Real GDP Collapse: 1.7% For Year...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by paulitician, Jan 27, 2012.

  1. paulitician
    Offline

    paulitician Platinum Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Messages:
    38,401
    Thanks Received:
    4,136
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,972
    That's the final, pathetic growth number for 2011.


    From the just-released GDP report:

    Real GDP increased 1.7 percent in 2011 (that is, from the 2010 annual level to the 2011 annual level), compared with an increase of 3.0 percent in 2010.

    The increase in real GDP in 2011 primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, and nonresidential fixed investment that were partly offset by negative contributions from state and local government spending, private inventory investment, and federal government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased.

    Not exactly a barnburner.




    Read more: 2011 GDP: 1.7%
     
  2. TakeAStepBack
    Offline

    TakeAStepBack Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    13,935
    Thanks Received:
    1,723
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,012
    Bush did it.
     
  3. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,593
    Thanks Received:
    4,583
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,081
    Obama will blame Bush for it all the way to 2016 if he gets a second term. The guy will not take the heat for his economy. Reason to throw him out!
     
  4. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    I wish it were as good as 1.7%.

    It is really 0.4%

    News Release: Gross Domestic Product and Corporate Profits

    Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property
    located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 1.0 percent in the second quarter of 2011,
    (that is, from the first quarter to the second quarter), according to the "second" estimate released by the
    Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the first quarter, real GDP increased 0.4 percent.
     
  5. Claudette
    Online

    Claudette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    19,553
    Thanks Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,609
    Have no fear

    Its all Bush's fault.

    Barry should sail in for his second term.
     
  6. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    55,976
    Thanks Received:
    9,333
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,523
    Do you understand what you read?

    0.4% is the figure for the FIRST QUARTER. Not for the year.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. 8537
    Offline

    8537 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,754
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New England's West Coast
    Ratings:
    +729
    ^needs course in reading comprehension. You even took the time to put your ignorance in bold print.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    55,976
    Thanks Received:
    9,333
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,523
    And the Fed said a couple days ago that growth for 2012 will be lower than 2011. And they said they will keep interest rates low through 2014, which I find the most attention-worthy bit of all. That they actually give a date, and one that far out, for keeping interest rates low is a terrible omen.

    The Fed historically has never given out-to dates. Then last fall they said they would keep interest rates around zero out to the beginning of 2013. My jaw hit the floor when I first saw that.

    And now they are saying to the end of 2014.

    Not only that, Bernanke indicated another round of quantitative easing is back on the table.


    It's the damned euro crisis and financial derivatives. Same stupid derivatives reindeer games, same players on Wall Street. The only difference from the 2008-present global credit crisis is the underlying assets in the financial WMDs. We are back at the abyss, and this time the rubes won't be able to blame the CRA or negroes for it.

    Maybe then everyone will wake up to the real problems, the real causes. And the real solutions that are necessary.

    If you don't like Occupy Wall Streeters or socialists or poor people, you better get used to them. Wall Street is going to make a lot more of them.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2012
  9. JimH52
    Offline

    JimH52 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,187
    Thanks Received:
    3,087
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    US
    Ratings:
    +8,141
  10. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    55,976
    Thanks Received:
    9,333
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,523
    The Fed's outlook has dimmed. GDP is trending downward at the moment. Stock market volumes are sluggish. Everyone is holding their breath over the euro crisis.

    There are tense negotiations going on right now between Greece and its bondholders. A lot of credit event horizons are in the balance.

    Someone is going to have to take it in the shorts, and everyone knows its the bondholders. The question is exactly how the default will be defined.

    If they screw this up, there will be a very nasty financial chain reaction. Thermonuclear.

    Better to have been paying attention all along than try to figure it out later and look for the nearest scapegoat. Like the CRA or something...
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2012

Share This Page