Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The more people you arm the more crazy people you arm. You might increase the odds in some cases someone thwarts a crime or saves lives,
but the other hand you might increase the odds that when some nut goes over the edge, the fact that he already has easily obtainable weapons might make the consequences worse.
No one was talking about ARMING CRAZY people!The more people you arm the more crazy people you arm. You might increase the odds in some cases someone thwarts a crime or saves lives,
but the other hand you might increase the odds that when some nut goes over the edge, the fact that he already has easily obtainable weapons might make the consequences worse.
Question:who would you rather be behind if a crazy person started shooting...
A big fat guy?
Rush Limbaugh maybe?
Clearly not...can't you read?
WHERE DID YOU SAY YOU WERE or WEREN'T ARMED???
The implication was YOU were armed but legally couldn't respond!
So you are even DUMBER then you indicated!
SO you are NOT qualified to discuss obviously because common sense is NOT something you have because YOU DUCKED... Why did you stay at the stoplight?
Could have driven off obviously out of danger.. but no YOU DUCKED waiting like a sitting duck !
Idiot!
Moron, I was responding for Si, I am not Si. Can you get that through your thick skull? I have spent more time carrying weapons, in shitty parts of the world, than you ever will in your entire misbegotten life.
I suggest you follow your own bloody advice and LOOK AT WHO POSTED THE BLOODY MESSAGE YOU IDIDOT!
Such a silly statement.
The primary argument is not to eliminate the 2nd Amendment but to regulate assault weapons and large capacity magazines.
a person with a hand gun or a person with no hand gun?
Not a complicated question and one that Bill Clinton endorsed to the tune of $120 million!
Marking the first anniversary of the
shooting deaths at Columbine High School, President Clinton announced $120 million in new federal grants Saturday to place more police officers in schools and
Bill Clinton Calls for Armed Guards at Schools : 4yourcountry
a person with a hand gun or a person with no hand gun?
Not a complicated question and one that Bill Clinton endorsed to the tune of $120 million!
Marking the first anniversary of the
shooting deaths at Columbine High School, President Clinton announced $120 million in new federal grants Saturday to place more police officers in schools and
Bill Clinton Calls for Armed Guards at Schools : 4yourcountry
Such a silly statement.
The primary argument is not to eliminate the 2nd Amendment but to regulate assault weapons and large capacity magazines.
a person with a hand gun or a person with no hand gun?
Not a complicated question and one that Bill Clinton endorsed to the tune of $120 million!
Marking the first anniversary of the
shooting deaths at Columbine High School, President Clinton announced $120 million in new federal grants Saturday to place more police officers in schools and
Bill Clinton Calls for Armed Guards at Schools : 4yourcountry
First they came for the assault weapons, but as I had no assault weapon, I said nothing, then they came for concealed carry Hand guns, but as I had no concealed carry Hand guns, I said nothing, then they came for the shotguns, and I had a shotgun, but nobody came to help me
Why would you want to HIDE behind another person?
Clearly not...can't you read?
WHERE DID YOU SAY YOU WERE or WEREN'T ARMED???
The implication was YOU were armed but legally couldn't respond!
So you are even DUMBER then you indicated!
SO you are NOT qualified to discuss obviously because common sense is NOT something you have because YOU DUCKED... Why did you stay at the stoplight?
Could have driven off obviously out of danger.. but no YOU DUCKED waiting like a sitting duck !
Idiot!
Moron, I was responding for Si, I am not Si. Can you get that through your thick skull? I have spent more time carrying weapons, in shitty parts of the world, than you ever will in your entire misbegotten life.
I suggest you follow your own bloody advice and LOOK AT WHO POSTED THE BLOODY MESSAGE YOU IDIDOT!
I'd rather be BEHIND a bleeding heart liberal with no handgun. I can use their carcass as cover, while I aim and shoot the crazy person with the gun.
Assuming you actually shoot the right target, and not an innocent bystander.
If everyone starts pulling guns how do I know which one is the crazy one?
When I said that all I could legally do but duck and hope for the best, I sorta thought that was a strong implication that I wasn't armed. I wasn't armed.WHERE DID YOU SAY YOU WERE or WEREN'T ARMED???
The implication was YOU were armed but legally couldn't respond!
So you are even DUMBER then you indicated!
SO you are NOT qualified to discuss obviously because common sense is NOT something you have because YOU DUCKED... Why did you stay at the stoplight?
Could have driven off obviously out of danger.. but no YOU DUCKED waiting like a sitting duck !
Idiot!
Moron, I was responding for Si, I am not Si. Can you get that through your thick skull? I have spent more time carrying weapons, in shitty parts of the world, than you ever will in your entire misbegotten life.
I suggest you follow your own bloody advice and LOOK AT WHO POSTED THE BLOODY MESSAGE YOU IDIDOT!
I apologize! I thought you were responding to me when you wrote :"Clearly not...can't you read?"
Sorry. To repeat though my simple easy question was who would be better to be behind a person with a gun or a person without a gun!
That's what I was trying to get across that obviously it would be better in AlMOST ALL situations NOT ALL to be with the person that can fire back!
That's my point!
