Protestors Put on Terror Watch List

[rightwinger]

Socialists/Communists always turn on their own people eventually. This is just fact. Look at our own President attacking and suing his own people in Arizona. It's all part of the Saul Alinsky 'Rules for Radicals' game-plan. More people should read 'Rules for Radicals" to better understand what the Socialists/Progressives are doing to our country. Most Americans just want their President to stand up for them. They don't want their President standing up for the Mexican Government and Illegals. Our President and his Party no longer represent American Citizens' best interests. That's pretty clear at this point. Putting Protesters on "Terror Watch Lists" makes perfect sense when you realize who's running our country. It is very sad but you do still have a voice. Make your voice heard on Election Day. Give the Socialists/Progressives the boot.

Libo post..


Grumble, grumble, grumble...Socialist/Communist....Grumble, grumble....Alinsky.....Grumble, grumble, grumble..Anti-American...grumble....more socialists

 

[Charles_Main]

Raise your hand if you supported the Patriot Act and are now surprised its being used in ways you don't like.

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

We warned you and warned you that passing such a thing was a bad idea. Too bad it has to be turned on the the public before folks realize the idiocy of giving up that much power to the Feds.

You complain about the Feds having too much power, but you support Obama's Presidency?

What are you smoking?

It's possible to believe that republican/conservatives would embrace MORE power than liberals/democrats/obama

I'm not arguing that obama/libs/dems are NOT guilty of wanting too much federal power

I'm suggesting that they are the lesser of two evils.....

if we have to choose between inept liberal/democrats wielding too much federal power
or angry mean spirited self righteous religiously zealous conservative republicans wielding too much federal power then I'll choose inept democrats every time

Then you are incredibly naive. Obama and the congressional Dems have Drastically increased the power of the Fed over all of our lives in nearly every direction.

 

[jillian]

Should Muslim protesters get put on Govt watch lists?

If a Muslim is holding up an anti-US sign....should we keep an eye on him?

Not on a terror list but YES we should watch him if he is in the US. It is called reasonable suspicion.

and that seems to be all that happened here... it's just the lists seems to have gotten crossed... which is why rendell said it was 'embarrassing'.

i knew someone who's student draft deferrment was pulled b/c of his activism in college. you think this is anything new? your ox is just gored b/c it was a rightwingnut who's being watched instead of a lefty.

 

[chanel]

It wasn't just "rightwingnuts" on that list Jillian.

The state paid a Philadelphia-based nonprofit $125,000 to compile the list as part of the state Homeland Security's federally mandated mission to protect public infrastructure.

The list included a Washington County meeting that Rendell attended to discuss Marcellus shale gas drilling, a screening of a documentary on the industry, a rally supporting Rendell's education budget and anti-tax protesters who took an inflatable pig to Harrisburg.

Homeland Security officials distributed the list in a security bulletin to government and law enforcement officials — including Pittsburgh City Council members — as well as universities and gas drilling companies.

WTF is Homeland Security doing hiring a "non profit" to compile terror lists? There aren't enough fucking bureaucrats being paid to do that? "Big Brother" is supposed to be the government. That is bad enough. Now there are other private agencies snooping into people's affairs?

It's outrageous if you ask me.

 

[daveman]

Here's the thing:

I don't. Espeically when he does stuff like this. I took Bush to task over the expanding investigatory power of the Feds. I really do not like Obama continuing it.

If the GOP runs a reasonable alternative in 2012, I won't be voting for him.

I repeat: What are you smoking?

Bush expanded the power of the Feds to investigate you. Obama is continuing that expansion. Do I need to draw a diagram?

Disagreed when Bush started, don't like it any better as Obama continues it.

Ooops! My apologies. I misread what you wrote. Sorry!

 

[daveman]

Raise your hand if you supported the Patriot Act and are now surprised its being used in ways you don't like.

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

We warned you and warned you that passing such a thing was a bad idea. Too bad it has to be turned on the the public before folks realize the idiocy of giving up that much power to the Feds.

You complain about the Feds having too much power, but you support Obama's Presidency?

What are you smoking?

It's possible to believe that republican/conservatives would embrace MORE power than liberals/democrats/obama

I'm not arguing that obama/libs/dems are NOT guilty of wanting too much federal power

I'm suggesting that they are the lesser of two evils.....

if we have to choose between inept liberal/democrats wielding too much federal power
or angry mean spirited self righteous religiously zealous conservative republicans wielding too much federal power then I'll choose inept democrats every time

Shouldn't we demand better of those who represent us? They've forgotten that their job is representation. They think they're leaders. But that's not the job description.

If your Congressmen don't think they represent you, fire them.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Protest cannot be tolerated in a Socialist/Communist State. Wake up America. Get out and vote. Make 2010 count!

 

[Dr.Traveler]

I repeat: What are you smoking?

Bush expanded the power of the Feds to investigate you. Obama is continuing that expansion. Do I need to draw a diagram?

Disagreed when Bush started, don't like it any better as Obama continues it.

Ooops! My apologies. I misread what you wrote. Sorry!

Heh. I think we're finding that you and I are not so different on our stances as might first appear.

 

[∑₭o Đ∆Żə]

It seems like every time we hear of a "Fort Hood" or a "Times Square" bombing attempt now, we get the standard response that "Officials didn't make the connections in time" –when there were glaring warning signs. What exactly are these people at HLS supposed to be doing, and who are they supposed to be looking at?

I see many more examples now of regular, politically-active Americans being profiled and watched – myself included – than the people who really pose a violent threat to the citizens and institutions of this country. This, coupled with the constant accusations from screaming liberals that conservatives and Constitutional Americans are "racists and terrorists", leads me to believe that this kind of extremism is exactly what the global/socialist powers are looking for, and what they are hoping to find. What I really fear though, is that if it turns out they're not successful in provoking "right-wing extremists" into committing acts of terrorism, that they'll have to resort to manufacturing spectacles like this themselves.

So much is at stake right now for the NWO powers. If they can't create the conditions for civil meltdown and chaos, they're chances of making a complete overhaul to our form of government (into one that's compatible with global socialism) will be much more difficult – maybe even impossible without a fascistic form of tyranny. Control like that is both costly and tenuous... and usually short-lived.

 

[daveman]

Bush expanded the power of the Feds to investigate you. Obama is continuing that expansion. Do I need to draw a diagram?

Disagreed when Bush started, don't like it any better as Obama continues it.

Ooops! My apologies. I misread what you wrote. Sorry!

Heh. I think we're finding that you and I are not so different on our stances as might first appear.

Indeed.