Progressive turn a 180 degrees on Judge nomanation

[mudwhistle]

Would you have preferred if Democrats had simply blocked Kavanaugh's hearing entirely until there was a Democrat President that could withdraw his nomination and bring in a new guy?

They don't have the right to.
So what we have instead is a transparent attempt to thwart the will of the people at any cost.

As someone once said.....elections have consequences.

 

[JBvM]

Would you have preferred if Democrats had simply blocked Kavanaugh's hearing entirely until there was a Democrat President that could withdraw his nomination and bring in a new guy?

They don't have the right to.
So what we have instead is a transparent attempt to thwart the will of the people at any cost.

As someone once said.....elections have consequences.

President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Would you have preferred if Democrats had simply blocked Kavanaugh's hearing entirely until there was a Democrat President that could withdraw his nomination and bring in a new guy?

They don't have the right to.
So what we have instead is a transparent attempt to thwart the will of the people at any cost.

As someone once said.....elections have consequences.

President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland

Yeah, that was funny!

 

[JBvM]

Would you have preferred if Democrats had simply blocked Kavanaugh's hearing entirely until there was a Democrat President that could withdraw his nomination and bring in a new guy?

They don't have the right to.
So what we have instead is a transparent attempt to thwart the will of the people at any cost.

As someone once said.....elections have consequences.

President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland

Yeah, that was funny!

almost as funny as a Trump UN speech

 

[donald]

QUESTION
I have a question that begs to be answered - ford says in her letter ‘Both loudly stumbled down the stairwell, at which point other persons at the house were talking with them. I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home.”
This would mean that after just being “sexually assaulted” she left her other female friend at the house without warning her about what had supposedly just happened to her. She would’ve just left her to fend for herself. Is this plausible? What would this say about ford & her care about another female - her intimate friend, Leland Ingham?
SECOND QUESTION
If ford was so scared that she left the house without warning leland about what allegedly just had happened to her- then when they (ford & leland) next met or talked on the phone - which could’ve even been the next day - why was leland not at least then told about this purported foiled savaging of her? For ford not to have talked to leland about such a fearful experience surpasses any level of credibility.
I find it impossible to believe that ford