Record-shattering 2.7-million-year-old ice core reveals start of the ice ages

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Mar 16, 2010
59,455
6,793
1,900
The Good insane United states of America
Record-shattering 2.7-million-year-old ice core reveals start of the ice ages
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017...lion-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages
By Paul VoosenAug. 15, 2017 , 12:15 PM
Scientists announced today that a core drilled in Antarctica has yielded 2.7-million-year-old ice, an astonishing find 1.7 million years older than the previous record-holder. Bubbles in the ice contain greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere at a time when the planet’s cycles of glacial advance and retreat were just beginning, potentially offering clues to what triggered the ice ages. That information alone makes the value of the sample “incredible,” says David Shuster, a geochemist at the University of California, Berkeley, who is unaffiliated with the research. “This is the only sample of ancient Earth’s atmosphere that we have access to.”

Described at the Goldschmidt Conference in Paris by Yuzhen Yan, a graduate student at Princeton University, the ice revealed atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels that did not exceed 300 parts per million, well below today’s levels. Some models of ancient climate predict that such relatively low levels would be needed to tip Earth into a series of ice ages. But some proxies gleaned from the fossils of animals that lived in shallow oceans had indicated higher CO2 levels. If the new result holds up, says Yige Zhang, a paleoclimatologist at Texas A&M University in College Station, the proxies will need to be recalibrated. “We have some work to do.”

The discovery also points the way to finding even older ice, because it comes from a largely ignored “blue ice” area, where peculiar dynamics can preserve old layers. Although blue ice areas offer only a fragmentary view of the past, they may turn into prime hunting grounds for ancient ice, says Ed Brook, a geochemist on the discovery team at Oregon State University in Corvallis. “Ice that’s this old really makes people stand up and notice,” he says. “We’re just scratching the surface.”

Impressive! We should learn a lot from this.
 
And the bullshit just keeps on coming. The ice age that the earth is presently still in the process of exiting began between 20 and 40 million years ago depending on whether you start it at the time that ice started forming at the poles, or whether you start it at the point that ice sheets began covering the continents.

2.7 million years ago was merely the end of the previous interglacial period before glaciation started again and continued till about 10,000 years ago. There is a large difference between a glacial period and an ice age... Ice age is defined by the existence of ice at the poles...for most of the earth's history, there has been no ice at either pole...Ice at the poles is the anomaly on earth...not the norm.
 
And the bullshit just keeps on coming. The ice age that the earth is presently still in the process of exiting began between 20 and 40 million years ago depending on whether you start it at the time that ice started forming at the poles, or whether you start it at the point that ice sheets began covering the continents.

2.7 million years ago was merely the end of the previous interglacial period before glaciation started again and continued till about 10,000 years ago. There is a large difference between a glacial period and an ice age... Ice age is defined by the existence of ice at the poles...for most of the earth's history, there has been no ice at either pole...Ice at the poles is the anomaly on earth...not the norm.
This ice age will last until Antarctica moves away from the South Pole, or until it collides with some other continent and blocks the circumpolar current. That won't happen for at least another 20 to 40 million years.
 
Be that as it may, the information from this new core is invaluable.
Of what value exactly could it be if the people in possession of it don't know the difference between an ice age and a glacial period?...pearls before swine.
 
Record-shattering 2.7-million-year-old ice core reveals start of the ice ages
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017...lion-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages
By Paul VoosenAug. 15, 2017 , 12:15 PM
Scientists announced today that a core drilled in Antarctica has yielded 2.7-million-year-old ice, an astonishing find 1.7 million years older than the previous record-holder. Bubbles in the ice contain greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere at a time when the planet’s cycles of glacial advance and retreat were just beginning, potentially offering clues to what triggered the ice ages. That information alone makes the value of the sample “incredible,” says David Shuster, a geochemist at the University of California, Berkeley, who is unaffiliated with the research. “This is the only sample of ancient Earth’s atmosphere that we have access to.”

Described at the Goldschmidt Conference in Paris by Yuzhen Yan, a graduate student at Princeton University, the ice revealed atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels that did not exceed 300 parts per million, well below today’s levels. Some models of ancient climate predict that such relatively low levels would be needed to tip Earth into a series of ice ages. But some proxies gleaned from the fossils of animals that lived in shallow oceans had indicated higher CO2 levels. If the new result holds up, says Yige Zhang, a paleoclimatologist at Texas A&M University in College Station, the proxies will need to be recalibrated. “We have some work to do.”

The discovery also points the way to finding even older ice, because it comes from a largely ignored “blue ice” area, where peculiar dynamics can preserve old layers. Although blue ice areas offer only a fragmentary view of the past, they may turn into prime hunting grounds for ancient ice, says Ed Brook, a geochemist on the discovery team at Oregon State University in Corvallis. “Ice that’s this old really makes people stand up and notice,” he says. “We’re just scratching the surface.”

Impressive! We should learn a lot from this.
It's exactly what I have been saying and it doesn't mean what you think it means.
 

Forum List

Back
Top