Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
The Federal FMLA prevents this.
But in a "at will" state, do you have to give a reason for firing someone?
If they are on FMLA you do.
That's not the same as sick leave though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Federal FMLA prevents this.
But in a "at will" state, do you have to give a reason for firing someone?
If they are on FMLA you do.
But in a "at will" state, do you have to give a reason for firing someone?
If they are on FMLA you do.
That's not the same as sick leave though.
While the OP may have been inarticulate in making his point, his point is one that needs to be addressed. More than 40 million workers get no paid sick leave. That means 40 million people going to work sick and spreading their sick to others. (65% of the working poor in NY according to a recent study)
What is needed is a national law that would require paid sick time, but with the current climate in DC that's not likely to happen anytime soon so states like NY and cities like SF are trying to pass laws or have passed laws at the local level.
More people in this country are paid not to work than are those who go without sick pay.
Twit Lib puke tard.
really, h? you think someone should have to go to work with the flu or either not get paid or be in jeopardy of losing their job?
i don't think you really want to say that. do you?
I see a lot of deflection, but no actual addressing of the issue. Should people get paid sick time off, yes or no?
As an employer why should I pay you for NOT coming to work? I pay you to perform a service for me, if you are not performing that service, it's not pay I'd be giving you, it's charity, and I'm in the Home Improvement business, not the charity business.
really, h? you think someone should have to go to work with the flu or either not get paid or be in jeopardy of losing their job?
i don't think you really want to say that. do you?
The Federal FMLA prevents this.
More people in this country are paid not to work than are those who go without sick pay.
Twit Lib puke tard.
Too bad, you're gonna lose the right to own, possess, or have in your custody and control a firearm.
Too bad, you're gonna lose the right to own, possess, or have in your custody and control a firearm.
Right being determined a "criminal" by someone who wishes to destroy me because of my Constituional rigidity is a terrible fate.
Your law is going to stop me from defending myself and family.
Got it.
really, h? you think someone should have to go to work with the flu or either not get paid or be in jeopardy of losing their job?
i don't think you really want to say that. do you?
The Federal FMLA prevents this.
The key portion of the FMLA says UNPAID sick leave further more it does not cover things like the flu or colds, etc.
Non-eligible workers and types of leaveThe federal FMLA does not apply to:
workers who need time off to recover from short-term or common illness like a cold, or to care for a family member with a short-term illness;
Can an employee stay home under Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave to avoid getting pandemic influenza?
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) protects eligible employees who are incapacitated by a serious health condition, as may be the case with the flu where complications arise, or who are needed to care for covered family members who are incapacitated by a serious health condition. Leave taken by an employee for the purpose of avoiding exposure to the flu would not be protected under the FMLA. Employers should encourage employees that are ill with pandemic influenza or are exposed to ill family members to stay home and should consider flexible leave policies for their employees in these circumstances.
And stoopid!! How many got the flu out of this, Fascist twit/Pub dupes! TYVM.
As an employer why should I pay you for NOT coming to work? I pay you to perform a service for me, if you are not performing that service, it's not pay I'd be giving you, it's charity, and I'm in the Home Improvement business, not the charity business.
I see, so you're also in the flu transmission business. I'd bet you never pull permits, which makes you, if I'm correct, a criminal. Too bad, you're gonna lose the right to own, possess, or have in your custody and control a firearm.
The Federal FMLA prevents this.
The key portion of the FMLA says UNPAID sick leave further more it does not cover things like the flu or colds, etc.
Non-eligible workers and types of leaveThe federal FMLA does not apply to:
workers who need time off to recover from short-term or common illness like a cold, or to care for a family member with a short-term illness;
Thanks. You're wrong.
Can an employee stay home under Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave to avoid getting pandemic influenza?
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) protects eligible employees who are incapacitated by a serious health condition, as may be the case with the flu where complications arise, or who are needed to care for covered family members who are incapacitated by a serious health condition. Leave taken by an employee for the purpose of avoiding exposure to the flu would not be protected under the FMLA. Employers should encourage employees that are ill with pandemic influenza or are exposed to ill family members to stay home and should consider flexible leave policies for their employees in these circumstances.
Miss that part dumbass? Not for the flu, but if you have the flu, AND COMPLICATIONS ARISE. So no, I'm not wrong.
http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oG...ttp://www.dol.gov/whd/healthcare/flu_FMLA.pdf
While the OP may have been inarticulate in making his point, his point is one that needs to be addressed. More than 40 million workers get no paid sick leave. That means 40 million people going to work sick and spreading their sick to others. (65% of the working poor in NY according to a recent study)
What is needed is a national law that would require paid sick time, but with the current climate in DC that's not likely to happen anytime soon so states like NY and cities like SF are trying to pass laws or have passed laws at the local level.
Bullcrap. As an employer I refuse to pay someone for NOT working. What is it with you freaking scumbag liberal always wanting something for nothing. Let me help you understand the concept behind "work". You agree to perfrom a service for someone and in exchange they agree to give you money for that service. No service performed, no money deserved. Why do so many liberal a-holes think it's a good thing for people to give their hard earned money to others for doing nothing?
Miss that red part dumbass? Not for the flu, but if you have the flu, AND COMPLICATIONS ARISE. So no, I'm not wrong.
What is needed is a national law that would require paid sick time, but with the current climate in DC that's not likely to happen anytime soon so states like NY and cities like SF are trying to pass laws or have passed laws at the local level.
While the OP may have been inarticulate in making his point, his point is one that needs to be addressed. More than 40 million workers get no paid sick leave. That means 40 million people going to work sick and spreading their sick to others. (65% of the working poor in NY according to a recent study)
What is needed is a national law that would require paid sick time, but with the current climate in DC that's not likely to happen anytime soon so states like NY and cities like SF are trying to pass laws or have passed laws at the local level.