Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Politics or human rights?Rep Tlaib just showed everyone that politics are more important than her family. Here’s an idea, do not use Grandma as a political prop!
Apartheid?!!? LMAO. Impossible to have apartheid against terrorists."If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.".Apartheid?!!? LMAO. Impossible to have apartheid against terrorists.
"Desmond Tutu"
Don't dance with Israeli Apartheid! - BDS Italia
You love radical Islam? What a winner you are.You love radical Islam? What a winner you are
Did you vote for this Loser?
Who did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
Bullshit propagandaIsrael is among the most racist states on this planet which probably explains its high approval rating among Trump's ChumpsBullshit propaganda
"In 2007, in advance of a report from the United Nations Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteur John Dugard said that 'Israel's laws and practices in the OPT [occupied Palestinian territories] certainly resemble aspects of apartheid.'
"Dugard asked: 'Can it seriously be denied that the purpose [...] is to establish and maintain domination by one racial group (Jews) over another racial group (Palestinians) and systematically oppressing them?'[110][111]
"In October 2010, Richard A. Falk reported to the General Assembly Third Committee that 'the nature of the occupation as of 2010 substantiates earlier allegations of colonialism and apartheid in evidence and law to a greater extent than was the case even three years ago.'
"Falk described it as a 'cumulative process' and said 'the longer it continues...the more serious is the abridgment of fundamental Palestinian rights.'"
Israel and the apartheid analogy - Wikipedia
Arafat never negotiated in good faith.
Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist LikudParty) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and refused to make an immediate counter-offer.[97] He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet."[111]Arafat knew he would follow in the footsteps of Yitzhak Rabin if he ever signed away the Right of Return for the millions of non-Jews who had their homes, businesses, and bank accounts stolen by Jews in 1948:Arafat never negotiated in good faith.
Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist LikudParty) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip
2000 Camp David Summit - Wikipedia
"Due to the first Arab-Israeli war, a significant number of Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled from their homes inside what is now Israel.
"These refugees numbered approximately 711,000 to 725,000 at the time. Today, they and their descendants number about four million, comprising about half the Palestinian people.
"Since that time, the Palestinians have demanded full implementation of the right of return, meaning that each refugee would be granted the option of returning to his or her home, with property restored, and receive compensation.
"Israelis asserted that allowing a right of return to Israel proper, rather than to the newly created Palestinian state, would mean an influx of Palestinians that would fundamentally alter the demographics of Israel, jeopardizing Israel's Jewish character and its existence as a whole."
To be clear. Arafat was offered a Palestinian state and he turned it down because he was a disingenuous asshole.
Who did you for POTUS in 2016 and why?Who controlled the air space above this alleged Palestinian state?To be clear. Arafat was offered a Palestinian state and he turned it down because he was a disingenuous asshole.
Apartheid?!!? LMAO. Impossible to have apartheid against terrorists."If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.".Apartheid?!!? LMAO. Impossible to have apartheid against terrorists.
"Desmond Tutu"
Don't dance with Israeli Apartheid! - BDS Italia
You love radical Islam? What a winner you are.You love radical Islam? What a winner you are
Did you vote for this Loser?
Who did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
The actual winner was President Trump"If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.".
"Desmond Tutu"
Don't dance with Israeli Apartheid! - BDS Italia
You love radical Islam? What a winner you are.You love radical Islam? What a winner you are
Did you vote for this Loser?
Who did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
The actual winner.
"If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.".
"Desmond Tutu"
Don't dance with Israeli Apartheid! - BDS Italia
You love radical Islam? What a winner you are.You love radical Islam? What a winner you are
Did you vote for this Loser?
Who did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
So you didn't participate
That's probably a plus for the country.
The actual winner was President TrumpYou love radical Islam? What a winner you are.You love radical Islam? What a winner you are
Did you vote for this Loser?
Who did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
The actual winner.
They approved, but they made all kinds of restrictions.
Israel claims they’re a democracy like the United States used to be.
Politics or human rights?Rep Tlaib just showed everyone that politics are more important than her family. Here’s an idea, do not use Grandma as a political prop!
If the person is using their family as a prop, it’s a distinction without a difference. If Rep Tlaib wants to criticize Israel, that is her right. However, it speaks volumes when you bring Your grandmother into the discussion to set up a “gotcha” moment.
If the person's grandmother, along with millions of other non-Jews, is being used as a pawn by agents of a racist, illegal occupation, the only "gotcha" moment reveals how afraid the Jews of Israel are about their apartheid and injustice being revealed by a member of the US Congress.If the person is using their family as a prop, it’s a distinction without a difference. If Rep Tlaib wants to criticize Israel, that is her right. However, it speaks volumes when you bring Your grandmother into the discussion to set up a “gotcha” moment
They approved, but they made all kinds of restrictions.
Israel claims they’re a democracy like the United States used to be.
You do realize that arabs and jew are not races? There is no occupation. It's Israel's land.Politics or human rights?Rep Tlaib just showed everyone that politics are more important than her family. Here’s an idea, do not use Grandma as a political prop!
If the person is using their family as a prop, it’s a distinction without a difference. If Rep Tlaib wants to criticize Israel, that is her right. However, it speaks volumes when you bring Your grandmother into the discussion to set up a “gotcha” moment.If the person's grandmother, along with millions of other non-Jews, is being used as a pawn by agents of a racist, illegal occupation, the only "gotcha" moment reveals how afraid the Jews of Israel are about their apartheid and injustice being revealed by a member of the US Congress.If the person is using their family as a prop, it’s a distinction without a difference. If Rep Tlaib wants to criticize Israel, that is her right. However, it speaks volumes when you bring Your grandmother into the discussion to set up a “gotcha” moment
Perhaps because they support Terrorism.Why did the allegedly democratic state of Israel deny two members of the US Congress admission to their racist, apartheid nation in the first place?
They approved, but they made all kinds of restrictions.
Israel claims they’re a democracy like the United States used to be.
Which is exactly the reason Progs hate Israel so much...They approved, but they made all kinds of restrictions.
Israel claims they’re a democracy like the United States used to be.
Israel is the beacon of democracy in the shit hole that is the Middle East.
Israel is among the most racist states on this planet which probably explains its high approval rating among Trump's Chumps
"In 2007, in advance of a report from the United Nations Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteur John Dugard said that 'Israel's laws and practices in the OPT [occupied Palestinian territories] certainly resemble aspects of apartheid.'
"Dugard asked: 'Can it seriously be denied that the purpose [...] is to establish and maintain domination by one racial group (Jews) over another racial group (Palestinians) and systematically oppressing them?'[110][111]
"In October 2010, Richard A. Falk reported to the General Assembly Third Committee that 'the nature of the occupation as of 2010 substantiates earlier allegations of colonialism and apartheid in evidence and law to a greater extent than was the case even three years ago.'
"Falk described it as a 'cumulative process' and said 'the longer it continues...the more serious is the abridgment of fundamental Palestinian rights.'"
Israel and the apartheid analogy - Wikipedia
Arafat never negotiated in good faith.
Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist LikudParty) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and refused to make an immediate counter-offer.[97] He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet."[111]Arafat knew he would follow in the footsteps of Yitzhak Rabin if he ever signed away the Right of Return for the millions of non-Jews who had their homes, businesses, and bank accounts stolen by Jews in 1948:Arafat never negotiated in good faith.
Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist LikudParty) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip
2000 Camp David Summit - Wikipedia
"Due to the first Arab-Israeli war, a significant number of Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled from their homes inside what is now Israel.
"These refugees numbered approximately 711,000 to 725,000 at the time. Today, they and their descendants number about four million, comprising about half the Palestinian people.
"Since that time, the Palestinians have demanded full implementation of the right of return, meaning that each refugee would be granted the option of returning to his or her home, with property restored, and receive compensation.
"Israelis asserted that allowing a right of return to Israel proper, rather than to the newly created Palestinian state, would mean an influx of Palestinians that would fundamentally alter the demographics of Israel, jeopardizing Israel's Jewish character and its existence as a whole."
To be clear. Arafat was offered a Palestinian state and he turned it down because he was a disingenuous asshole.
Who did you for POTUS in 2016 and why?Who controlled the air space above this alleged Palestinian state?To be clear. Arafat was offered a Palestinian state and he turned it down because he was a disingenuous asshole.
Who was the President of “Palestine” in 1946?
'BDS Is a Bullshit Purity Test' for Dems: Bill Mahers Rants Against Boycott Israel Group
It wasn't George V (or Bill Mahers)Who was the President of “Palestine” in 1946?
'BDS Is a Bullshit Purity Test' for Dems: Bill Mahers Rants Against Boycott Israel Group
The actual winner was President Trump
Did you vote for this Loser?
Who did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
The actual winner.
Yes that was who I voted for. I answered His Question. He voted for a fruitcake.
You were conned.Yes that was who I voted for. I answered His Question. He voted for a fruitcake.
Arafat never negotiated in good faith.
Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist LikudParty) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian percentage of sovereignty would extend to 90 percent over a ten- to twenty-five-year period. Also included in the offer was the return of a small number of refugees and compensation for those not allowed to return. Palestinians would also have "custodianship" over the Temple Mount, sovereignty on all Islamic and Christian holy sites, and three of Jerusalem's four Old City quarters. Arafat rejected Barak's offer and refused to make an immediate counter-offer.[97] He told President Clinton that, "the Arab leader who would surrender Jerusalem is not born yet."[111]Arafat knew he would follow in the footsteps of Yitzhak Rabin if he ever signed away the Right of Return for the millions of non-Jews who had their homes, businesses, and bank accounts stolen by Jews in 1948:Arafat never negotiated in good faith.
Arafat continued negotiations with Netanyahu's successor, Ehud Barak, at the Camp David 2000 Summit in July 2000. Due partly to his own politics (Barak was from the leftist Labor Party, whereas Netanyahu was from the rightist LikudParty) and partly due to insistence for compromise by President Clinton, Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in 73 percent of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip
2000 Camp David Summit - Wikipedia
"Due to the first Arab-Israeli war, a significant number of Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled from their homes inside what is now Israel.
"These refugees numbered approximately 711,000 to 725,000 at the time. Today, they and their descendants number about four million, comprising about half the Palestinian people.
"Since that time, the Palestinians have demanded full implementation of the right of return, meaning that each refugee would be granted the option of returning to his or her home, with property restored, and receive compensation.
"Israelis asserted that allowing a right of return to Israel proper, rather than to the newly created Palestinian state, would mean an influx of Palestinians that would fundamentally alter the demographics of Israel, jeopardizing Israel's Jewish character and its existence as a whole."
To be clear. Arafat was offered a Palestinian state and he turned it down because he was a disingenuous asshole.
Who did you for POTUS in 2016 and why?Who controlled the air space above this alleged Palestinian state?To be clear. Arafat was offered a Palestinian state and he turned it down because he was a disingenuous asshole.
Who was the President of “Palestine” in 1946?
'BDS Is a Bullshit Purity Test' for Dems: Bill Mahers Rants Against Boycott Israel GroupIt wasn't George V (or Bill Mahers)Who was the President of “Palestine” in 1946?
'BDS Is a Bullshit Purity Test' for Dems: Bill Mahers Rants Against Boycott Israel Group
"His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
Balfour Declaration - Wikipedia
Why do you suppose the heroic Zionists required British bayonets to colonize Palestine?
The actual winner was President TrumpWho did you vote for and why?Who did you vote for and why?
Stein billed herself as "Bernie's Plan B"
When corporate Dems nominated Clinton, my "choice" was reduced to one candidate in 2016.
Who was your choice?
The actual winner.
Yes that was who I voted for. I answered His Question. He voted for a fruitcake.You were conned.Yes that was who I voted for. I answered His Question. He voted for a fruitcake.
Don't you feel stupid?
