Prop 8 defender of sanctity of marriage is divorcing his wife

What it means is this.

Marriage, after all, isn't a sacrament, it's a legal arrangement.

Or it means that Mr Manchester no longer has his Catholic faith.

But could mean that Mr Manchester still has his Catholic faith, just not all of it, he's ditched the bit about marriage being a sacrament.

Mr Manchester could also be a hypocrite.

Your choice.

So you and your ilk defend a State not allowing Divorce, better hurry and tell your gay buddies since especially the male ones fuck anything that moves and can not keep relationships for more than a few years max if that long.

Divorce has fuck all to do with Marriage being between a man and a woman. That you sick turds think it does explains a few things about your ignorance.

None of that made any sense at all - want to try again? :lol:

It sure as hell does. YOU claim that getting a divorce somehow has something to do with marriage being between a man and woman and that a person that supports the point of view that it is between man and woman is some how hypocritical cause he got a divorce from his WIFE. The two are SEPARATE ISSUES.

So do you now support no divorce? Or are YOU being a hypocrite on this issue? Being a partisan hack with an agenda?
 
So you and your ilk defend a State not allowing Divorce, better hurry and tell your gay buddies since especially the male ones fuck anything that moves and can not keep relationships for more than a few years max if that long.

Divorce has fuck all to do with Marriage being between a man and a woman. That you sick turds think it does explains a few things about your ignorance.

None of that made any sense at all - want to try again? :lol:

It sure as hell does. YOU claim that getting a divorce somehow has something to do with marriage being between a man and woman and that a person that supports the point of view that it is between man and woman is some how hypocritical cause he got a divorce from his WIFE. The two are SEPARATE ISSUES.

So do you now support no divorce? Or are YOU being a hypocrite on this issue? Being a partisan hack with an agenda?

I'm embarrassed, I haven't a clue what you're on about.
 
My wife is Filipino. The divorce rate amongst US Military personnel and Filipino spouses when we married was almost 80 percent for the first 5 years and after that those that made it past 5 years had something like a 70 percent divorce rate up to the 10 year mark. Go ahead tell us all about your marriage and what qualifies YOU to question anyone else and their relationships?
 
San Diego CityBeat - Ironic divorce

Ironic divorce
Protector of traditional marriage Doug Manchester leaving wife of 43 years
By Eric Wolff


In July 2008, hotelier and developer Doug Manchester donated $125,000 to help gather signatures for a proposition that would ban same-sex marriage in California. The early money was crucial to getting the initiative—which ultimately passed—on the ballot. At the time, he told The New York Times that he made the donation because of “my Catholic faith and longtime affiliation with the Catholic Church,” which preferred that marriage remain between a man and a woman. Indeed, the Catholic Church has vehemently opposed gay marriage. Then again, it’s also not too keen on divorce.

On Oct. 9, 2008, Manchester ended 43 years, eight months and nine days of marriage to Elizabeth Manchester by moving out of their La Jolla abode. The couple spent the next several months trying to reach a quiet settlement on how best to distribute millions of dollars in cash and other assets. In July, those talks totally broke down, and Doug started playing financial hardball with Elizabeth, allegedly draining the couple’s shared accounts and stealing her mail. On Aug. 6, Elizabeth filed a petition for redress in family court. All of the information in this story comes from those petitions. CityBeat contacted attorneys for both parties, but neither returned calls by press time. <more>

so does that mean hes going to start sucking cock?

Please, can you give your homo-erotic obsession a rest?

careful he might take a run at your man
 
What it means is this.

Marriage, after all, isn't a sacrament, it's a legal arrangement.

Or it means that Mr Manchester no longer has his Catholic faith.

But could mean that Mr Manchester still has his Catholic faith, just not all of it, he's ditched the bit about marriage being a sacrament.

Mr Manchester could also be a hypocrite.

Your choice.

So you and your ilk defend a State not allowing Divorce, better hurry and tell your gay buddies since especially the male ones fuck anything that moves and can not keep relationships for more than a few years max if that long.

Divorce has fuck all to do with Marriage being between a man and a woman. That you sick turds think it does explains a few things about your ignorance.

Really? Then why not allow gay marriage and then make divorce illegal and prove it? Until that happens, your opinions are just that.
 
What it means is this.

Marriage, after all, isn't a sacrament, it's a legal arrangement.

Or it means that Mr Manchester no longer has his Catholic faith.

But could mean that Mr Manchester still has his Catholic faith, just not all of it, he's ditched the bit about marriage being a sacrament.

Mr Manchester could also be a hypocrite.

Your choice.

So you and your ilk defend a State not allowing Divorce, better hurry and tell your gay buddies since especially the male ones fuck anything that moves and can not keep relationships for more than a few years max if that long.

Divorce has fuck all to do with Marriage being between a man and a woman. That you sick turds think it does explains a few things about your ignorance.

Really? Then why not allow gay marriage and then make divorce illegal and prove it? Until that happens, your opinions are just that.

marraige is a matter of religion. civil unions are the government alternative. the gov has no buisness meddling in church sacraments. now buzz off ya fanatic!
 
So you and your ilk defend a State not allowing Divorce, better hurry and tell your gay buddies since especially the male ones fuck anything that moves and can not keep relationships for more than a few years max if that long.

Divorce has fuck all to do with Marriage being between a man and a woman. That you sick turds think it does explains a few things about your ignorance.

None of that made any sense at all - want to try again? :lol:

It sure as hell does. YOU claim that getting a divorce somehow has something to do with marriage being between a man and woman and that a person that supports the point of view that it is between man and woman is some how hypocritical cause he got a divorce from his WIFE. The two are SEPARATE ISSUES.

So do you now support no divorce? Or are YOU being a hypocrite on this issue? Being a partisan hack with an agenda?


Sometimes, I'm tempted to call Poe's Law on this retard...
 
So you and your ilk defend a State not allowing Divorce, better hurry and tell your gay buddies since especially the male ones fuck anything that moves and can not keep relationships for more than a few years max if that long.

Divorce has fuck all to do with Marriage being between a man and a woman. That you sick turds think it does explains a few things about your ignorance.

Really? Then why not allow gay marriage and then make divorce illegal and prove it? Until that happens, your opinions are just that.

marraige is a matter of religion. civil unions are the government alternative. the gov has no buisness meddling in church sacraments. now buzz off ya fanatic!

Okay if it's a matter of religion how come people can marry in a registry office?

You're trapped in either/or. The fact is marriage can be performed in a religious ceremony or in a non-religious ceremony.

As for governments and meddling - they administer the laws of marriage :lol:
 
Really? Then why not allow gay marriage and then make divorce illegal and prove it? Until that happens, your opinions are just that.

marraige is a matter of religion. civil unions are the government alternative. the gov has no buisness meddling in church sacraments. now buzz off ya fanatic!

Okay if it's a matter of religion how come people can marry in a registry office?

You're trapped in either/or. The fact is marriage can be performed in a religious ceremony or in a non-religious ceremony.

As for governments and meddling - they administer the laws of marriage :lol:

none of that chages the fact that marriage is a religious sacrment.

gov administering the laws of marriage? you mean gov meddling with religious sacraments
 
marraige is a matter of religion. civil unions are the government alternative. the gov has no buisness meddling in church sacraments. now buzz off ya fanatic!

Okay if it's a matter of religion how come people can marry in a registry office?

You're trapped in either/or. The fact is marriage can be performed in a religious ceremony or in a non-religious ceremony.

As for governments and meddling - they administer the laws of marriage :lol:

none of that chages the fact that marriage is a religious sacrment.

gov administering the laws of marriage? you mean gov meddling with religious sacraments

Marriage can be a religious sacrament, yes. Depending on the jurisdiction you'll probably find that the law allows marriage to be celebrated as a religious sacrament, it doesn't require it to be celebrated as a religious sacrament.

But if marriage was only a religious sacrament then it would have no legal basis, a bit like Holy Communion.
 
Okay if it's a matter of religion how come people can marry in a registry office?

You're trapped in either/or. The fact is marriage can be performed in a religious ceremony or in a non-religious ceremony.

As for governments and meddling - they administer the laws of marriage :lol:

none of that chages the fact that marriage is a religious sacrment.

gov administering the laws of marriage? you mean gov meddling with religious sacraments

Marriage can be a religious sacrament, yes. Depending on the jurisdiction you'll probably find that the law allows marriage to be celebrated as a religious sacrament, it doesn't require it to be celebrated as a religious sacrament.

But if marriage was only a religious sacrament then it would have no legal basis, a bit like Holy Communion.

religious sacrments do not need the ok of the law. laws can be changed and manipulated to fit political agendas, the history of the religious rite of marraige is thousands of years old.
 

Forum List

Back
Top