Race is a social construct vs Race is part of nature

You sound like one of the people in the crowd in the Emperor's New Clothes!

Screaming that the "there is no such thing as race" won't make race disappear any more than screaming that "there is no such thing as rain" will keep us dry. You're in psycho territory here, Unkotare. Many people scream that GOD doesn't exist, but He does.

Race exists on multiple levels. Biological, evolutionary, genetic, DNA-wise, aesthetically, culturally, linguistically, politically, you name it. We SEE race. We OBSERVE IT. We can scrutinize it UNDER A FREAKIN' MICROSCOPE!

When a white dude goes to Harlem, he NOTICES he's white. The blacks there NOTICE he's white. Go to China: they are not confused about whether race exist. One of the most "racist" groups on Earth are the Japanese -- a la your own avatar. They don't even like the 2 percent of the population that is Ainu!
 
Sure it is.

Richard Lynn, Sarich, Miele, Salter, the Bell Curve, Vanhannan -- there's an endless list of scientists who affirm the existence of race and racial difference. It was once a mainstay of academics and anthropology, only to be taken down by political forces.

James Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA, observed that black Africa will never equal Europe because its people are less intelligent.

William Pierce, the founder of the National Alliance, was actually... a rocket scientist.

William Shockley, a Silicon Valley pioneer, wrote extensively on the topic of the reality of race.

Charles Darwin, who originated evolutionary thinking, called his book, "On the Origin of the Species: and the struggle for survival of the favored races."

shit, yo.
 
race=construct to define physical appearance and genetical makeup based on ancestry like european, african, indian, east asian etc. is that correct?

ethnic groups of the same "race" are genetically and physically and maybe culturally too less different then ethnic groups of two different "races" but how much can you be different and still be the "same race" thats where the human mind is asked and without human definition there couldnt be a race in society on census etc. black skin and white skin still would exist but without definition of race they could be just different types like midgets and giants, are midgets and giants two different races? thats why its a construct but with loosely based on phsyical/biological characteristics and genetic similarity.

"Race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species."
If thats the case then whites technically are not homo sapiens. Whites are mixed with neanderthals.
 


I have studied that and reject it. Genetic mapping can tell you where your ancestors came from and skin is a major organ of the body, it is not superficial.

There is an extremely large leftwing political bias at work here reminiscent of the stalin era, there have been many mistruths propagated such as the fact that when comparing any two gaussian distributions it is always true that intra race variation is always greater than inter race, but that is a misleading, that is not how we compare gaussian type distributions since mathematically it is a tautology. Stephen Gould lied about cranial measurements ( Semitic Controversies: Lies, Damned Lies and Stephen Jay Gould ), there was a lie published on a transracial adoption study Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In a 1998 article, Scarr wrote: "The test performance of the Black/Black adoptees [in the study] was not different from that of ordinary Black children reared by their own families in the same area of the country. My colleagues and I reported the data accurately and as fully as possible, and then tried to make the results palatable to environmentally committed colleagues. In retrospect, this was a mistake. The results of the transracial adoption study can be used to support either a genetic difference hypothesis or an environmental difference one (because the children have visible African ancestry). We should have been agnostic on the conclusions.

Many scientists are desperate to prove leftist dogma, the reality in front of us will not let them, the bottom line is that all available data we have points to lower intelligence in blacks, there is no reason at all to think the brain was immune to evolution while the skin and skeletal-muscular structure were.

Mainstream Science on Intelligence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. "Members of all racial-ethnic groups can be found at every IQ level"
  2. "The bell curve for whites is centered roughly around IQ 100; the bell curve for American blacks roughly around 85; and those for different subgroups of Hispanics roughly midway between those for whites and blacks. The evidence is less definitive for exactly where above IQ 100 the bell curves for Jews and Asians are centered"
  3. "IQ is strongly related, probably more so than any other single measurable human trait, to many important educational, occupational, economic, and social outcomes ... Whatever IQ tests measure, it is of great practical and social importance"
  4. "A high IQ is an advantage because virtually all activities require some reasoning and decision-making"
  5. "The practical advantages of having a higher IQ increase as life’s settings become more complex"
  6. "Differences in intelligence certainly are not the only factor affecting performance in education, training, and complex jobs ... but intelligence is often the most important"
  7. "Certain personality traits, special talents, [etc] are important ... in many jobs, but they have narrower (or unknown) applicability or ‘transferability’ across tasks and settings compared with general intelligence"
  8. "Heritability estimates range from 0.4 to 0.8 ... indicating genetics plays a bigger role than environment in creating IQ differences"
 
Last edited:


And what is your training in Biology?

LOL at it again eh fucktard, you have no trouble posting shit you don't know anything about but I never ask you your credentials because that would be a logical fallacy. I know you are too damned stupid to understand, but keep trying douchenozzle. I love it that you can never attack the actual argument, shows what a nitwit you are
 

Forum List

Back
Top