Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
that pretty much sums it up. If they can't field a winning candidate, then they tie the legislative process into knots. Basically a temper tantrum."Projected Voter turnout 2016---Bad News for GOP"
Bad news republican brought on themselves, the consequence of their hostility toward gay Americans, women, minorities, Hispanic immigrants, and pursuing a partisan agenda placing Party before country.
It's interesting how you people started to care about the decling middle class when Obama became president. You pretended it wasn't even an issue while Bush was president.I am all for this demographic shift if it means a republican stays out of the White House.
Yes, the Dems have been so great for the middle classSeriously dude, you need to pull the blinders off.
Obama is responsible for the biggest middle class cut since Reagan. He also intends to widen the eligibility of over time pay for workers which will put many of them in the middle class. Republicans refuse to do jackshit for the middle class.
I have ALWAYS cared about the middle class. If the Dems did they would enact legislation that helps them. Instead Reid and company have been fucking over the middle class for decades and morons like you support them because they're "Democrats". Here's the deal, idiot.....they are Democrats in name only. What they truly are is elitist progressives who use the middle class to enrich themselves and gather power to themselves.
And you're too fucking stupid to realize it.
Regardless of who will win the primaries later this year, the demographics entailed in the population growth of our country will constitute the main factor in determining who will sit in the oval office....
It is a stark reality that the US white, evangelical and republican-leaning population is dwindling, while the Hispanic/Latino and Asian segment is fast and steadily growing.
These latter segments have been ill-courted by the GOP and tend to heavily favor democrats' policies........The US House will likely remain in republican hands, but the Senate might experience a shift toward democrats (if not a majority) and the WH with guarded surety will remain "blue."
_____________________________________
Republicans have two major problems when it comes to winning presidential elections: demograpics and the Electoral College. And as the 2016 election gets off the ground, both of these problems are getting worse.
On the Electoral College front, Democrats quite simply have more electoral votes "in the bank" (i.e. safe blue states) and need to win fewer swing states than Republicans do. And demographically, the Democrats' gains among Hispanic voters in particular pose a real long-term problem for Republicans, given this population is growing extremely fast and the white population is, well, not.
The GOP s major 2016 problem in 3 maps - The Washington Post
Its too bad that rdean is on My ignore list as I'd like to see his head explode but that is just the way it goes.
I want you to consider something very carefully.
When Jindal, Fiorina, and Carson announce their candidacy, the GOP will have an African-American, a women, an American Inidan, a Cuban, and two white guys.
Now contrast that to the Democrat party which has ONE UBER RICH WHITE WOMAN who is a corporatist.
So, you go ahead with your idyll speculation on racial blocks and how they vote, ignore that second coat of shellack that was administered last year, and stick with the Dems have the white house locked up, meme. Everyone needs a fantasy.
Name the last three-term party in the executive branchIsn't that what was said in 10 & again in 14?
Yea...hang on to that
It may be too much for your half-brain to handle, but 2016 is a PRESIDENTIAL election cycle...not a midterm one.....Take off your shoes, get your toes to help you count off the 4 years' presidential election cycles.
Doesn't change the point of my post after eight years Americans grow weary of the same party. Bush after Reagan was the only time that we went three election cycles with the same partyName the last three-term party in the executive branchIsn't that what was said in 10 & again in 14?
Yea...hang on to that
It may be too much for your half-brain to handle, but 2016 is a PRESIDENTIAL election cycle...not a midterm one.....Take off your shoes, get your toes to help you count off the 4 years' presidential election cycles.
Name one presidential election since 1928 where repubs won without a bush or Nixon on the ticket.
LOL!"Projected Voter turnout 2016---Bad News for GOP"
Bad news republican brought on themselves, the consequence of their hostility toward gay Americans, women, minorities, Hispanic immigrants, and pursuing a partisan agenda placing Party before country.
According to the liberal media who finished the recount, no one, because W won. We were screwed either way, W and Gore were both terrible candidates to be President1) Republicans can gerrymander now because they are the dominant party at the State level, so how do you figure you are the party of the people? LOL
That's cute......Who needed the Supreme Court to put the GWB failure in the WH?
Ask a grown up to help you read the O/P article and explain to you about the electoral votes......2016 is NOT a mid-term election and also check out how well republican-majority congress is doing in the ratings.
They are just as diverse on the GOP side. I know that does not fit the wingnut narrative, but there it is.Try and make sense, will ya......Only one will get the nod....the point was that the left like to call the right the party of old white people......When Jindal, Fiorina, and Carson announce their candidacy, the GOP will have an African-American, a women, an American Inidan, a Cuban, and two white guys.
Now contrast that to the Democrat party which has ONE UBER RICH WHITE WOMAN who is a corporatist.
What are you hoping for, President by committee?
Does it really take ALL those candidates to beat up on Hillary? Bullies.
Yet the only diversity I see in the upcoming election is from the right.....while the left has one broom-riding, ultra rich, corporatist, whitey.....
Maybe true of the candidates, but the voters who support each are very diverse and becoming more so each day. Think.....for a moment.
LOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
Each one is a viable candidate, sane, and more experienced than the current occupant. I might add, they're smarter than Clinton too.Regardless of who will win the primaries later this year, the demographics entailed in the population growth of our country will constitute the main factor in determining who will sit in the oval office....
It is a stark reality that the US white, evangelical and republican-leaning population is dwindling, while the Hispanic/Latino and Asian segment is fast and steadily growing.
These latter segments have been ill-courted by the GOP and tend to heavily favor democrats' policies........The US House will likely remain in republican hands, but the Senate might experience a shift toward democrats (if not a majority) and the WH with guarded surety will remain "blue."
_____________________________________
Republicans have two major problems when it comes to winning presidential elections: demograpics and the Electoral College. And as the 2016 election gets off the ground, both of these problems are getting worse.
On the Electoral College front, Democrats quite simply have more electoral votes "in the bank" (i.e. safe blue states) and need to win fewer swing states than Republicans do. And demographically, the Democrats' gains among Hispanic voters in particular pose a real long-term problem for Republicans, given this population is growing extremely fast and the white population is, well, not.
The GOP s major 2016 problem in 3 maps - The Washington Post
Its too bad that rdean is on My ignore list as I'd like to see his head explode but that is just the way it goes.
I want you to consider something very carefully.
When Jindal, Fiorina, and Carson announce their candidacy, the GOP will have an African-American, a women, an American Inidan, a Cuban, and two white guys.
Now contrast that to the Democrat party which has ONE UBER RICH WHITE WOMAN who is a corporatist.
So, you go ahead with your idyll speculation on racial blocks and how they vote, ignore that second coat of shellack that was administered last year, and stick with the Dems have the white house locked up, meme. Everyone needs a fantasy.
Sure, but the repubs you listed are nut jobs. Not a viable candidate in the bunch.
LOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
Each one is a viable candidate, sane, and more experienced than the current occupant. I might add, they're smarter than Clinton too.
This Republican Party came into existence in the middle 60's when conservatives fled the Democratic Party because so many blacks had joined. Somehow these idiot right wingers want to believe Lincoln was a confederate. But clearly, he wasn't.Name the last three-term party in the executive branchIsn't that what was said in 10 & again in 14?
Yea...hang on to that
It may be too much for your half-brain to handle, but 2016 is a PRESIDENTIAL election cycle...not a midterm one.....Take off your shoes, get your toes to help you count off the 4 years' presidential election cycles.
Name one presidential election since 1928 where repubs won without a bush or Nixon on the ticket.
They always do.LOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
This nitwit pulls "facts" out of his behind:
The Hispanic Vote in Presidential Elections, 1980-2012
Pew Research Center ^ | 11/7/2012
Posted on 11/12/2012 8:58:29 AM by ReaganÜberAlles
--1980 Jimmy Carter, 56% Ronald Reagan, 35% +21
--1984 Walter Mondale, 61% Ronald Reagan, 37% +24
--1988 Michael Dukakis, 69% George H.W. Bush, 30% +39
--1992 Bill Clinton, 61% George H.W. Bush, 25% +36
--1996 Bill Clinton, 72% Bob Dole, 21% +51
--2000 Al Gore, 62% George W. Bush, 35% +27
--2004 John Kerry, 58% George W. Bush, 40% +18
--2008 Barack Obama, 67% John McCain, 31% +36
--2012 Barack Obama, 71% Mitt Romney, 27% +44
Republicans don't understand even the simple things. You would think that everyone would know that experience comes with time in office. Their minds are small and their thoughts are few and the few they do have damages everything they mishandle.Each one is a viable candidate, sane, and more experienced than the current occupant. I might add, they're smarter than Clinton too.
Never let it be said that passwind doe NOT have a sense of humor.....
Delusional, YES....but still with an uncanny sense of humor as the above post clearly shows.
That's a clown question, broLOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
Question: If someone offered to make a $30 bet with you whether in the next election at least 65% of Hispanic vote (as measured by exit polls) will for for the Republican Presidential candidate, would you take that bet? If not, why not?
The Dums have alienated Hispanic voters by patronizing them and trying to turn them in House Negroes. Check Hispanic voting in Texas in the last gubernatorial election.LOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
This nitwit pulls "facts" out of his behind:
The Hispanic Vote in Presidential Elections, 1980-2012
Pew Research Center ^ | 11/7/2012
Posted on 11/12/2012 8:58:29 AM by ReaganÜberAlles
--1980 Jimmy Carter, 56% Ronald Reagan, 35% +21
--1984 Walter Mondale, 61% Ronald Reagan, 37% +24
--1988 Michael Dukakis, 69% George H.W. Bush, 30% +39
--1992 Bill Clinton, 61% George H.W. Bush, 25% +36
--1996 Bill Clinton, 72% Bob Dole, 21% +51
--2000 Al Gore, 62% George W. Bush, 35% +27
--2004 John Kerry, 58% George W. Bush, 40% +18
--2008 Barack Obama, 67% John McCain, 31% +36
--2012 Barack Obama, 71% Mitt Romney, 27% +44
That's a clown question, broLOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
Question: If someone offered to make a $30 bet with you whether in the next election at least 65% of Hispanic vote (as measured by exit polls) will for for the Republican Presidential candidate, would you take that bet? If not, why not?
You're a dumbshit. Get lost.That's a clown question, broLOL!
The Democrats have one candidate, a rich old white woman. The GOP has the most diverse slate of candidates any party has offered.
Democrats have blacks in the back pocket. But they wont show up to vote for Hillary. Obama won in 2012 only because of unpredicted black voter turnout (and fraud). That wont happen again. And the GOP will pocket the Hispanic vote as Hispanics are naturally GOP voters.
Question: If someone offered to make a $30 bet with you whether in the next election at least 65% of Hispanic vote (as measured by exit polls) will for for the Republican Presidential candidate, would you take that bet? If not, why not?
No. It is a very serious one. One of the better ways of telling if people are serious or are just bullshitting is whether they are willing to stake money on something. Heck, I'd be willing to bet far more than $30 on this if you wanted to. So why not do it? Because internally you know it isn't going to happen?
