teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
- Thread starter
- #21
please explain, in your own words, what Keysenian economics is... then we can read the rest of your OP.
Thank you for proving me right. I said in another thread I now what liberals will say before they say it.
This is another great tactic they play. Making you waste your time "defining" things for them, AS IF IT WERE NOT OBVIOUS.
SINCE WE HAVE BEEN LIVING KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS FOR THE LAST NEAR TWO YEARS, it's kind of obvious isn't it?
It's failing in Europe, it's failing here, but I have to waste time pretending we don't know that?
AS IF this were some classroom exercise AND NOT HARD COLD REALITY FOR EVERYONE.
It's like being in the middle of the 1930's Oklahoma dust bowl and some elitist wants me to define a dust storm instead of the moron just OBSERVING WHAT'S HAPPENING ALL AROUND HIM!
It's hilarious!
we havent been in the keynes system at all. if by two years you mean, since obama took office, than we have solely been in a free for all of spending, which is definitely not supported by the keynes theory of economics. also you can't have one president be a wild spender with tax cuts and then have the next one attempt keynes (which obama hasn't) and except anything to work. throwing keyne's system around whenver you don't like a president's economy policy is pretty stupid.
This is the CLASSIC ARGUMENT of communists.
What he is saying is because communism doesn't follow the "flowchart" or the plan that is EXACTLY ON PAPER for communism, that communism has never really been tried.
The entire premise for this argument is laughable, because it presupposes it's even POSSIBLE to follow true Marxist/communism as written on paper.
It never occurs to them, the plan changes because it ISN'T POSSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT IT as written on paper.
So, now he's saying real Keyesian economics hasn't really been done, because on paper it's different.
Liberals never change. The same arguments over and over again.