Qaddafi and sons leave libya

Republicans screamed at Obama to help the Libyan Population.

Republicans screamed at Obama for helping the Libyan Population.

The operative words, "Republicans screamed at Obama".

I'm glad you people don't have problems helping people out. Because soon Israel is going to need our help. Soon.

9 billion in aid for their military isn't enough?
 
If he has left or not is only a matter of time. But this is good for the people of Libya.

800px-Flag_of_Libya_%25281951%2529_svg.png
 
Seeing how they want obama to fail?
Outsting a.leader is never a bad thing for your resume.

But how much credit can "The Worst Affirmative Action Hire Ever"TM really take?

The Brits and French did most of the heavy lifting in this campaign.

The rebels are probably just as bad as Khadafy, maybe worse. A lot of them are the same guys who worked for Khadafy for the last 40 years. There are multiple factions of the rebellion, do you think they are all going to sit down and play nice with all this oil money lying around?

they are the people of Libya.

You dont get to pick who you think qualifies for a go at Democracy.

YOu think they are really going to have "Democracy" over there. That Qadaffy's ex-thugs and some militant Al-Qaeda Muslims are going to suddenly magically turn into Jeffersonian Democrats? Really?

Did you folks on the left used to rip on Bush for this kind of magical thinking?

Like I said earlier, I suspect the first thing that is going to happen is that they are going to slaughter those people who stayed loyal to Qadaffi, which will make the whole,"We're going to war to save lives" excuse sound a bit retarded. They won't be able to get Libya's oil back on the market in a timely manner, which will keep the price at the pump high.
 
Seeing how they want obama to fail?
Outsting a.leader is never a bad thing for your resume.

But how much credit can "The Worst Affirmative Action Hire Ever"TM really take?

The Brits and French did most of the heavy lifting in this campaign.

The rebels are probably just as bad as Khadafy, maybe worse. A lot of them are the same guys who worked for Khadafy for the last 40 years. There are multiple factions of the rebellion, do you think they are all going to sit down and play nice with all this oil money lying around?
why should i even take you seriously?

What is he wrong about? Or are you discounting the whole post because of the first sentence?
 
Its the subject of the article.

I linked to the article.

No it's not the subject of the article. Lying to avoid admitting that your lying doesn't help your case.

The subject of the article is a RUMOR. You keep ignoring this and attempt to misreprsent this rumor as fact.

That is a lie. You are a liar. Stop lying to yourself and to others or you will never truly learn anything
 
Its the subject of the article.

I linked to the article.

You made a statement, namely 'Gaddafi and sons leave Lybia'. The article is a rumor. There is nothing to substantiate your statement that they have left.

This is why you struggle with even basic arguments. You can't tell the difference between a 'fact' and a 'rumor'.
 
But how much credit can "The Worst Affirmative Action Hire Ever"TM really take?

The Brits and French did most of the heavy lifting in this campaign.

The rebels are probably just as bad as Khadafy, maybe worse. A lot of them are the same guys who worked for Khadafy for the last 40 years. There are multiple factions of the rebellion, do you think they are all going to sit down and play nice with all this oil money lying around?

they are the people of Libya.

You dont get to pick who you think qualifies for a go at Democracy.

YOu think they are really going to have "Democracy" over there. That Qadaffy's ex-thugs and some militant Al-Qaeda Muslims are going to suddenly magically turn into Jeffersonian Democrats? Really?

Did you folks on the left used to rip on Bush for this kind of magical thinking?

Like I said earlier, I suspect the first thing that is going to happen is that they are going to slaughter those people who stayed loyal to Qadaffi, which will make the whole,"We're going to war to save lives" excuse sound a bit retarded. They won't be able to get Libya's oil back on the market in a timely manner, which will keep the price at the pump high.

I believe in Democracy.

When you do it means you believe that it is the finest form of government and can transform a society to its best behavior.

What form of government would you perfer they have?

Fascism, socialism, dictatorship?
 
Its the subject of the article.

I linked to the article.

You made a statement, namely 'Gaddafi and sons leave Lybia'. The article is a rumor. There is nothing to substantiate your statement that they have left.

This is why you struggle with even basic arguments. You can't tell the difference between a 'fact' and a 'rumor'.

Grow up.
 
Seeing how they want obama to fail?
Outsting a.leader is never a bad thing for your resume.

But how much credit can "The Worst Affirmative Action Hire Ever"TM really take?

The Brits and French did most of the heavy lifting in this campaign.

The rebels are probably just as bad as Khadafy, maybe worse. A lot of them are the same guys who worked for Khadafy for the last 40 years. There are multiple factions of the rebellion, do you think they are all going to sit down and play nice with all this oil money lying around?
why should i even take you seriously?

Because he's right in this matter?

So why should any of us take you seriously? Ive yet to see you make a valid point on this board.
 
Republicans screamed at Obama to help the Libyan Population.

Republicans screamed at Obama for helping the Libyan Population.

The operative words, "Republicans screamed at Obama".

And how is that any different than "Democrats screamed at Bush"?

Hey, guy, that's in the job description. And this is my main problem with the Community Organizer. He whinges about how he's just not being loved like he thought he would. He seriously needs to find Harry's old "THe Buck Stops Here" sign and put it on his desk.

My problem with Obama was that he went at this half-heartedly. If you commit us to taking out Qadaffi, you take out Qadaffi. You terminate Colonel Qadaffi's command the way you did Colonel Kurtz's - with extreme prejudice. YOu don't "Lead from behind" and prolong the agony for six months, which is pretty much what happened here.
 
Its the subject of the article.

I linked to the article.

You made a statement, namely 'Gaddafi and sons leave Lybia'. The article is a rumor. There is nothing to substantiate your statement that they have left.

This is why you struggle with even basic arguments. You can't tell the difference between a 'fact' and a 'rumor'.

Grow up.

Who really needs to grow up? The person who lies and refuses to admit it or the person speaking the truth?
 
they are the people of Libya.

You dont get to pick who you think qualifies for a go at Democracy.

YOu think they are really going to have "Democracy" over there. That Qadaffy's ex-thugs and some militant Al-Qaeda Muslims are going to suddenly magically turn into Jeffersonian Democrats? Really?

Did you folks on the left used to rip on Bush for this kind of magical thinking?

Like I said earlier, I suspect the first thing that is going to happen is that they are going to slaughter those people who stayed loyal to Qadaffi, which will make the whole,"We're going to war to save lives" excuse sound a bit retarded. They won't be able to get Libya's oil back on the market in a timely manner, which will keep the price at the pump high.

I believe in Democracy.

When you do it means you believe that it is the finest form of government and can transform a society to its best behavior.

What form of government would you perfer they have?

Fascism, socialism, dictatorship?

We prefer Republics, which have a far better success rate than mobocracies.
 
Its the subject of the article.

I linked to the article.

You made a statement, namely 'Gaddafi and sons leave Lybia'. The article is a rumor. There is nothing to substantiate your statement that they have left.

This is why you struggle with even basic arguments. You can't tell the difference between a 'fact' and a 'rumor'.

Grow up.

The emotional response to a logical comment. You dislike anyone who holds your own dishonesty up in front of you.
 
why should i even take you seriously?

Because he's right in this matter?

So why should any of us take you seriously? Ive yet to see you make a valid point on this board.

you dont, thats the wonderful thing about choice, and your opinion of me really hurt....:lol::lol:

I haven't stated an opinion about you. I asked you a question of why we should take you seriously when you havent made a valid point.

You really arent in a position to challenge the credibility of someone else who is offering substantive discussion
 
they are the people of Libya.

You dont get to pick who you think qualifies for a go at Democracy.

YOu think they are really going to have "Democracy" over there. That Qadaffy's ex-thugs and some militant Al-Qaeda Muslims are going to suddenly magically turn into Jeffersonian Democrats? Really?

Did you folks on the left used to rip on Bush for this kind of magical thinking?

Like I said earlier, I suspect the first thing that is going to happen is that they are going to slaughter those people who stayed loyal to Qadaffi, which will make the whole,"We're going to war to save lives" excuse sound a bit retarded. They won't be able to get Libya's oil back on the market in a timely manner, which will keep the price at the pump high.

I believe in Democracy.

When you do it means you believe that it is the finest form of government and can transform a society to its best behavior.

What form of government would you perfer they have?

Fascism, socialism, dictatorship?

But you live in a Republic.
 
You made a statement, namely 'Gaddafi and sons leave Lybia'. The article is a rumor. There is nothing to substantiate your statement that they have left.

This is why you struggle with even basic arguments. You can't tell the difference between a 'fact' and a 'rumor'.

Grow up.

The emotional response to a logical comment. You dislike anyone who holds your own dishonesty up in front of you.

It must simply be too painful for her to admit that she is lying about something for whatever reason. It damages her ego. She needs to learn that it's alright to let go of the pride and the "perfect" self image we sometimes we have of ourselves. Learning humility and looking at ourselves as we truly are help us grow.

I dont know it makes you feel unsecure TM. But letting go of the pride voluntarily is much easier than letting life destroy you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top