Progressives vs. Homeschooling

[ThoughtCrimes]

Did you now! Here was my response to that sophistry at that time on the other thread, to which you couldn't respond because it fixed the lies as yours and you could not deny them!

"Really? Then where the Hell are your words, your thoughts? Why is there no lead in or no conclusion? How is the TOTALITY of that which you COPIED set aside as distinctly the work of another and not your own. Where are the REQUIRED quotation marks? Why the deviation in paragraphing from the original? Why the change in layout to your normal affected "style"? Why the improper change in the lead paragraph changing the number 8, established as the eighth point of the piece, changed to 1 as in YOUR usual style of bulleting? Why the unattributed font color change?

None of that is your work, but rather, that of another. Dropping the source at the bottom as you did is nothing but a provision for plausible deniability in your mind.

That is Rand Paul style PLAGURISM. You are really pissed because you got caught and exposed as a lazy cheat, a PLAGURIST and now a liar! You're a dishonest person with failed character!

Q.E.D." [Emphasis Added]

You were caught PLAGURIZING and then trying to cover your lie with false bravado! You corrected your bent toward PLAGURISM and I noted your attempt to redeem yourself this AM back on page 7 of this thread, but others started noticing the definite change in your style. Ya really should have kept your trap closed. Sometimes folks don't know when to just STOP rather than digging the hole they put themselves into deeper.

Our entire earlier exchange can be read on the thread, Lying About the Nuclear Deal, Page 12 if anyone is interested.

1. pla·gia·rism
ˈplājəˌrizəm/
noun

1. the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. Google.

Since I used both quotation marks, and provided the link to the complete original, clearly, you are a liar attempting to score points without being able to defeat the material presented.

2. Now....let's go on to give examples Liberal plagiarism: taking the words of the NYTimes, MSNBC, the DNC, Obama, Jon Stewart, etc.......and never giving credit to the source.

You simpletons do it every day.

I never do it.


3. Every OP I provide is part of a thread of 5 to 10 panels which lead to an undeniable conclusion......generally revealing how wrong, malevolent, and dishonest Liberals are...

...and that is why you have attempted to claim plagiarism.
It is the best you can do.

In short, you are, and will always be, a low-life liar.

The fact that your post I critiqued initially now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point. I don't know how they were added after the fact and I don't really care at this time. The fact is your remaining offenses against Fair Use of a copyrighted work still remain, including those I didn't mention previously such as the use of ellipses. Proper attribution of another's work demands that any alterations to the original be noted in an accepted manner. You failed to do that to the point it looked like your usual "style". But the problem with that was the entire post was a copy and paste and totally bereft of any word or thought of your own. That is PLAGIARISM!

Even if I erred and missed the quotation marks which now, mystically and magically appear on the post, even IF that were the case, it is still a plagiarized bit without proper the attribution. It is in the Rand Paul style of plagiarism as I stated before.

Rail on all you wish against it, but your protestations will not affect the truth of the matter. You're a PLAGIARIST! You might want to correct that defect and take some writing classes to learn how to write and attribute correctly.

I'm anything but a liar, but if that puts the wind up your skirt to deflect from your own characteristics you wish to conceal, it won't change either the Moon or the Stars or the knowledge of others to the contrary.

"... now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point."

See....another lie from you.

I've never added any quotation marks.

Try to learn what words mean before you attempt to use them.

There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!

BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. pla·gia·rism
ˈplājəˌrizəm/
noun

1. the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. Google.

Since I used both quotation marks, and provided the link to the complete original, clearly, you are a liar attempting to score points without being able to defeat the material presented.

2. Now....let's go on to give examples Liberal plagiarism: taking the words of the NYTimes, MSNBC, the DNC, Obama, Jon Stewart, etc.......and never giving credit to the source.

You simpletons do it every day.

I never do it.


3. Every OP I provide is part of a thread of 5 to 10 panels which lead to an undeniable conclusion......generally revealing how wrong, malevolent, and dishonest Liberals are...

...and that is why you have attempted to claim plagiarism.
It is the best you can do.

In short, you are, and will always be, a low-life liar.

The fact that your post I critiqued initially now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point. I don't know how they were added after the fact and I don't really care at this time. The fact is your remaining offenses against Fair Use of a copyrighted work still remain, including those I didn't mention previously such as the use of ellipses. Proper attribution of another's work demands that any alterations to the original be noted in an accepted manner. You failed to do that to the point it looked like your usual "style". But the problem with that was the entire post was a copy and paste and totally bereft of any word or thought of your own. That is PLAGIARISM!

Even if I erred and missed the quotation marks which now, mystically and magically appear on the post, even IF that were the case, it is still a plagiarized bit without proper the attribution. It is in the Rand Paul style of plagiarism as I stated before.

Rail on all you wish against it, but your protestations will not affect the truth of the matter. You're a PLAGIARIST! You might want to correct that defect and take some writing classes to learn how to write and attribute correctly.

I'm anything but a liar, but if that puts the wind up your skirt to deflect from your own characteristics you wish to conceal, it won't change either the Moon or the Stars or the knowledge of others to the contrary.

"... now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point."

See....another lie from you.

I've never added any quotation marks.

Try to learn what words mean before you attempt to use them.

There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!

BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

 

[danielpalos]

The fact that your post I critiqued initially now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point. I don't know how they were added after the fact and I don't really care at this time. The fact is your remaining offenses against Fair Use of a copyrighted work still remain, including those I didn't mention previously such as the use of ellipses. Proper attribution of another's work demands that any alterations to the original be noted in an accepted manner. You failed to do that to the point it looked like your usual "style". But the problem with that was the entire post was a copy and paste and totally bereft of any word or thought of your own. That is PLAGIARISM!

Even if I erred and missed the quotation marks which now, mystically and magically appear on the post, even IF that were the case, it is still a plagiarized bit without proper the attribution. It is in the Rand Paul style of plagiarism as I stated before.

Rail on all you wish against it, but your protestations will not affect the truth of the matter. You're a PLAGIARIST! You might want to correct that defect and take some writing classes to learn how to write and attribute correctly.

I'm anything but a liar, but if that puts the wind up your skirt to deflect from your own characteristics you wish to conceal, it won't change either the Moon or the Stars or the knowledge of others to the contrary.

"... now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point."

See....another lie from you.

I've never added any quotation marks.

Try to learn what words mean before you attempt to use them.

There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!

BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

I only look at the short skirt of the cute chic you use as an avatar.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

The fact that your post I critiqued initially now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point. I don't know how they were added after the fact and I don't really care at this time. The fact is your remaining offenses against Fair Use of a copyrighted work still remain, including those I didn't mention previously such as the use of ellipses. Proper attribution of another's work demands that any alterations to the original be noted in an accepted manner. You failed to do that to the point it looked like your usual "style". But the problem with that was the entire post was a copy and paste and totally bereft of any word or thought of your own. That is PLAGIARISM!

Even if I erred and missed the quotation marks which now, mystically and magically appear on the post, even IF that were the case, it is still a plagiarized bit without proper the attribution. It is in the Rand Paul style of plagiarism as I stated before.

Rail on all you wish against it, but your protestations will not affect the truth of the matter. You're a PLAGIARIST! You might want to correct that defect and take some writing classes to learn how to write and attribute correctly.

I'm anything but a liar, but if that puts the wind up your skirt to deflect from your own characteristics you wish to conceal, it won't change either the Moon or the Stars or the knowledge of others to the contrary.

"... now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point."

See....another lie from you.

I've never added any quotation marks.

Try to learn what words mean before you attempt to use them.

There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!

BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

What "Never Happened"? What is the "thing" you have never done? You won't say because you know I can find examples of your PLAGIARISM easily! Denying it and heaping your disparagement on others to deflect from your perfidy does not change the truth.

And almost every time you call someone a liar, it's you doing the lying because you never make the argument to prove you're correct! But then, you don't have the ability to create a cogent, fallacy free argument. Argumentum ad hominem is your strong suit.

I was on another board years ago having to deal with your doppelgänger who was also from NYC. She was as much fun to play with because she was so fucking predictable, too! Must be something in the water.

Almost forgot...Have a Nice Day!

 

[danielpalos]

I sometimes focus on ergonomics when watching porn flicks; i am hoping to submit a hypothesis to Dr. Humpalot for credit through independent studies (at home).

Nude twerking offers a great view of body dynamics.

I love modern times.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"... now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point."

See....another lie from you.

I've never added any quotation marks.

Try to learn what words mean before you attempt to use them.

There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!

BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

What "Never Happened"? What is the "thing" you have never done? You won't say because you know I can find examples of your PLAGIARISM easily! Denying it and heaping your disparagement on others to deflect from your perfidy does not change the truth.

And almost every time you call someone a liar, it's you doing the lying because you never make the argument to prove you're correct! But then, you don't have the ability to create a cogent, fallacy free argument. Argumentum ad hominem is your strong suit.

I was on another board years ago having to deal with your doppelgänger who was also from NYC. She was as much fun to play with because she was so fucking predictable, too! Must be something in the water.

Almost forgot...Have a Nice Day!

Never happened, Sludge....

You're simply one of those hangers-on who resents the beatings I've been forced to administer.

I always cite the source, and correctly use quotation marks. Anyone who reads my posts will be able to identify you as the low-life liar that you have always been.

Your vulgarity reveals all one needs to know.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!

BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

What "Never Happened"? What is the "thing" you have never done? You won't say because you know I can find examples of your PLAGIARISM easily! Denying it and heaping your disparagement on others to deflect from your perfidy does not change the truth.

And almost every time you call someone a liar, it's you doing the lying because you never make the argument to prove you're correct! But then, you don't have the ability to create a cogent, fallacy free argument. Argumentum ad hominem is your strong suit.

I was on another board years ago having to deal with your doppelgänger who was also from NYC. She was as much fun to play with because she was so fucking predictable, too! Must be something in the water.

Almost forgot...Have a Nice Day!

Never happened, Sludge....

You're simply one of those hangers-on who resents the beatings I've been forced to administer.

I always cite the source, and correctly use quotation marks. Anyone who reads my posts will be able to identify you as the low-life liar that you have always been.

Your vulgarity reveals all one needs to know.

You always cite the source and use quotation marks? Well lets look at you post 204 on page 21 of this thread if that is true! Here's what you wrote with follow up below:

"Standardized test results for 16,000 home educated children, grades K-12, were analyzed in 1994 by researcher Dr. Brian Ray. He found the nationwide grand mean in reading for homeschoolers was at the 79th percentile; for language and math, the 73rd percentile. This ranking means home-educated students performed better than approximately 77% of the sample population on whom the test was normed. Nearly 80% of homeschooled children achieved individual scores above the national average and 54.7% of the 16,000 homeschoolers achieved individual scores in the top quarter of the population, more than double the number of conventional school students who score in the top quarter. 1

A Harvard University (MA) admissions officer said most of their home-educated students "have done very well. They usually are very motivated in what they do." Results of the SAT and SAT II, an essay, an interview, and a letter of recommendation are the main requirements for home-educated applicants. "[Transcripts are] irrelevant because a transcript is basically a comparison to other students in the school."
HSLDA Homeschooled Students Excel in College


Still, many admissions officials say they are becoming more at ease with applicants who took alternative paths, if for no other reason than it’s a booming market. Almost 2 million American students are educated at home, and more than 80 percent of colleges have formal policies for assessing these applicants – up from 52 percent in 2000.
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/apr/18/news/chi-homeschool_18apr18


The number of home-learners in Massachusetts is about 9,000—1.2% of all students—up from approximately 3,000 in 1983, said Patrick Farenga, publisher of Growing Without Schooling magazine in Cambridge, Mass. This increase is remarkable in an era of two-income families because it pretty much requires one dedicated parent (generally the mother) at some financial sacrifice.
Home-Schooled Kids Get Into Harvard And


For Carey, home-schooled since she was 2, acceptances are more than an entrance ticket to a college classroom--she's already taken courses and will earn a Harvard Extension School associate's degree (AA) in June--they are evidence her schooling is as rigorous and legitimate as those earning traditional high school diplomas.
http://www.dce.harvard.edu/pubs/alum/2003/12.html


Recent statistics from The College Board and the American College Testing Program (ACT) indicate that home schoolers are exceeding the national average test scores on both the SAT and the ACT college entrance exams. In 1999, the 2219 students who identified themselves as home schooled students on the SAT test, scored an average of 1083 (verbal 548, math 535), 67 points above the national average of 1016. A perfect SAT score is 1600. Also in 1999, 3616 home school students taking the ACT scored an average of 22.7, compared to the national average of 21, a perfect score being 36.
\College-bound Home Schoolers Make Headlines HSLDA National Center News



Everything I did was only possible because my parents were dedicated and loving enough to homeschool my sister and me. My mother, a former Montessori teacher and author of several children’s books, took the time to instruct us every day. Aside from textbook lessons, she had us perform many exercises designed to stimulate our creativity.
Homeschooling and College - HowStuffWorks" [Emphasis Added]

Are there any RED quotation marks at the beginning and end of any paragraph you added as part of attribution in any of those seven (7) paragraphs? So who's lying Chica? You're a PLAGIARIST plain and simple. You can keep digging, but the hole is just going to get deeper.

You keep dreaming about "winning", the source of lies and your alleged superiority. Such hubris! You really are a sad little person.

Bottom line; your post above I quoted puts the lie on you and there is no way for you to deny it TRUTHFULLY. There are other issues with your copy and paste, but you're not interested in the truth so I'll not waste my time.

 

[danielpalos]

I have recently watched documentaries on YouTube regarding materials science, astronomy and the latest advances in technology enabling our new understandings of life, the universe, and every Thing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liar.

I've never done any such thing.

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

What "Never Happened"? What is the "thing" you have never done? You won't say because you know I can find examples of your PLAGIARISM easily! Denying it and heaping your disparagement on others to deflect from your perfidy does not change the truth.

And almost every time you call someone a liar, it's you doing the lying because you never make the argument to prove you're correct! But then, you don't have the ability to create a cogent, fallacy free argument. Argumentum ad hominem is your strong suit.

I was on another board years ago having to deal with your doppelgänger who was also from NYC. She was as much fun to play with because she was so fucking predictable, too! Must be something in the water.

Almost forgot...Have a Nice Day!

Never happened, Sludge....

You're simply one of those hangers-on who resents the beatings I've been forced to administer.

I always cite the source, and correctly use quotation marks. Anyone who reads my posts will be able to identify you as the low-life liar that you have always been.

Your vulgarity reveals all one needs to know.

You always cite the source and use quotation marks? Well lets look at you post 204 on page 21 of this thread if that is true! Here's what you wrote with follow up below:

"Standardized test results for 16,000 home educated children, grades K-12, were analyzed in 1994 by researcher Dr. Brian Ray. He found the nationwide grand mean in reading for homeschoolers was at the 79th percentile; for language and math, the 73rd percentile. This ranking means home-educated students performed better than approximately 77% of the sample population on whom the test was normed. Nearly 80% of homeschooled children achieved individual scores above the national average and 54.7% of the 16,000 homeschoolers achieved individual scores in the top quarter of the population, more than double the number of conventional school students who score in the top quarter. 1

A Harvard University (MA) admissions officer said most of their home-educated students "have done very well. They usually are very motivated in what they do." Results of the SAT and SAT II, an essay, an interview, and a letter of recommendation are the main requirements for home-educated applicants. "[Transcripts are] irrelevant because a transcript is basically a comparison to other students in the school."
HSLDA Homeschooled Students Excel in College


Still, many admissions officials say they are becoming more at ease with applicants who took alternative paths, if for no other reason than it’s a booming market. Almost 2 million American students are educated at home, and more than 80 percent of colleges have formal policies for assessing these applicants – up from 52 percent in 2000.
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/apr/18/news/chi-homeschool_18apr18


The number of home-learners in Massachusetts is about 9,000—1.2% of all students—up from approximately 3,000 in 1983, said Patrick Farenga, publisher of Growing Without Schooling magazine in Cambridge, Mass. This increase is remarkable in an era of two-income families because it pretty much requires one dedicated parent (generally the mother) at some financial sacrifice.
Home-Schooled Kids Get Into Harvard And


For Carey, home-schooled since she was 2, acceptances are more than an entrance ticket to a college classroom--she's already taken courses and will earn a Harvard Extension School associate's degree (AA) in June--they are evidence her schooling is as rigorous and legitimate as those earning traditional high school diplomas.
http://www.dce.harvard.edu/pubs/alum/2003/12.html


Recent statistics from The College Board and the American College Testing Program (ACT) indicate that home schoolers are exceeding the national average test scores on both the SAT and the ACT college entrance exams. In 1999, the 2219 students who identified themselves as home schooled students on the SAT test, scored an average of 1083 (verbal 548, math 535), 67 points above the national average of 1016. A perfect SAT score is 1600. Also in 1999, 3616 home school students taking the ACT scored an average of 22.7, compared to the national average of 21, a perfect score being 36.
\College-bound Home Schoolers Make Headlines HSLDA National Center News



Everything I did was only possible because my parents were dedicated and loving enough to homeschool my sister and me. My mother, a former Montessori teacher and author of several children’s books, took the time to instruct us every day. Aside from textbook lessons, she had us perform many exercises designed to stimulate our creativity.
Homeschooling and College - HowStuffWorks" [Emphasis Added]

Are there any RED quotation marks at the beginning and end of any paragraph you added as part of attribution in any of those seven (7) paragraphs? So who's lying Chica? You're a PLAGIARIST plain and simple. You can keep digging, but the hole is just going to get deeper.

You keep dreaming about "winning", the source of lies and your alleged superiority. Such hubris! You really are a sad little person.

Bottom line; your post above I quoted puts the lie on you and there is no way for you to deny it TRUTHFULLY. There are other issues with your copy and paste, but you're not interested in the truth so I'll not waste my time.

Thanks for proving that I always cite the source....and I see lots of quotation marks too.

Keep up the good work...I will,too.

 

[Mr Natural]

No.
My children are.

Why do you ask?

And with the amount of time you spend on this message board, I'm sure the kids are getting a world class education.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.

What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?

Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.

When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.

Never happened.

Anyone can look at any of my posts and recognize that you are a lying sack of offal.

What "Never Happened"? What is the "thing" you have never done? You won't say because you know I can find examples of your PLAGIARISM easily! Denying it and heaping your disparagement on others to deflect from your perfidy does not change the truth.

And almost every time you call someone a liar, it's you doing the lying because you never make the argument to prove you're correct! But then, you don't have the ability to create a cogent, fallacy free argument. Argumentum ad hominem is your strong suit.

I was on another board years ago having to deal with your doppelgänger who was also from NYC. She was as much fun to play with because she was so fucking predictable, too! Must be something in the water.

Almost forgot...Have a Nice Day!

Never happened, Sludge....

You're simply one of those hangers-on who resents the beatings I've been forced to administer.

I always cite the source, and correctly use quotation marks. Anyone who reads my posts will be able to identify you as the low-life liar that you have always been.

Your vulgarity reveals all one needs to know.

You always cite the source and use quotation marks? Well lets look at you post 204 on page 21 of this thread if that is true! Here's what you wrote with follow up below:

"Standardized test results for 16,000 home educated children, grades K-12, were analyzed in 1994 by researcher Dr. Brian Ray. He found the nationwide grand mean in reading for homeschoolers was at the 79th percentile; for language and math, the 73rd percentile. This ranking means home-educated students performed better than approximately 77% of the sample population on whom the test was normed. Nearly 80% of homeschooled children achieved individual scores above the national average and 54.7% of the 16,000 homeschoolers achieved individual scores in the top quarter of the population, more than double the number of conventional school students who score in the top quarter. 1

A Harvard University (MA) admissions officer said most of their home-educated students "have done very well. They usually are very motivated in what they do." Results of the SAT and SAT II, an essay, an interview, and a letter of recommendation are the main requirements for home-educated applicants. "[Transcripts are] irrelevant because a transcript is basically a comparison to other students in the school."
HSLDA Homeschooled Students Excel in College


Still, many admissions officials say they are becoming more at ease with applicants who took alternative paths, if for no other reason than it’s a booming market. Almost 2 million American students are educated at home, and more than 80 percent of colleges have formal policies for assessing these applicants – up from 52 percent in 2000.
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/apr/18/news/chi-homeschool_18apr18


The number of home-learners in Massachusetts is about 9,000—1.2% of all students—up from approximately 3,000 in 1983, said Patrick Farenga, publisher of Growing Without Schooling magazine in Cambridge, Mass. This increase is remarkable in an era of two-income families because it pretty much requires one dedicated parent (generally the mother) at some financial sacrifice.
Home-Schooled Kids Get Into Harvard And


For Carey, home-schooled since she was 2, acceptances are more than an entrance ticket to a college classroom--she's already taken courses and will earn a Harvard Extension School associate's degree (AA) in June--they are evidence her schooling is as rigorous and legitimate as those earning traditional high school diplomas.
http://www.dce.harvard.edu/pubs/alum/2003/12.html


Recent statistics from The College Board and the American College Testing Program (ACT) indicate that home schoolers are exceeding the national average test scores on both the SAT and the ACT college entrance exams. In 1999, the 2219 students who identified themselves as home schooled students on the SAT test, scored an average of 1083 (verbal 548, math 535), 67 points above the national average of 1016. A perfect SAT score is 1600. Also in 1999, 3616 home school students taking the ACT scored an average of 22.7, compared to the national average of 21, a perfect score being 36.
\College-bound Home Schoolers Make Headlines HSLDA National Center News



Everything I did was only possible because my parents were dedicated and loving enough to homeschool my sister and me. My mother, a former Montessori teacher and author of several children’s books, took the time to instruct us every day. Aside from textbook lessons, she had us perform many exercises designed to stimulate our creativity.
Homeschooling and College - HowStuffWorks" [Emphasis Added]

Are there any RED quotation marks at the beginning and end of any paragraph you added as part of attribution in any of those seven (7) paragraphs? So who's lying Chica? You're a PLAGIARIST plain and simple. You can keep digging, but the hole is just going to get deeper.

You keep dreaming about "winning", the source of lies and your alleged superiority. Such hubris! You really are a sad little person.

Bottom line; your post above I quoted puts the lie on you and there is no way for you to deny it TRUTHFULLY. There are other issues with your copy and paste, but you're not interested in the truth so I'll not waste my time.

Thanks for proving that I always cite the source....and I see lots of quotation marks too.

Keep up the good work...I will,too.

The quotation marks are those of the authors and my own citing your perfidy, and not a single one was placed by you in your post I quoted from page 21 post 204 of this thread. That proves, beyond any doubt, you are not only a PLAGIARIST, but now also a confirmed liar. Why the hell do you keep digging that hole you're in deeper?

 

[danielpalos]

I would love to see the dark side of the moon of cute chics wearing miniskirts; should i try to build an anatomical observatory?