Proof that FOX News takes its viewers for morons

[California Girl]

Mark Foley Republican accused of sexually abusing boys.

Why don't you fixate on Anthony Weiner or Barney Frank

This thread is about Fox News credibility.

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

 

[Si modo]

My gast is completely flabbered!


No, really. It is!

I would have thought that your gob is smacked. Mine is.

 

[Truthseeker420]

Why don't you fixate on Anthony Weiner or Barney Frank

This thread is about Fox News credibility.

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

 

[Warrior102]

This thread is about Fox News credibility.

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

Don't you have Ramadan to celebrate or an American Flag to burn, asswipe?

 

[Si modo]

This thread is about Fox News credibility.

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

A conspiracy!

 

[blastoff]

Horrid, just horrid.

Except I can read and I know that 8.6 is less than 9.0.

I can read also and 8.6 is certainly less than 9.0. You and I get gold stars Zander.

TDM gets a raspberry because she's an idiot.

To be completely fair and balanced, she's more than proven worthy of an entire raspberry patch.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

And your point is what exactly? Did the unemployment rate not go down to a still very high 8.6%? Now i have to look at october I forget what the numbers were for that month....

 

[Full-Auto]

That is damning, simply damning.

The last data point should be the LOWEST point on the graph - YOU THINK THAT'S AN HONEST MISTAKE you really are a sucker.

LOL ARE YOU REALLY THAT INCREDIBLY STUPID?

I guess the 8.6% is invisible. Damn what a maroon.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

That is damning, simply damning.

The last data point should be the LOWEST point on the graph - YOU THINK THAT'S AN HONEST MISTAKE you really are a sucker.

LOL ARE YOU REALLY THAT INCREDIBLY STUPID?

I guess the 8.6% is invisible. Damn what a maroon.

oh NOW I get his issue.

I just looked at the actual numbers I didn't even look at the "height" on the chart.....so dumb of me to rely on numbers instead of graphics (sarcasm)

 

[Truthseeker420]

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

A conspiracy!

More like a Neoconservative organization with an agenda.

 

[Dot Com]

What a strange Obsession for some people. Fox news

It could be a new psychiatric disorder.

Ummm..... prolly because its the only channel, aside from CNBC, that caters to you little people.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

What a strange Obsession for some people. Fox news

It could be a new psychiatric disorder.

Ummm..... prolly because its the only channel, aside from CNBC, that caters to you little people.

Nah its their inability to grasp why fox news is so popular amongst even democrats now.

 

[California Girl]

This thread is about Fox News credibility.

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

And your evidence for that would be?

 

[Article 15]

This kind of stuff has been a commonplace at FOX for a while now.

But they only take some of their viewers as morons who are fooled by this. They rely on their hyper-partisan but literate viewers to defend them when they get called out on it.

 

[Article 15]

Really? I thought it was about a mistake on a chart which, apparently, is 'proof' of something I don't give a shit about.

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

And your evidence for that would be?

 

[JStone]

What a strange Obsession for some people. Fox news

It could be a new psychiatric disorder.

Ummm..... prolly because its the only channel, aside from CNBC, that caters to you little people.

You're a TV connoisseur? Explains your low IQ.

 

[California Girl]

What a strange Obsession for some people. Fox news

It could be a new psychiatric disorder.

Ummm..... prolly because its the only channel, aside from CNBC, that caters to you little people.

Whereas you very smart people get your facts from MSNBC.

 

[uscitizen]

Was it a deliberate distortion or just another example of Fox's inept news reporting?

Either way it is not flattering at all to Fox.

 

[Si modo]

This kind of stuff has been a commonplace at FOX for a while now.

But they only take some of their viewers as morons who are fooled by this. They rely on their hyper-partisan but literate viewers to defend them when they get called out on it.

I'm still looking for those posts that said FNN didn't make a mistake.

 

[Full-Auto]

It wasn't a mistake, it was a typical Fox News distortion of facts.

And your evidence for that would be?

Pathetic. But its so you.