The Republican front-runner--prominently noted in videotapes worldwide, of the January 1, 2016 Rose Parade skywriting, alone--has now suggested that Radical Islam seeks some nature of confrontation with "The West." To put this in context, like Trump's latest recruiting video seems to suggest--Likely there is no such thing as "Radical Islam." Like anything civilized, there tend to be varietals(?)! The Republicans seem to find it convenient to lump them all into the same brand of Muscatel--and created by Secretary Clinton and Barack Obama(?!).
Radical Islam - Discover the Networks
ISIS and Al Qaeda, for example, are not the same groups. In the link, Al Qaeda rejects concepts of diplomacy, dialogue, accommodation or other assimilation. That puts just them alone: Up against the Sunni and the Shia. The Saudis seem to have issues with Shia clerics, Shia followers tend to have issues with Saudi embassies and consulates. There is no specific rant against the United States. The Republican foreign policy advocates seem to want to portray, "Radical Islam," as specifically on the collision course with: "The West."
For Hare Krishna, USA(?): That seems to portend, mostly atrocities in Culver City, east of Venice Beach--itself where atrocities are alleged to be located, except for the bums all strewn about the beachwalk(?).
"Radical Islam" is likely not too friendly toward the concept of Communist China. Hare Krishna is Vedic, actually not Moslem but more Hindu. Then there are the rest of the other Hindi sects.
There do not exist, apparently sufficient "Radical Islamists:" Able to mount a successful counter-attack against Ramadi, so far. Anyone says, "But look at (all the sand and scorpions) they control(?)!"
The Republicans are showing their rich people's bias. There are only non-issues to be concerned with. Senator Rubio is now famous for not showing up for work. That is the "Establishment Republican." Trump doesn't work at all. That is the Republican, anti-Establishment alternative(?)!
And that all originates with Bush-Cheney saving the world from "Weapons of Mass Destruction(?)!"
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes outlawed "Ghost Dancers," of defeated, on Lands of Many Nations!)
Radical Islam - Discover the Networks
ISIS and Al Qaeda, for example, are not the same groups. In the link, Al Qaeda rejects concepts of diplomacy, dialogue, accommodation or other assimilation. That puts just them alone: Up against the Sunni and the Shia. The Saudis seem to have issues with Shia clerics, Shia followers tend to have issues with Saudi embassies and consulates. There is no specific rant against the United States. The Republican foreign policy advocates seem to want to portray, "Radical Islam," as specifically on the collision course with: "The West."
For Hare Krishna, USA(?): That seems to portend, mostly atrocities in Culver City, east of Venice Beach--itself where atrocities are alleged to be located, except for the bums all strewn about the beachwalk(?).
"Radical Islam" is likely not too friendly toward the concept of Communist China. Hare Krishna is Vedic, actually not Moslem but more Hindu. Then there are the rest of the other Hindi sects.
There do not exist, apparently sufficient "Radical Islamists:" Able to mount a successful counter-attack against Ramadi, so far. Anyone says, "But look at (all the sand and scorpions) they control(?)!"
The Republicans are showing their rich people's bias. There are only non-issues to be concerned with. Senator Rubio is now famous for not showing up for work. That is the "Establishment Republican." Trump doesn't work at all. That is the Republican, anti-Establishment alternative(?)!
And that all originates with Bush-Cheney saving the world from "Weapons of Mass Destruction(?)!"
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes outlawed "Ghost Dancers," of defeated, on Lands of Many Nations!)
Last edited:
