Rasmussen still sees Dems holding Senate

[JimH52]

Election 2010: Senate Balance Of Power - Rasmussen Reports

And this is a GOP pollster.

 

[fyrenza]

You know what?

Is this another of those Scare Tactics to motivate the voters?

Let's wait, at LEAST until folks are actually VOTING,

'cuz I've got news for you:

Make the dims "comfortable," and they'll SKIP the hassle of going to the polls.

Make the repugs nervous, and they'll be SURE to get to the polls.

Oh.

On second thought,

CARRY ON!

 

[LibocalypseNow]

I tend to agree. Winning the Senate back seemed pretty unrealistic to me all along. If the Republicans can just make some gains and make the Senate close again,that will be a nice enough victory for me. Just make it close again. Once it's close,this awful Socialist/Progressive agenda is over.

 

[Missourian]

RCP Projection:


Democrats 48

Republicans 46

Toss-ups

CA: Boxer (D)
CO: Bennet (D)
IL: Open (D)
NV: Reid (D)
WA: Murray (D)
WV: Open (D)

​

RealClearPolitics - 2010 Election Maps - Battle for the Senate

 

[Mad Scientist]

Gridlock is the new Black!

 

[Dr.House]

Most people I know think the democratics will keep control of the Senate...

It'll be by fewer seats, so that means a better shot at my coveted gridlock, so....

The House going R is what matters most for true gridlock to start... Friggin' sweet...

 

[Dr.House]

RCP Projection:


Democrats 48

Republicans 46

Toss-ups

CA: Boxer (D)
CO: Bennet (D)
IL: Open (D)
NV: Reid (D)
WA: Murray (D)
WV: Open (D)

​

RealClearPolitics - 2010 Election Maps - Battle for the Senate

Did you see Feingold's seat is "Lean's Republican"...

at least one half of McCain/Feingold should be tossed in November...

 

[R.C. Christian]

What difference does it make if you control the senate but the people you elect to replace the current human scum are more filthy neocons and corporate puppets? People like Fiorna should be put against a wall and shot. The point being simply that in some cases you'd be better off with the incumbent. Such is the situation in Arkansas, and California but you can't make the retards here see past their rightful anger.

 

[R.C. Christian]

As long as Reid loses the planets will align. We couldn't get rid of that useless scumbag Rangel thanks to the interference of slick willie but by god the citizens of Nevada can definitely rid DC of that tyrant Reid.

 

[uscitizen]

I just hope the republicans lose a senate seat in KY.

 

[Londoner]

You can tell Rove does not want to win the Senate -- that's partly why he dumped on the Delaware witch.

Having the House allows the GOP to destroy the Obama agenda, but having the House and the Senate means the GOP risks getting tainted by the lingering Bush fart that will consume the next several years.

Best to throw Obama a hot potato and blame him for dropping it.

Rove doesn't want the Senate for good reason. The GOP doesn't want to get dragged into the hole they placed Obama in.

 

[uscitizen]

You can tell Rove does not want to win the Senate -- that's partly why he dumped on the Delaware witch.

Having the House allows the GOP to destroy the Obama agenda, but having the House and the Senate means the GOP risked getting tainted by the lingering Bush fart that will consume the next several years.

Best to throw Obama a hot potato and blame him for dropping it.

Rove doesn't want the Senate for good reason. The GOP doesn't want to get dragged into the hole they placed Obama in.

A plausable idea there.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You can tell Rove does not want to win the Senate -- that's partly why he dumped on the Delaware witch.

Having the House allows the GOP to destroy the Obama agenda, but having the House and the Senate means the GOP risked getting tainted by the lingering Bush fart that will consume the next several years.

Best to throw Obama a hot potato and blame him for dropping it.

Rove doesn't want the Senate for good reason. The GOP doesn't want to get dragged into the hole they placed Obama in.

A plausable idea there.

The democrats could not lead with over 240 House members and 60 Senators. They sure as hell won't lead with less Senators. Unlike the Republicans under Bush.

 

[uscitizen]

You can tell Rove does not want to win the Senate -- that's partly why he dumped on the Delaware witch.

Having the House allows the GOP to destroy the Obama agenda, but having the House and the Senate means the GOP risked getting tainted by the lingering Bush fart that will consume the next several years.

Best to throw Obama a hot potato and blame him for dropping it.

Rove doesn't want the Senate for good reason. The GOP doesn't want to get dragged into the hole they placed Obama in.

A plausable idea there.

The democrats could not lead with over 240 House members and 60 Senators. They sure as hell won't lead with less Senators. Unlike the Republicans under Bush.

LMAO Think a bit about what you just posted.
It is not very pro republican if you consider what the republican led congress did under Bush.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

A plausable idea there.

The democrats could not lead with over 240 House members and 60 Senators. They sure as hell won't lead with less Senators. Unlike the Republicans under Bush.

LMAO Think a bit about what you just posted.
It is not very pro republican if you consider what the republican led congress did under Bush.

Only to retards. the point is with 56 Senators the Republicans PASSED shit and LEAD. The Democrats couldn't do it with 60.

 

[uscitizen]

Of course the republicans are a more cohesive force than the dems. Bush did not veto anything till the dems started to get in power did he?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Of course the republicans are a more cohesive force than the dems. Bush did not veto anything till the dems started to get in power did he?

The Democrats controlled the Senate for 2 years before 2006.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Yes, they passed legislation alright, legislation written by credit card companies for example and subsequently rubber stamped by Bush. Of course, it goes without saying that whatever war funding was needed they approved and then some.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Yes, they passed legislation alright, legislation written by credit card companies for example and subsequently rubber stamped by Bush. Of course, it goes without saying that whatever war funding was needed they approved and then some.

Including the 4 years the Senate was Democratic and the 2 years the House was Democratic.

Did you forget Barney Frank insisting just a month or so before the Housing collapse that Fannie and Freddie were sound and fine and that any new regulations would hurt them? He INSISTED the housing market was just fine while he and Dodd took payoffs from Mortgage companies and blocked any attempt to regulate the Industry.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Yes, they passed legislation alright, legislation written by credit card companies for example and subsequently rubber stamped by Bush. Of course, it goes without saying that whatever war funding was needed they approved and then some.

Including the 4 years the Senate was Democratic and the 2 years the House was Democratic.

Did you forget Barney Frank insisting just a month or so before the Housing collapse that Fannie and Freddie were sound and fine and that any new regulations would hurt them? He INSISTED the housing market was just fine while he and Dodd took payoffs from Mortgage companies and blocked any attempt to regulate the Industry.

No, I'm simply trying to impress upon your or whomever else cares that the democrats were not alone in their treachery.

As for Barney Frank, I can't legally state what I'd like to see happen to that useless tyrant.