Progressive Left Wing Liberal Party

Discussion in 'Politics' started by American_Jihad, May 31, 2012.

  1. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,902
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +3,248
    The Origins of Leftist Racial Orthodoxy

    May 31, 2012 By Michael Filozof


    If "diversity" is good, why do liberals congregate in lily-white enclaves like Vermont (the whitest state in the Union, according to the Census) and Marin County, California? White liberals hector others incessantly about the need for "diversity," but most have no interest in living in neighborhoods with large numbers of blacks. The ideal society in the liberal mind always seems to be a Scandinavian socialist one (which is to say that liberals strive to make the U.S. more like some of the most uniformly white nations in the world).

    The liberal enforcers of racial correctness are quick to decry the evils of racism, yet they are quite willing to practice it themselves in the form of affirmative action -- and they are strangely silent when blacks engage in "hate crimes" against whites. Conservatives have been increasingly willing to point out these and other hypocrisies of our racial orthodoxy, but they invariably fail to understand its true origins.

    What drives our contemporary racial orthodoxy? Many conservatives mistakenly believe that liberals obsessed by race are afflicted with "white guilt." Not so. The truth about racial matters in the U.S. is this: racial issues are not actually about race. In the hands of the progressive left, race is a tool used by powerful whites against other whites; specifically, race is a weapon used by liberals to bludgeon conservatives and delegitimize conservative, patriotic values.


    But it has not always been so.

    Prior to World War II, progressives and leftists -- like Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger -- viewed blacks as inferior human scum who should be eliminated through eugenic hygiene. But after World War II, "progressive" thinking about race underwent an astonishing metamorphosis. The American left forged a strategic alliance with blacks, using race to attack the core values of an American society they had now come to despise as the ultimate evil.

    ---


    The White Negro is perhaps the most important work of literature in postwar America. It provided a blueprint for the cultural revolution of the 1960s, and in hindsight, it explains nearly all left-wing, anti-conservative behavior since. If blacks were social outcasts in American life, then the white enemies of traditional American values would align with them. An immoderate drunk like the late Sen. Edward Kennedy -- who was kicked out of Harvard for cheating, then killed a young girl he was presumably cheating on his wife with, and got away with it -- could not possibly point the finger at blacks and tell them to be honest, chaste, and sober. He could, however, falsely accuse Judge Robert Bork of wanting blacks to "sit at segregated lunch counters" to deflect attention from his own behavior. And it worked. (Today, following the same "enemy of my enemy is my friend" strategy, leftists align themselves with Islamic terrorists and radicals, under whose rule they would never actually want to live.)

    ---


    Left-wing racial rhetoric about "fairness" and "equality" and "non-discrimination" has been used to conceal a subterranean leftist agenda of anti-Americanism and anti-conservatism for over fifty years. Conservatives persist in stupidly taking this rhetoric at face value; hence, they always find themselves on the racial defensive.

    Conservatives need to stop being suckered by this leftist con game, and they need to do it before November.


    Read more: Articles: The Origins of Leftist Racial Orthodoxy
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,902
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +3,248
    Are Liberals Immoral?

    5/31/12 By Jeffrey Folks



    Yes, liberals are immoral. The liberal power elite are selfish, hypocritical, arrogant, self-righteous, and, worst of all, destructive of those around them. They are willing to saddle everyone else with rules and regulations that do not apply to them, and with higher taxes that they somehow escape paying. The Buffett Rule might sound like a great idea, but it would never apply to the Buffetts of this world. Or the Kerrys, Kennedys, or any other left-wing billionaire.

    Liberal do-gooders are always coming up with lovely schemes for redistributing other people's money and managing other people's lives. The problem is that all of these schemes do more harm than good. Welfare, which redistributes wealth to those who cannot work but also to those who avoid working or underreport income, is funded on the backs of those who actually do work. "Saving the planet" costs jobs but never actually saves anything. Killing fossil fuels increases energy costs and triggers inflation across the board. Yet the liberal elite blithely support every cause that comes along with no consideration of the cost to ordinary people. In doing so, they pad their already inflated sense of self-importance, and at no cost to themselves.

    Scratch the surface of the liberal elite, and you will find a monstrous contempt for those "beneath" them. Liberals like Barack Obama live and breathe in a realm of utter disdain for ordinary Americans, including congressmen who hail from what the president likes to call "Palookaville." It is not just that they are out of touch; it is that they despise what is normal and decent. They would no more live in the heartland or send their kids to a public school than they would forego an exemption engineered solely to save them money -- the same tax break for the rich that they publicly decry as soooo unfair. It's no surprise that several prominent liberal Democrats made their fortunes as slum lords and ambulance-chasers. Others just married their money.

    There's nothing wrong with making money, of course. Mitt Romney earned every penny of his fortune, and to his credit he has never apologized for his success. But the liberal game -- the Kennedy game -- is to pretend to side with the poor and, by doing so, gain political power so as to further line one's own pockets. In all of this, the liberal elite are utterly cynical. I didn't notice any bottle-washers or cleaning ladies admitted to George Clooney's $40,000-per-person fundraiser for President Obama, nor any middle-class Americans, either. The liberal elite's contempt for the rest of us was palpable when Nancy Pelosi noted that "every week we don't pass a Stimulus bill, 500 million Americans lose their jobs," or when in 2004 Teresa Heinz Kerry called Elizabeth Edwards a "mother earth person" who still had a brain.

    ---


    I have yet to hear the Kennedys, the Kerrys, or the Obamas, or any member of the liberal elite, speak with anything but disdain for the faith-centered life. I wish it were not so, but that is why it really does not surprise me that so many of them come to a bad end. If allowed to continue governing, they will bring the country to a bad end as well.



    Read more: Articles: Are Liberals Immoral?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    the Progressive Left is not representative of Liberalism.

    end of bullshit story

    :cool:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,902
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +3,248
    Progressive Label Rehabilitates the Same Old Liberal Poison

    By Bob Ellis on December 29th, 2011

    ---
    Is it clear now why liberals want to call themselves “progressives”? Obviously, they recognize that most Americans reject liberalism for the corrosive, anti-American, self-destructive doctrine that it is. So they have to “repackage” their poison with a better-sounding name to fool people into buying the same old rot. Incidentally, “progressivism” is really a regressive ideology, one centered around the old-world regressive idea that elites can run your life better than you can, the pre-American idea that the average person doesn’t need and shouldn’t have too much freedom.

    Is it clear now why, in the “mainstream” media, we never hear mention of “liberal” policies or “liberal” politicians. There are no liberals, in their liberal minds. In the minds of the “mainstream” media, there are only evil conservatives (which interestingly, still comes in at a very popular 62% despite decades of relentless and non-stop slander and demonization by the “mainstream” media and other elites), and “moderates” (another rehabilitative name for “liberal”).

    ---

    http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/12/progressive-label-rehabilitates-the-same-old-liberal-poison/

    :eusa_shifty:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,902
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +3,248
    Mazzaglia: The history of liberal thought

    6/3/12 By Frank Mazzaglia

    Catholic Liberals might be surprised to learn that their liberalism is rooted in the Anti-Catholicism of the 19th century which delighted in persecuting their own parents and grandparents.

    ---

    More virulent surges of anti-Catholic sentiment in the 1860s and 1870s emerged from Liberal anti-Christians in new forms. An 1866 meeting of Unitarians in Syracuse, N.Y. resulted in a non-Christian group splintering off to form the “Free Religious Association.” The Association’s newspaper, “Index,” founded by Francis Ellinwood Abbot, became popular with atheists, materialists, transcendentalists, spiritualists, and positivists. Abbot’s stated goal was to “replace…a system of dogmas by a system of elastic principles and thus to create intellectual and spiritual unity in the mind of the age.” That drew supporters like Wendell Phillips, William Lloyd Garrison, and Charles Darwin who agreed that the best place to start was in complete separation of church and state. Known as “secularists” or “Liberals,” they demanded a secular version of separation of church and state not just from Catholicism but from all other churches as well.

    Abbot realized that the First Amendment needed to be more restrictive. So, to differentiate themselves from Protestant and Unitarian theologically liberal groups, Abbot founded the “National Liberation League” in 1873 which proposed a far more restrictive Amendment that guaranteed complete Separation of Church and State. Liberals now demanded the discontinuance of public money for military chaplains; the end of bible usage in the public schools for any reason; discontinuance of all religious feasts and fasts (like Christmas); the end of judicial oaths in the courts; and passage of a civil law to transform Sunday into a normal work day.



    Read more: Mazzaglia: The history of liberal thought - Dedham, Massachusetts - The Dedham Transcript Mazzaglia: The history of liberal thought - Framingham, MA - The MetroWest Daily News
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2012
  6. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    …that has a ring to it.

    The OP is clearly a liberal troll.
     
  7. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,902
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +3,248
    The Left’s Culture War Against Conservatives

    June 4, 2012 by David L. Goetsch

    The battles that have been waged for decades over public school curriculums and academic freedom on college campuses are not just about education. In fact, education is just a side issue. Rather, they are battles in a much larger war being conducted against conservatives by the American left. One of the most effective battlegrounds of the left has been the college campus. It is a widely-acknowledged fact that the majority (70 + percent) of college professors identify themselves as being liberal or very liberal. In fact, for a college professor to be viewed as a liberal is a badge of honor. For college professors to be conservative makes them not just rare but unwelcome on college campuses.

    College professors are smart people, although they are not necessarily wise. Consequently, liberal professors have become quite adept at using their numerical and positional advantages to suppress thinking that violates leftist orthodoxy. Ironically, the tactics they use to conduct their on-going culture war violate the very principles liberals claim to believe in and live by. They also violate the principles of free speech, free thought, and free inquiry supposedly protected by academic freedom, the philosophical cornerstone of higher education in America.

    In an article entitled “Diversity Dishonesty on College Campuses,” Phyllis Schlafly wrote: “Diversity, multiculturalism, tolerance, and political correctness are the watchwords in colleges and universities today. The campus thought police have defined those words to enforce the liberal leftwing agenda. Diversity means diversity only for thoughts and practices that are politically correct. Political correctness means conformity to leftwing orthodoxy. Multiculturalism means all cultures are equal but Western Judeo-Christian civilization is the worst. Tolerance means acceptance of all behaviors except those that comport with the Ten Commandments.”
    ---

    Read More:
    The Left
     
  8. francoHFW
    Offline

    francoHFW Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    33,392
    Thanks Received:
    2,173
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Location:
    NY 26th FINALLY DEM!
    Ratings:
    +5,585
    From the world perspective, the Dems are cemter right. Vermont is well educated.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,902
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +3,248
    I thought you were going to Greece, on the way there maybe you can stay at a Holiday Inn...

    [​IMG]

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgX7i0C-IK4]Rodeo Clown Commercial - YouTube[/ame]​
     
  10. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    cuckoo alert!
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

frank mazzaglia multiculturalism

,

why are liberals so oblivious to their own parties cheating and total dishonesty