Professor wants to reduce human population by ‘controlling human fertility’

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Mar 16, 2010
59,455
6,792
1,900
The Good insane United states of America
Professor wants to reduce human population by ‘controlling human fertility’
Campus Reform ^

Professor wants to reduce human population by

A professor at the University of California recently gave a middle school presentation in which he claimed the earth has “too many people” and proposed a reduction of the population through “vegetarianism” and “controlling human fertility.”

Professor Richard Cardullo, a professor of biology at the University of California – Riverside (UCR), told a group of seventh grade students that the environment’s well-being was in jeopardy “if we don’t do anything about population.”

“If we want to decrease our population, we can do it through any number of ways,” he said.

Most of the energy needs to be focused on areas that have a population rate of 4-7 children per family. Middle east, Africa and central Asia.

We need to do this by giving these people books and education. Making them not want to have 10 children apiece. Right? It really doesn't make sense to focus on area's that are having 1-2 children a piece as you're just destroying the educated area's anyways.
 
There are not "too many people," and in about 50 years the global population will begin to decline anyway.
 
Professor wants to reduce human population by ‘controlling human fertility’
Campus Reform ^

Professor wants to reduce human population by

A professor at the University of California recently gave a middle school presentation in which he claimed the earth has “too many people” and proposed a reduction of the population through “vegetarianism” and “controlling human fertility.”

Professor Richard Cardullo, a professor of biology at the University of California – Riverside (UCR), told a group of seventh grade students that the environment’s well-being was in jeopardy “if we don’t do anything about population.”

“If we want to decrease our population, we can do it through any number of ways,” he said.

Most of the energy needs to be focused on areas that have a population rate of 4-7 children per family. Middle east, Africa and central Asia.

We need to do this by giving these people books and education. Making them not want to have 10 children apiece. Right? It really doesn't make sense to focus on area's that are having 1-2 children a piece as you're just destroying the educated area's anyways.

he should start with you
 
There are not "too many people," and in about 50 years the global population will begin to decline anyway.

Yes, there are too many people. The chief cause of the intensive pollution of our environment is the sheer number of people. A few more weather related disasters in the bread baskets of the world, and there are going to be hundreds of millions of people starving. In a world of 7 billion people with some unstable nations possessing nukes, that is most definately not a good thing.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Professor wants to reduce human population by ‘controlling human fertility’
Campus Reform ^

Professor wants to reduce human population by

A professor at the University of California recently gave a middle school presentation in which he claimed the earth has “too many people” and proposed a reduction of the population through “vegetarianism” and “controlling human fertility.”

Professor Richard Cardullo, a professor of biology at the University of California – Riverside (UCR), told a group of seventh grade students that the environment’s well-being was in jeopardy “if we don’t do anything about population.”

“If we want to decrease our population, we can do it through any number of ways,” he said.

Most of the energy needs to be focused on areas that have a population rate of 4-7 children per family. Middle east, Africa and central Asia.

We need to do this by giving these people books and education. Making them not want to have 10 children apiece. Right? It really doesn't make sense to focus on area's that are having 1-2 children a piece as you're just destroying the educated area's anyways.

he should start with you

Should start with you first. Don't want nasty little things like you running around. Don't we?:eusa_whistle:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Who is we? I would donate to a charity that helps teach contraception, and provides free sterilization to the impoverish in foreign nations, but I would reject any notion that world population issues are a United States issue.

Who said the United states has to do a thing? I just said the way I believe it should be done if it was to be done.
 
Professor wants to reduce human population by ‘controlling human fertility’
Campus Reform ^

Professor wants to reduce human population by



Most of the energy needs to be focused on areas that have a population rate of 4-7 children per family. Middle east, Africa and central Asia.

We need to do this by giving these people books and education. Making them not want to have 10 children apiece. Right? It really doesn't make sense to focus on area's that are having 1-2 children a piece as you're just destroying the educated area's anyways.

he should start with you

Should start with you first. Don't want nasty little things like you running around. Don't we?:eusa_whistle:

too late

is english your second language?
 
40 years ago I was being taught that the world population was too large to support, and the world population has about doubled since then.
I wonder if it is the same idiot professor or just one of his idiot progeny?
Just for kicks and grins, we had global cooling and an impending ice age back then also. :)
 
40 years ago I was being taught that the world population was too large to support, and the world population has about doubled since then.
I wonder if it is the same idiot professor or just one of his idiot progeny?
Just for kicks and grins, we had global cooling and an impending ice age back then also. :)
Did they tell you 40 years ago it would be happening now? Most professors look to a crisis around 2100, as, if humans keep increasing at the current rate there will be an excess of 10 billion people by then.
 
larger population necessarily means more energy consumption. whether population control is a realistic means to curb energy usage is yet to be seen
 

Forum List

Back
Top