IndependntLogic
Senior Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 2,997
- 399
- 48
- Thread starter
- #61
[/QUOTE]I'll bite. Even if this is a little biased. I'm new to this board and want to leave because the name calling is beyond ridiculous. So any real discussion is hard to find.
I'm an independent/Ron Paul supporter by the way.
1. No, TP is worried about other things.
2. I at least want our interpretation to at least be in the same ball park. Sarbanes Oxley is about protecting investors and no power of Congress is even close to explaining how they have that power.
In a lawful sense, the constitution is meant to be interpreted by judges. However, the end all power goes to the people so they are allowed to usurp that. That means every one should be vocal and force more common sense into interpretation.
3. No
4. Debatable. I certainly wouldn't worry about it right now.
5. All.
6. Most of these agencies could be done at the state level. No reason to give a central government that is easily corrupted that much power.
I need a comprehensive list to give my opinion, so I have no official position on these. I would need more time to think about/talk about it/study it before I formed a true position.
7. ?
8. Not a federal government/Congress power. Could be done at the state/county/city/local/citizen level.
9. Equal rights wins.
10. Equal rights wins.
11. Needs to be done. I really like the fair tax. But same position as 6.
12. Don't care.
13. Don't care
14. Don't care
15. Every one makes mistakes so everyone in the US is at fault.
16. Don't torture
17. Every one makes mistakes so everyone in the US is at fault.
18. Federal government shouldn't be concerned about anything corporate wise unless it is breaking rights. You can worry about all of this at the state level.
19. Don't care
20. Get rid of a ton of federal power, worry about this later on the state level.
!
Thanks. Good post.