.They've murdered over loose cigarettes so no surprise if you're unwilling to give up your personal 2nd A right. theyll just kill you. Problem solved!Of course it's just about guns. Police have already murdered over it.So it's just about the guns and not safety? They could take their vehicle and use it as a weapon? Take a bat and use it? or a sharpe object create a fire and burn down a house or two? So it's not about safety are you sure?
This topic has been covered extensively in other threads. Why are you continuing to lie about it?
Have you gone full libtard?
What in the fuck is wrong with you?It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
You mean this bill:
All Info - H.R.1236 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2019
The one that has only been passed by the Judiciary committee 22-16?
That one?
The one that you claimed had already passed the House?
I hate stupid people and liars.
Which are you?
Don't play stupid with meHow many extreme risk protection bills are there at the federal level?How many days does this bill allow for confinement for someone who was issued an extreme risk protection order?So the gang bangers breaking the law and mowing down folks they come across are patriots, McFraud?
Again, 3rd time, what bill are you talking about?
How many days does this bill allow for confinement for someone who was issued an extreme risk protection order?
Why don't you provide a link to the bill and we can help you read it?
https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/publ...ba3f-a290d7cd5231/ferpo-one-pager---final.pdf
Text - H.R.3076 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2019
Your ‘understanding’ is both wrong and ridiculous.My understanding is all they do is take the guns or kill you. I don't know if they detain them, but i'm sure some examination is required.OK but that doesn't address my questionThey rejected an amendment allowing police to target gangs with the law. Democrats did this.If these democrat backed red flag bill becomes law and a person has one taken out on them how long will they be confined to watch and see how they act?
How many days does this bill allow for confinement for someone who was issued an extreme risk protection order?
A judge issues a protective order during an ex parte procedure.
A hearing is later convened to allow the gunowner to demonstrate that his guns should be returned.
No guns are ‘confiscated,’ no one is ‘killed,’ and citizens are afforded comprehensive due process.
I bet when Robert Francis said we are going to take your AR15's Clayton's head was spinning trying to figure out a way to say no one wants to take your guns.Your ‘understanding’ is both wrong and ridiculous.My understanding is all they do is take the guns or kill you. I don't know if they detain them, but i'm sure some examination is required.OK but that doesn't address my questionThey rejected an amendment allowing police to target gangs with the law. Democrats did this.If these democrat backed red flag bill becomes law and a person has one taken out on them how long will they be confined to watch and see how they act?
How many days does this bill allow for confinement for someone who was issued an extreme risk protection order?
A judge issues a protective order during an ex parte procedure.
A hearing is later convened to allow the gunowner to demonstrate that his guns should be returned.
No guns are ‘confiscated,’ no one is ‘killed,’ and citizens are afforded comprehensive due process.
Are the weapons in my possession? Then they were confiscated. Prove you are not a jibbering jackass. It is nearly impossible to prove a negative. Jackass.
How did they define "gangs"? Would it include my aunt's tai chi class?They rejected an amendment allowing police to target gangs with the law. Democrats did this.If these democrat backed red flag bill becomes law and a person has one taken out on them how long will they be confined to watch and see how they act?
They rejected an amendment allowing police to target gangs with the law. Democrats did this.If these democrat backed red flag bill becomes law and a person has one taken out on them how long will they be confined to watch and see how they act?
I believe you have gone full retardThe cops were only enforcing the SOCIALIST mayors laws. They want their taxes on a couple cigarettes. Stand it their way and you die.Personally I don't think there should be a law that says you can't sell your cigarettes.They've murdered over loose cigarettes so no surprise if you're unwilling to give up your personal 2nd A right. theyll just kill you. Problem solved!Of course it's just about guns. Police have already murdered over it.
This topic has been covered extensively in other threads. Why are you continuing to lie about it?
Have you gone full libtard?
again the senate is also pushing an extreme risk protection act Trump has pushed for a red flag bill to sign try and keep up.It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
It will never survive the Senate, nor constitutional muster. Trump will refuse to sign it even if the Senate fucks up and passes it, which is not likely because McConnell will not bring anything to a vote that Trump will not sign.
Now tell me why isn't anyone making a provision for confinement and observation? If you can't answer move along.
Go fuck yourself communist pigI believe you have gone full retardThe cops were only enforcing the SOCIALIST mayors laws. They want their taxes on a couple cigarettes. Stand it their way and you die.Personally I don't think there should be a law that says you can't sell your cigarettes.They've murdered over loose cigarettes so no surprise if you're unwilling to give up your personal 2nd A right. theyll just kill you. Problem solved!
This topic has been covered extensively in other threads. Why are you continuing to lie about it?
Have you gone full libtard?
No. You lie like a liberal.
Go fuck yourself you have no fucking concept about this threadagain the senate is also pushing an extreme risk protection act Trump has pushed for a red flag bill to sign try and keep up.It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
It will never survive the Senate, nor constitutional muster. Trump will refuse to sign it even if the Senate fucks up and passes it, which is not likely because McConnell will not bring anything to a vote that Trump will not sign.
Now tell me why isn't anyone making a provision for confinement and observation? If you can't answer move along.
How about it is a fact that doesn't agree with your perception? Why did you lie and say it passed the House?
Go fuck yourself communist pigI believe you have gone full retardThe cops were only enforcing the SOCIALIST mayors laws. They want their taxes on a couple cigarettes. Stand it their way and you die.Personally I don't think there should be a law that says you can't sell your cigarettes.
This topic has been covered extensively in other threads. Why are you continuing to lie about it?
Have you gone full libtard?
No. You lie like a liberal.
Go fuck yourself you have no fucking concept about this threadagain the senate is also pushing an extreme risk protection act Trump has pushed for a red flag bill to sign try and keep up.It's called the extreme risk protection order actRed Flag is just a name so far. We don't know what's in it or how it would be implemented or what the penalties are or even if there are sneaky little details about confiscation. The fact that anti-2nd amendment democrats are in favor of it is suspicious but my guess is that it isn't even written and democrats are using the phrase to pretend that they are doing something.
It will never survive the Senate, nor constitutional muster. Trump will refuse to sign it even if the Senate fucks up and passes it, which is not likely because McConnell will not bring anything to a vote that Trump will not sign.
Now tell me why isn't anyone making a provision for confinement and observation? If you can't answer move along.
How about it is a fact that doesn't agree with your perception? Why did you lie and say it passed the House?
Are Congressional supports of this legislation looking to confine the people for observation for whom just had their guns confiscated?They rejected an amendment allowing police to target gangs with the law. Democrats did this.If these democrat backed red flag bill becomes law and a person has one taken out on them how long will they be confined to watch and see how they act?
Dear Fake Fox News Brainwashed Idiot. Democrats were correct in preventing police from confiscating guns from gangs. Otherwise government would take weapons from gun clubs, militias, protesters, gated HOA communities, hunting clubs, ex-gang members defending home & family against violent street drug gangs, Bikers, Truckers, KKK members, Gang of 6 Congressmen, anyone with a Rebel Flag or Confederate memorabilia, ect.
