Racial Purity By Nation

[Unkotare]

There is, of course, no such thing as "racial purity." Only the truly stupid could believe such nonsense. Only the truly cowardly would need to.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Sadly , probably the most negrofied area of the South. GA sucks too

Cossack? are you really a Cossack? my grandmother used to refer to the
lowest of the low as "Cossack"-------and--then sorta SPIT

Sounds like something a Jew would say, and do.

right-----Cossacks like to stick their sabers into infants for fun

Most Russians like Cossacks, and most people in the West probably know next to nothing about the Cossacks.

it truly sounds like something a Jew would say.

true---most people in the West do not know what a COSSACK is or why the
germans decided to place their most barbaric death camps in
Poland

[/QUOTE]

Why did Germans decide to place their most barbaric death camps in Poland?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

US has been juded. Mongrelized. For true racial purity one needs to examine Poland , Estonia , Latvia , Belo Russ and other clean Nations. Enjoy.

Not only has Poland remained like 99.9% White.

Poles aren't messing around, a lot of them don't want non-Whites in their country.

Our Diploma Dumbo Media Never Noticed

Long ago but never since, Poland turned the tide against Islam. By the way, what day of the year was the day before the Battle of Vienna?

Yes, my screenname celebrates Polish Jan III Sobieski's victory against Islamic Turks in the Battle of Vienna.

 

[frigidweirdo]

US has been juded. Mongrelized. For true racial purity one needs to examine Poland , Estonia , Latvia , Belo Russ and other clean Nations. Enjoy.

Not really. Half of what is Poland used to be Germany, there is Germanic and Slavic blood mixed together. Estonia, Latvia, etc have Russians in there as well as others. I guess if you manage to define Slavs with Scandinavians with Germanic, then you can try and get some kind of racial purity, but that's cheating.

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

US has been juded. Mongrelized. For true racial purity one needs to examine Poland , Estonia , Latvia , Belo Russ and other clean Nations. Enjoy.

Not really. Half of what is Poland used to be Germany, there is Germanic and Slavic blood mixed together. Estonia, Latvia, etc have Russians in there as well as others. I guess if you manage to define Slavs with Scandinavians with Germanic, then you can try and get some kind of racial purity, but that's cheating.

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

 

[frigidweirdo]

US has been juded. Mongrelized. For true racial purity one needs to examine Poland , Estonia , Latvia , Belo Russ and other clean Nations. Enjoy.

Not really. Half of what is Poland used to be Germany, there is Germanic and Slavic blood mixed together. Estonia, Latvia, etc have Russians in there as well as others. I guess if you manage to define Slavs with Scandinavians with Germanic, then you can try and get some kind of racial purity, but that's cheating.

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

US has been juded. Mongrelized. For true racial purity one needs to examine Poland , Estonia , Latvia , Belo Russ and other clean Nations. Enjoy.

Not really. Half of what is Poland used to be Germany, there is Germanic and Slavic blood mixed together. Estonia, Latvia, etc have Russians in there as well as others. I guess if you manage to define Slavs with Scandinavians with Germanic, then you can try and get some kind of racial purity, but that's cheating.

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

Aryans or Indo-Europeans most likely came from the Pontic Steppe, the DNA evidence, and anthropological evidence back up the Kurgan Expansion.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Not really. Half of what is Poland used to be Germany, there is Germanic and Slavic blood mixed together. Estonia, Latvia, etc have Russians in there as well as others. I guess if you manage to define Slavs with Scandinavians with Germanic, then you can try and get some kind of racial purity, but that's cheating.

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

Aryans or Indo-Europeans most likely came from the Pontic Steppe, the DNA evidence, and anthropological evidence back up the Kurgan Expansion.

And before this? All evidence points towards the same place, somewhere in Africa. Or will you make a stopping point in time that is convenient?

 

[Unkotare]

Cossack? are you really a Cossack? my grandmother used to refer to the
lowest of the low as "Cossack"-------and--then sorta SPIT

Sounds like something a Jew would say, and do.

right-----Cossacks like to stick their sabers into infants for fun

Most Russians like Cossacks, and most people in the West probably know next to nothing about the Cossacks.

it truly sounds like something a Jew would say.

true---most people in the West do not know what a COSSACK is or why the
germans decided to place their most barbaric death camps in
Poland

Why did Germans decide to place their most barbaric death camps in Poland?[/QUOTE]



Because the Poles were too weak to prevent it.

 

[Unkotare]

Not really. Half of what is Poland used to be Germany, there is Germanic and Slavic blood mixed together. Estonia, Latvia, etc have Russians in there as well as others. I guess if you manage to define Slavs with Scandinavians with Germanic, then you can try and get some kind of racial purity, but that's cheating.

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

Aryans or Indo-Europeans most likely came from the Pontic Steppe, the DNA evidence, and anthropological evidence back up the Kurgan Expansion.

Indo-European is a language family, not an ethnicity. This has been explained to you before.

 

[irosie91]

Sounds like something a Jew would say, and do.

right-----Cossacks like to stick their sabers into infants for fun

Most Russians like Cossacks, and most people in the West probably know next to nothing about the Cossacks.

it truly sounds like something a Jew would say.

true---most people in the West do not know what a COSSACK is or why the
germans decided to place their most barbaric death camps in
Poland

Why did Germans decide to place their most barbaric death camps in Poland?

Because the Poles were too weak to prevent it.[/QUOTE]

the Poles, like the Hungarians, were willingly complicit in the
extermination of jews. At the time Auschwitz camp was first
constructed----it was something like a simple prison.(circa 1940)
but shortly thereafter it became a large complex devoted to whole-
sale murder involving mass transit by train ----a system that required
a high level of cooperation by the population since the general
population could SEE what was going on and how it was done.
Such a system could not have existed in countries like Italy or even
France

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

One could also say that much of Germany was Slavic, even Berlin the capital of Germany, was once Slavic Polabian, a Lechite or Polish tribes people, which the name Berlin even comes from Slavic Polabian for swamp.

Germans came to Poland as immigrants.

Look at the Gdansk Massacre in the turn of the 14th century, when Germans first came to Gdansk invited in as "Friends" of Poland, before burning Polish city Gdansk to the ground, and killing up to 10,000 Poles, before promptly bringing in German settlers.

There's much more Slavic DNA in Germans, than German DNA in Slavs.

Because a lot of the Germans absorbed Slavs as they moved East, these also become more elite than other Germans, the Prussians who united Germany.

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

Aryans or Indo-Europeans most likely came from the Pontic Steppe, the DNA evidence, and anthropological evidence back up the Kurgan Expansion.

Indo-European is a language family, not an ethnicity. This has been explained to you before.

The Aryans introduced different DNA to Europe.

 

[Unkotare]

Well it doesn't really matter either way.... it's not racial purity by any stretch of the imagination.

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

Aryans or Indo-Europeans most likely came from the Pontic Steppe, the DNA evidence, and anthropological evidence back up the Kurgan Expansion.

Indo-European is a language family, not an ethnicity. This has been explained to you before.

The Aryans introduced different DNA to Europe.

Stop playing pretend 'science' from stormfront.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

right-----Cossacks like to stick their sabers into infants for fun

Most Russians like Cossacks, and most people in the West probably know next to nothing about the Cossacks.

it truly sounds like something a Jew would say.

true---most people in the West do not know what a COSSACK is or why the
germans decided to place their most barbaric death camps in
Poland

Why did Germans decide to place their most barbaric death camps in Poland?

Because the Poles were too weak to prevent it.

the Poles, like the Hungarians, were willingly complicit in the
extermination of jews. At the time Auschwitz camp was first
constructed----it was something like a simple prison.(circa 1940)
but shortly thereafter it became a large complex devoted to whole-
sale murder involving mass transit by train ----a system that required
a high level of cooperation by the population since the general
population could SEE what was going on and how it was done.
Such a system could not have existed in countries like Italy or even
France[/QUOTE]

Yup, you're a dumb Jew.

Actually Fascist Italy, and Vichy France were bigger collaborators of Nazi Germany than Poland.

Fact is Poland was virtually devoid of Nazi SS units.

Fact is Poland had the highest number of Righteous Among the Nations who risked their lives to save Holocaust victim Jews.

Fact is that while Nazi collaboration were minimal in Poles, or Jews, Jewish historian Emanuel Ringelblum who lived his last days in the Nazi German controlled Warsaw Ghetto had specifically said that Jewish Nazi collaborators of the Jewish Ghetto Police, were worse Nazi collaborators than Polish Nazi collaborators of the Polish Blue Police.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Well, Europeans have all a mixed with 4 types of Caucasoid, being Cro Magnon (WHG), Aryan (EHG) Neolithic Near-Easterners, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG)

These types do differ at different proportions in different European ethnic groups, with Neolithic's being more common in Southern, and Western Europe, Cro Magnons, and Aryans most prevalent in Eastern Europe, and Northern Europe, and Caucasus Hunter Gatherers most prevalent in South-Eastern Europe.

Aryan is Indian in the first place. Hitler just latched on to something and tried to make it his own.


But anyway, I'm not sure why you said this.

Aryans or Indo-Europeans most likely came from the Pontic Steppe, the DNA evidence, and anthropological evidence back up the Kurgan Expansion.

Indo-European is a language family, not an ethnicity. This has been explained to you before.

The Aryans introduced different DNA to Europe.

Stop playing pretend 'science' from stormfront.

So, why were ANE / EHG DNA types absent, or very rare in Europe before the Aryan invasions?

 

[Unkotare]

Sad racist clown

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Sad racist clown

What about the Jewish clown who is blaming Poland for the Holocaust?

 

[irosie91]

Most Russians like Cossacks, and most people in the West probably know next to nothing about the Cossacks.

it truly sounds like something a Jew would say.

true---most people in the West do not know what a COSSACK is or why the
germans decided to place their most barbaric death camps in
Poland

Why did Germans decide to place their most barbaric death camps in Poland?

Because the Poles were too weak to prevent it.

the Poles, like the Hungarians, were willingly complicit in the
extermination of jews. At the time Auschwitz camp was first
constructed----it was something like a simple prison.(circa 1940)
but shortly thereafter it became a large complex devoted to whole-
sale murder involving mass transit by train ----a system that required
a high level of cooperation by the population since the general
population could SEE what was going on and how it was done.
Such a system could not have existed in countries like Italy or even
France

Yup, you're a dumb Jew.

Actually Fascist Italy, and Vichy France were bigger collaborators of Nazi Germany than Poland.

Fact is Poland was virtually devoid of Nazi SS units.

Fact is Poland had the highest number of Righteous Among the Nations who risked their lives to save Holocaust victim Jews.

Fact is that while Nazi collaboration were minimal in Poles, or Jews, Jewish historian Emanuel Ringelblum who lived his last days in the Nazi German controlled Warsaw Ghetto had specifically said that Jewish Nazi collaborators of the Jewish Ghetto Police, were worse Nazi collaborators than Polish Nazi collaborators of the Polish Blue Police.[/QUOTE]

your data proves nothing. ------the general polish population was
complicit. You provide EXCEPTIONS. The survivor of the Ghetto
SAW the collaborating jews and LOGICALLY hated them.
I got my information from all sides---survivors and poles. Regarding
France and Italy-----same thing---from both surviving jews and Italians
and French. ----and then there were the Hungarians----enthusiastic.
The genocide in Poland and Hungary was VERY SUCCESSFUL----
a failure in Italy and France----for good reason. Poland actually had
a fairly well organized and armed resistance and no real "VICHY" type
government-----but the genocide was HIGHLY successful anyway and
supported by the peasantry

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

true---most people in the West do not know what a COSSACK is or why the
germans decided to place their most barbaric death camps in
Poland

Why did Germans decide to place their most barbaric death camps in Poland?

Because the Poles were too weak to prevent it.

the Poles, like the Hungarians, were willingly complicit in the
extermination of jews. At the time Auschwitz camp was first
constructed----it was something like a simple prison.(circa 1940)
but shortly thereafter it became a large complex devoted to whole-
sale murder involving mass transit by train ----a system that required
a high level of cooperation by the population since the general
population could SEE what was going on and how it was done.
Such a system could not have existed in countries like Italy or even
France

Yup, you're a dumb Jew.

Actually Fascist Italy, and Vichy France were bigger collaborators of Nazi Germany than Poland.

Fact is Poland was virtually devoid of Nazi SS units.

Fact is Poland had the highest number of Righteous Among the Nations who risked their lives to save Holocaust victim Jews.

Fact is that while Nazi collaboration were minimal in Poles, or Jews, Jewish historian Emanuel Ringelblum who lived his last days in the Nazi German controlled Warsaw Ghetto had specifically said that Jewish Nazi collaborators of the Jewish Ghetto Police, were worse Nazi collaborators than Polish Nazi collaborators of the Polish Blue Police.

your data proves nothing. ------the general polish population was
complicit. You provide EXCEPTIONS. The survivor of the Ghetto
SAW the collaborating jews and LOGICALLY hated them.
I got my information from all sides---survivors and poles. Regarding
France and Italy-----same thing---from both surviving jews and Italians
and French. ----and then there were the Hungarians----enthusiastic.
The genocide in Poland and Hungary was VERY SUCCESSFUL----
a failure in Italy and France----for good reason. Poland actually had
a fairly well organized and armed resistance and no real "VICHY" type
government-----but the genocide was HIGHLY successful anyway and
supported by the peasantry[/QUOTE]

Oh my goodness, what a stupid Jew you are.

400,000 Poles were in Armia Krajowa fighting the Nazis, while 15,000 Poles were in the Polish Nazi collaborator Blue Police.

So, how do you figure that most Poles were complicate?

 

[Unkotare]

Sad racist clown

What about the Jewish clown who is blaming Poland for the Holocaust?

Who?