Protect the Citizen's income allowance.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by bartin, Apr 10, 2012.

  1. bartin

    bartin Rookie

    Dec 7, 2010
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    The automobile insurance agencies of California, should only be allowed to access or induce prospective customers by, affording “public option” as opposed to endorsing “mandated customers”

    Auto insurance is a good thing to have; but never at the expense of sabotaging the voting system to overthrow or forbid “public option” only to replace it with the corruption of piracy to “pilfer” or force a mandated siphon to pledge or control the citizen's income allowance to require a mandated profit.

    The current opportunities to acquire automobile insurance in the state of California instigates the pledge of allegiance to “quota” or mandation as opposed to the pledge of allegiance to “consent” or “freedom to choice”

    The “power of purchase” is qualified by ability of a monetary system to provoke “free trade” by recruiting the occupation of “consent” and never the occupation of “quota”.

    Free trade is decided by the criteria “supply” and never “demand”.

    Supply is the labor of consent; but demand is the labor of quota.

    The power of purchase is the liability of consent and never quota, in order to promote the logic of ownership to its authority of accountability.

    Public option resolves to the accountability of liability.

    Mandation resolves to the corruption of piracy.

    A monetary system is sustained by validating the “power of purchase” to government treasury ; as opposed to serving the ransom of mandated profits installed by commercial industry.

    The auto insurance agencies of California have a installed system to gain controlling asset of the citizens income allowance to collect a revenue of “mandated profits”.

    The auto insurance agencies of California have corrupted the voting system to require “mandatory customers,” in order to mandate a profit.

    This type of conduct to “ mandate a customer” is sabotage to the “power of purchase” by “mandating a customer” in order to voucher the surplus of demand for evading bankruptcy and contrive a method to sub-lease their ability to pay government taxes.

    To mandate a costumer trespasses on the government treasury”s ability to protect the citizen”s rights of the “power of purchase” and also reserve the citizens right to “income allowance security”.

    Mandated profits, and “mandated customers” violates the logic of “minimum wage” because it infiltrates the citizen’s income allowance as a utensil to siphon a “forced profit” in order to pilfer “he power of purchase”.

    Mandated profits keeps the citizens income allowance hostage to “pay the ransom” of commercial

    Industry at the expense of “bribing” the citizen’s “power of purchase” .

    The purpose of minimum wage is to protect the citizen’s “power of purchase”.

    The mission statement of minimum wage cannot afford mandated profits or mandated customers.

    The automobile insurance agencies of California are in violation of U.S. Treasury law.

    A monetary system is governed by Treasury assets and never “mandated profits”

    Commercial industry is subordinated by the Treasury in order to validate “free trade” to its nationality of monetary system.

    A mandated customer is an implication “piracy” and not consent.
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2012

Share This Page