Progressive turn a 180 degrees on Judge nomanation

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Joann Stubbs, Sep 8, 2018.

  1. Joann Stubbs
    Offline

    Joann Stubbs Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2018
    Messages:
    131
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Ratings:
    +101
    Democrats on the committee have gone so far as to dispense with long-established Senate decorum and rules in order to fire up their base heading into the November midterm elections.

    It’s a sad commentary that in retrospect, now-Justice Elena Kagan’s confirmation in 2010 seems like something from a different era, when senators on both sides of the aisle took the vetting process for the highest court in the land seriously.



    Now it changes.
    At the time, then-Democratic Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont called on all members of the committee to be fair during the hearings and abstain from questioning the integrity or independence of President Obama’s nominee.

    Republicans did just that, prompting Kagan to publicly thank then-Ranking Member Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., and Senate Republicans for giving her “such respectful and expeditious consideration.”


    During this week’s hearing – starting from the moment Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, introduced Judge Kavanaugh and his family – the proceedings were interrupted by one Democratic senator after another, demanding a vote to delay the hearing. Then, like clockwork, came the shouts of protesters in the crowd.

    If these childish antics and partisan outbursts appeared to be a well-coordinated effort on the part of Democrats to obstruct the confirmation of Kavanaugh, it’s because they were.

    News organizations reported that on the eve of the hearing, Judiciary Committee Democrats hosted a conference call with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y, and plotted a “protest strategy” to disrupt the proceedings.
     
    • Winner Winner x 11
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. BlackFlag
    Online

    BlackFlag Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    14,517
    Thanks Received:
    1,317
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    3 sheets to the wind, so to speak
    Ratings:
    +10,301
    Would you have preferred if Democrats had simply blocked Kavanaugh's hearing entirely until there was a Democrat President that could withdraw his nomination and bring in a new guy?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,268
    Thanks Received:
    12,116
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +41,033





    Biden did it too. So why do you care?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. BlackFlag
    Online

    BlackFlag Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    14,517
    Thanks Received:
    1,317
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    3 sheets to the wind, so to speak
    Ratings:
    +10,301
    Name the nominee that Biden blocked. I'll wait as long as you want.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    98,635
    Thanks Received:
    18,073
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +63,181
    Clear all the democrat guests from the gallery
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,268
    Thanks Received:
    12,116
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +41,033





    He was the most prominent Senator to ever suggest it.

    Joe Biden Argued for Delaying Supreme Court Picks in 1992

    But in a speech on the Senate floor in June 1992, Mr. Biden, then the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said there should be a different standard for a Supreme Court vacancy “that would occur in the full throes of an election year.” The president should follow the example of “a majority of his predecessors” and delay naming a replacement, Mr. Biden said. If he goes forward before then, the Senate should wait to consider the nomination.

    “Some will criticize such a decision and say that it was nothing more than an attempt to save a seat on the court in hopes that a Democrat will be permitted to fill it, but that would not be our intention,” Mr. Biden said at the time. “It would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is underway, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over.

    Joe Biden Argued for Delaying Supreme Court Picks in 1992
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  7. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    21,882
    Thanks Received:
    4,154
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,807
    Yeah, let them go with that.

    They have already publically announced -- well before any hearing -- that they intend to vote no. Not on the basis if his qualifications, but on the basis of they don't like Trump.

    I would prefer that they act like mature adults. I hope that the conservative side of the country has taken note and made copies of the childish antics and that they show up predominantly in political ads all across the country.

    Because this is what the Democrat party is all about anymore. Childish temper tantrums.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Coyote
    Offline

    Coyote Varmint Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    68,727
    Thanks Received:
    12,153
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    in between
    Ratings:
    +34,631

    What changed?

    Simple. What the Republicans did to Garland. Start there.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. Tilly
    Offline

    Tilly Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2015
    Messages:
    13,287
    Thanks Received:
    4,779
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Erob: Where the Sun Sets West of Phoenecia
    Ratings:
    +19,846
    I think people would prefer the Left stopped acting like tards throwing their toys out of the pram at every opportunity.

    upload_2018-9-8_22-44-48.jpeg

    And just like tantrum throwing cry babies, you should be ignored and / or laughed at.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    21,882
    Thanks Received:
    4,154
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,807
    Yet again, Ted Cruz nailed this issue right on the head of the nail.

    This SCOTUS nominee is a nominee that the people voted for.

     

Share This Page