Question the CIA

[RetiredGySgt]

A Judge is ordering the Bush admin to explain what happened to tapes destroyed by the CIA. Interesting, since the CIA has actively worked to thwart this President, what exactly does this Judge think he is going to find? And shouldn't he be ordering the CIA and FBI to disclose information, not the President?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080125/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_videotapes

 

[Gunny]

A Judge is ordering the Bush admin to explain what happened to tapes destroyed by the CIA. Interesting, since the CIA has actively worked to thwart this President, what exactly does this Judge think he is going to find? And shouldn't he be ordering the CIA and FBI to disclose information, not the President?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080125/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_videotapes

Looking a little closer at the question ... just what DOES the judge think happened to tapes destroyed by the CIA?

Smells like dirty politics, as usual. The CIA destroyed the tapes without authority. But never say die, let's keep spending those tax dollars in an attempt to fabricate a trail to Bush.

 

[jillian]

Dirty politics???? The white house acknowledged it knew about the tapes. Hell, Harriet Miers was involved in advising them.

But keep on getting all huffy when people want the admin to be ACCOUNTABLE.

As for the money spent on the investigation, I guess it's only ok to waste 70 million dollars going after a president for a failed land deal, eh?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Dirty politics???? The white house acknowledged it knew about the tapes. Hell, Harriet Miers was involved in advising them.

But keep on getting all huffy when people want the admin to be ACCOUNTABLE.

As for the money spent on the investigation, I guess it's only ok to waste 70 million dollars going after a president for a failed land deal, eh?

Another blatant lie by a dem, what a concept. The CIA destroyed the Tapes with NO input from the White House, which you would know if you actually read the stories about it and not the lies the Dems put out.