hortysir
In Memorial of 47
- Thread starter
- #21
Apparently, from public records, it all started back in 2007The rent would go to the bank now...NOT the old land lord. As it stands now the land lord does not own the property... the bank does.
Sending a check to the old land lord is just money in his pocket. It would suck to have to pay rent twice.
If the rent is supposed to go to the bank now, I imagine the bank would have made that known to the tenants.
My guess is that the property is still the property of the original landlord for now, and until it isn't, the rent goes to that landlord, until you hear differently. The bank isn't going to come up in 2 weeks and say "whoops, you were supposed to pay us and we didn't tell you, so now you have to pay us even if you already paid the old owner".
I think horty is jumping the gun.
Good question.
horty.... has the property been foreclosed on...or in the process of foreclosure ?