Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking. That’s why cons claim...

[Doc1]

...most media sources have a “liberal bias.”

Let’s take a look at all the major conservative news outlets (bullshit): Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars (god it’s pathetic), The Blaze, Forbes, Heritage. There might be a few I’m missing.

Now, anyone can tell MSNBC, TYT, Bill Maher, John Oliver or The Huffington Post are blatant liberal bias. These are outlets that have mostly opinionated content which are authored by outspoken liberals.

However, when it comes to the objective content you find on ABC, CBS, Washington Post, NYT, etc., conservatives still think these are liberal outlets even though they just report, you know, facts. They also have a history of highlighting negative press about Hillary, Obama, and other democrats. Their content is based around facts, statistics, and full context. Such concepts rarely align with a republican perspective.

This is why the rightwing rejects any media outlet besides the conservative ones I mentioned. Republicans just can’t figure out what is objectively true.

One more thread of you affirming yourself, poor lil Billy.

 

[BluesLegend]

Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking.

that's some funny shit right there you libs crack me up.

 

[Billy000]

...most media sources have a “liberal bias.”

Let’s take a look at all the major conservative news outlets (bullshit): Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars (god it’s pathetic), The Blaze, Forbes, Heritage. There might be a few I’m missing.

Now, anyone can tell MSNBC, TYT, Bill Maher, John Oliver or The Huffington Post are blatant liberal bias. These are outlets that have mostly opinionated content which are authored by outspoken liberals.

However, when it comes to the objective content you find on ABC, CBS, Washington Post, NYT, etc., conservatives still think these are liberal outlets even though they just report, you know, facts. They also have a history of highlighting negative press about Hillary, Obama, and other democrats. Their content is based around facts, statistics, and full context. Such concepts rarely align with a republican perspective.

This is why the rightwing rejects any media outlet besides the conservative ones I mentioned. Republicans just can’t figure out what is objectively true.

One more thread of you affirming yourself, poor lil Billy.

I see a lot of one sentence flame posts like this on this thread. It tells me you don’t have an argument for why I’m wrong.

 

[Billy000]

Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking.

that's some funny shit right there you libs crack me up.

The truth can be funny if you want it to be. Good for you!

 

[whitehall]

CBS? Maybe "progressives" forgot but It wasn't that long ago when CBS tried to skew a presidential election with forged documents.

 

[bripat9643]

"Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking."

 

[ptbw forever]

Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking

I've seen little critical thinking or thinking of any kind coming from Regressives.

This is just one of his republicans are stupid troll threads, it all he knows.


.

Well today’s republicans really are stupid. I don’t think all conservatives are stupid though.

Today’s Democrats are mostly legally retarded.

 

[BluesLegend]

Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking.

that's some funny shit right there you libs crack me up.

The truth can be funny if you want it to be. Good for you!

Lib please, you people will be destroyed and scrubbed from history.

 

[Billy000]

"Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking."

Maybe if you one day - you know - read an actual book, you’d understand I’m right.

 

[protectionist]

However, when it comes to the objective content you find on ABC, CBS, Washington Post, NYT, etc., conservatives still think these are liberal outlets even though they just report, you know, facts. They also have a history of highlighting negative press about Hillary, Obama, and other democrats. Their content is based around facts, statistics, and full context. Such concepts rarely align with a republican perspective.

This is why the rightwing rejects any media outlet besides the conservative ones I mentioned. Republicans just can’t figure out what is objectively true.

Is this a joke ?

 

[protectionist]

For Christ's sake, Billy...the editor of The New York Times admitted that they were liberally biased quite some time ago! You can report "facts" and still be totally biased simply by what facts you choose to report on and which facts you don't. I don't "reject" any of the media outlets you've named...I'm simply not naive enough to believe that they aren't biased when they have shown time after time that they ARE!

NYT hasn't been objective since 1982.

 

[bripat9643]

"Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking."

Maybe if you one day - you know - read an actual book, you’d understand I’m right.

I have read mountains of books, douchebag. They all tell me that you're a moron who doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

...most media sources have a “liberal bias.”

Let’s take a look at all the major conservative news outlets (bullshit): Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars (god it’s pathetic), The Blaze, Forbes, Heritage. There might be a few I’m missing.

Now, anyone can tell MSNBC, TYT, Bill Maher, John Oliver or The Huffington Post are blatant liberal bias. These are outlets that have mostly opinionated content which are authored by outspoken liberals.

However, when it comes to the objective content you find on ABC, CBS, Washington Post, NYT, etc., conservatives still think these are liberal outlets even though they just report, you know, facts. They also have a history of highlighting negative press about Hillary, Obama, and other democrats. Their content is based around facts, statistics, and full context. Such concepts rarely align with a republican perspective.

This is why the rightwing rejects any media outlet besides the conservative ones I mentioned. Republicans just can’t figure out what is objectively true.

And they are too ignorant to know it which is played on and milked by Fake Fox News and the rest.

I often wonder what conservative outlets USMB members watch. Is it Fox? Where do they get their information?

It's called the internet. You can pick and choose stories that look interesting

Okay like what? Give me some examples.

Al - Jazeera!

Yes, I actually read their site for news and opinions along with the BBC!

So open minded people read the opposition and weigh all sides before coming to any conclusion.

Maybe you should give it a try and Al - Jazeera is bias but nowhere nearly as bias as Democracy Now...

 

[Avatar4321]

Progressivism is based upon facts and critical thinking.

that's some funny shit right there you libs crack me up.

The truth can be funny if you want it to be. Good for you!

Sure it can. The truth is often very funny.

Your op had nothing to do with the truth though

 

[Avatar4321]

However, when it comes to the objective content you find on ABC, CBS, Washington Post, NYT, etc., conservatives still think these are liberal outlets even though they just report, you know, facts. They also have a history of highlighting negative press about Hillary, Obama, and other democrats. Their content is based around facts, statistics, and full context. Such concepts rarely align with a republican perspective.

This is why the rightwing rejects any media outlet besides the conservative ones I mentioned. Republicans just can’t figure out what is objectively true.

Is this a joke ?

Well, most of us are laughing at it

 

[mikegriffith1]

Yeah, look how well liberal economic policy worked under Obama. Funny that liberals hail Bill Clinton's economic record when Clinton implemented a center-right economic policy, one that included huge tax cuts, spending restraint, and leaving Reagan's tax cuts substantially intact.

The Facts About Tax Cuts, Revenue, and Growth

 

[Harry Dresden]

...most media sources have a “liberal bias.”

Let’s take a look at all the major conservative news outlets (bullshit): Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars (god it’s pathetic), The Blaze, Forbes, Heritage. There might be a few I’m missing.

Now, anyone can tell MSNBC, TYT, Bill Maher, John Oliver or The Huffington Post are blatant liberal bias. These are outlets that have mostly opinionated content which are authored by outspoken liberals.

However, when it comes to the objective content you find on ABC, CBS, Washington Post, NYT, etc., conservatives still think these are liberal outlets even though they just report, you know, facts. They also have a history of highlighting negative press about Hillary, Obama, and other democrats. Their content is based around facts, statistics, and full context. Such concepts rarely align with a republican perspective.

This is why the rightwing rejects any media outlet besides the conservative ones I mentioned. Republicans just can’t figure out what is objectively true.

And they are too ignorant to know it which is played on and milked by Fake Fox News and the rest.

I often wonder what conservative outlets USMB members watch. Is it Fox? Where do they get their information?

i get all my news from dean and tiger.....

 

[ptbw forever]

For Christ's sake, Billy...the editor of The New York Times admitted that they were liberally biased quite some time ago! You can report "facts" and still be totally biased simply by what facts you choose to report on and which facts you don't. I don't "reject" any of the media outlets you've named...I'm simply not naive enough to believe that they aren't biased when they have shown time after time that they ARE!

NYT hasn't been objective since 1982.

Longer than that.