Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I propose that the death penalty is appropriate for influential GW deniers.
Resistance is useless!
You will be assimilated or you will be killed.
So, we'll just put you in the "Would Prefer to Murder Dissenters" column.The eternal-victims of the right are all at it again, carrying on with their endless quest to cherrypick a reason to proclaim themselves to be the most pathetic victims in all of human history.
This is another reason why the USA and the world now rejects the right-wing political cult -- no one wants to associated with such a bunch of gutless things. Denialist cultists can't rationally discuss the science, and they know it. Thus, they like to deflect by blubbering like little bitches about how some liberal was so meeeeeeaaaaaan to them.
Good luck with that tactic, denialist kooks. And thanks for the votes it sends our way.
I have peer-reviewed this post, and find it to be 100% accurate.As a corollary to Godwin's law, I propose Mamooth's Corollary:
Anyone who calls for the death of those with opposing viewpoints automatically concedes the moral bankruptcy of his belief system.
The eternal-victims of the right are all at it again, carrying on with their endless quest to cherrypick a reason to proclaim themselves to be the most pathetic victims in all of human history.
This is another reason why the USA and the world now rejects the right-wing political cult -- no one wants to associated with such a bunch of gutless things. Denialist cultists can't rationally discuss the science, and they know it. Thus, they like to deflect by blubbering like little bitches about how some liberal was so meeeeeeaaaaaan to them.
Good luck with that tactic, denialist kooks. And thanks for the votes it sends our way.
That's different. Somehow. It just is. Why do you hate science, you science-hater?The eternal-victims of the right are all at it again, carrying on with their endless quest to cherrypick a reason to proclaim themselves to be the most pathetic victims in all of human history.
This is another reason why the USA and the world now rejects the right-wing political cult -- no one wants to associated with such a bunch of gutless things. Denialist cultists can't rationally discuss the science, and they know it. Thus, they like to deflect by blubbering like little bitches about how some liberal was so meeeeeeaaaaaan to them.
Good luck with that tactic, denialist kooks. And thanks for the votes it sends our way.
what was your opinion when the warmists were claiming that they were getting death threats? even though they refused to produce the emails? and when they were forced to produce the emails there wasnt any death threats?
were they just milking popular opinion? was that a worse situation than the real call for the death penalty in this case?
The eternal-victims of the right are all at it again, carrying on with their endless quest to cherrypick a reason to proclaim themselves to be the most pathetic victims in all of human history.
This is another reason why the USA and the world now rejects the right-wing political cult -- no one wants to associated with such a bunch of gutless things. Denialist cultists can't rationally discuss the science, and they know it. Thus, they like to deflect by blubbering like little bitches about how some liberal was so meeeeeeaaaaaan to them.
Good luck with that tactic, denialist kooks. And thanks for the votes it sends our way.
Your high priests have made the claim that they get death threats and when asked to provide the evidence it somehow never materializes. On the other hand we can point to at least five different dipshits on your side who have advocated it.
The eternal-victims of the right are all at it again, carrying on with their endless quest to cherrypick a reason to proclaim themselves to be the most pathetic victims in all of human history.
This is another reason why the USA and the world now rejects the right-wing political cult -- no one wants to associated with such a bunch of gutless things. Denialist cultists can't rationally discuss the science, and they know it. Thus, they like to deflect by blubbering like little bitches about how some liberal was so meeeeeeaaaaaan to them.
Good luck with that tactic, denialist kooks. And thanks for the votes it sends our way.
what was your opinion when the warmists were claiming that they were getting death threats? even though they refused to produce the emails? and when they were forced to produce the emails there wasnt any death threats?
The eternal-victims of the right are all at it again, carrying on with their endless quest to cherrypick a reason to proclaim themselves to be the most pathetic victims in all of human history.
This is another reason why the USA and the world now rejects the right-wing political cult -- no one wants to associated with such a bunch of gutless things. Denialist cultists can't rationally discuss the science, and they know it. Thus, they like to deflect by blubbering like little bitches about how some liberal was so meeeeeeaaaaaan to them.
Good luck with that tactic, denialist kooks. And thanks for the votes it sends our way.
what was your opinion when the warmists were claiming that they were getting death threats? even though they refused to produce the emails? and when they were forced to produce the emails there wasnt any death threats?
Is that the new divorced-from-reality denier cult myth? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......you fruitcakes are sooooooooo gullible.......a quick search turned up dozens of sites with hard evidence of the death threats that ignorant cultists like yourselves have sent to climate scientists for daring to debunk your comfortable myths with facts and scientific evidence.....
Read the Disturbing Death Threats Sent to a Top Climate Scientist
Brian Merchant
Business / Environmental Policy
June 13, 2012
(excerpts)
High-profile climate scientists have notoriously received death threats, especially since the backlash against global warming reached a fever pitch in the wake of so-called ClimateGate. Michael Mann, a climatologist behind the famed 'hockey stick' graph, and Phil Jones, head researcher at the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, have both notably said they're regularly sent some chilling messages. But James Delingpole, perhaps the most vociferous climate change naysayer in the U.K., doesn't believe them. He dedicated a column a while back to calling Jones and company liars, and claims they're exaggerating the hate mail sent their way. Delingpole writes:
Maybe it's time someone did an FOI to see whether the UEA's dodgy and discredited Phil Jones really did get any of those "death threats" he claims to have received after Climategate and which allegedly drove him to consider suicide. Speaking for myself, if Phil Jones released a report claiming that grass is green I'd feel compelled to go outside just to double check ... I've a strong suspicion that the emails I get in my inbox most days from the ecoloons ... are far more foul-mouthed, repellant and poisonous than anything these junk scientists have ever received.
I've a strong suspicion not. Grist reports that Simon Hopkins did indeed file a Freedom of Information request to check into Jones' claims, and sure enoughdeath threats. Dozens of them. Remember, these aren't anonymous YouTube comments or postings on a conservative blog's comment thread. These are direct correspondence emailed to a working scientist, whose only crime is toiling in a field that conservatives have developed a hatred for. They're alternately disturbing, poorly written, outlandish, and genuinely frightening. I just took a few minutes to read through them, and it's pretty chilling stuff - (see site for text of emails). It's important to read these unsettling notes, if only to get an idea of the kind of hatred that's out there for climate scientistsan entire fringe; a clearly unstable contingent of conservatives really feels deeply threatened and outraged by their work. Find the whole nasty trove of them here. As a coda, I'll note that Delingpole himself does all he can to feed this sentiment; it's no wonder his followers seethe with such rage, given the hate-filled, conspiratorial myth-building he engages in his column. A column, I should add, that's based famously on his "interpretation of interpretations"he's admitted he doesn't have time to read any peer-reviewed science himself. Yet he has few qualms [ame="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watermelons-Environmentalists-Destroying-Stealing-Childrens/dp/1849542171"]stoking and encouraging hatred[/ame] towards those who dedicate their lives to actually doing the science.
Australian climate scientists receive death threats
Universities move staff into safer accommodation after a large number of threatening emails and phone calls
The Guardian
Oliver Milman
6 June 2011
(excerpts)
A number of Australia's leading climate scientists have been moved into safer accommodation after receiving death threats, in a further escalation of the country's increasingly febrile carbon price debate. The revelation of the death threats follows a week of bitter exchanges between the government and the opposition in the wake of a pro-carbon price TV advert featuring actor Cate Blanchett. The Australia National University (ANU) in Canberra said that it has moved a number of its climate scientists to a secure facility after they received a large number of threatening emails and phone calls. Ian Young, ANU's vice-chancellor, told ABC national radio that the threats had worsened in recent weeks. Young said that scientists had been threatened with assault if they were identified in the street. Among those targeted is Prof Will Steffen, ANU's climate institute director. Steffen is the co-author of a high-profile Climate Commission report that was published two weeks ago. The report calls for urgent action to avoid sea level rises of a metre or more over the course of the next century.
The death threats have not been confined to the ANU, with universities in New South Wales and Queensland also tightening security for more than 30 ecology, environmental policy and meteorology researchers, according to The Canberra Times. Prof David Koroly, of the University of Melbourne's school of Earth science, told the ABC that he receives threats whenever he is interviewed by the media. "It is clear that there is a campaign in terms of either organised or disorganised threats to discourage scientists from presenting the best available climate science on television or radio," he said.
Yeah, like pursuing criminal complaints against hundreds of different people who authored and sent threatening emails, quite probably anonymously in many cases, is just sooooo easy and cheap, failure to do that has just got to be proof that those scientists are just making it all up. LOLOLOLOL.....still grasping at straws, I see.....you poor nitwit....Yeah, right. Any threat like that is a felony in most countries. Interesting how they have never ever sought to pursue a criminal complaint.what was your opinion when the warmists were claiming that they were getting death threats? even though they refused to produce the emails? and when they were forced to produce the emails there wasnt any death threats?
Is that the new divorced-from-reality denier cult myth? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......you fruitcakes are sooooooooo gullible.......a quick search turned up dozens of sites with hard evidence of the death threats that ignorant cultists like yourselves have sent to climate scientists for daring to debunk your comfortable myths with facts and scientific evidence.....
Read the Disturbing Death Threats Sent to a Top Climate Scientist
Brian Merchant
Business / Environmental Policy
June 13, 2012
(excerpts)
High-profile climate scientists have notoriously received death threats, especially since the backlash against global warming reached a fever pitch in the wake of so-called ClimateGate. Michael Mann, a climatologist behind the famed 'hockey stick' graph, and Phil Jones, head researcher at the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, have both notably said they're regularly sent some chilling messages. But James Delingpole, perhaps the most vociferous climate change naysayer in the U.K., doesn't believe them. He dedicated a column a while back to calling Jones and company liars, and claims they're exaggerating the hate mail sent their way. Delingpole writes:
Maybe it's time someone did an FOI to see whether the UEA's dodgy and discredited Phil Jones really did get any of those "death threats" he claims to have received after Climategate and which allegedly drove him to consider suicide. Speaking for myself, if Phil Jones released a report claiming that grass is green I'd feel compelled to go outside just to double check ... I've a strong suspicion that the emails I get in my inbox most days from the ecoloons ... are far more foul-mouthed, repellant and poisonous than anything these junk scientists have ever received.
I've a strong suspicion not. Grist reports that Simon Hopkins did indeed file a Freedom of Information request to check into Jones' claims, and sure enoughdeath threats. Dozens of them. Remember, these aren't anonymous YouTube comments or postings on a conservative blog's comment thread. These are direct correspondence emailed to a working scientist, whose only crime is toiling in a field that conservatives have developed a hatred for. They're alternately disturbing, poorly written, outlandish, and genuinely frightening. I just took a few minutes to read through them, and it's pretty chilling stuff - (see site for text of emails). It's important to read these unsettling notes, if only to get an idea of the kind of hatred that's out there for climate scientistsan entire fringe; a clearly unstable contingent of conservatives really feels deeply threatened and outraged by their work. Find the whole nasty trove of them here. As a coda, I'll note that Delingpole himself does all he can to feed this sentiment; it's no wonder his followers seethe with such rage, given the hate-filled, conspiratorial myth-building he engages in his column. A column, I should add, that's based famously on his "interpretation of interpretations"he's admitted he doesn't have time to read any peer-reviewed science himself. Yet he has few qualms [ame="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watermelons-Environmentalists-Destroying-Stealing-Childrens/dp/1849542171"]stoking and encouraging hatred[/ame] towards those who dedicate their lives to actually doing the science.
Australian climate scientists receive death threats
Universities move staff into safer accommodation after a large number of threatening emails and phone calls
The Guardian
Oliver Milman
6 June 2011
(excerpts)
A number of Australia's leading climate scientists have been moved into safer accommodation after receiving death threats, in a further escalation of the country's increasingly febrile carbon price debate. The revelation of the death threats follows a week of bitter exchanges between the government and the opposition in the wake of a pro-carbon price TV advert featuring actor Cate Blanchett. The Australia National University (ANU) in Canberra said that it has moved a number of its climate scientists to a secure facility after they received a large number of threatening emails and phone calls. Ian Young, ANU's vice-chancellor, told ABC national radio that the threats had worsened in recent weeks. Young said that scientists had been threatened with assault if they were identified in the street. Among those targeted is Prof Will Steffen, ANU's climate institute director. Steffen is the co-author of a high-profile Climate Commission report that was published two weeks ago. The report calls for urgent action to avoid sea level rises of a metre or more over the course of the next century.
The death threats have not been confined to the ANU, with universities in New South Wales and Queensland also tightening security for more than 30 ecology, environmental policy and meteorology researchers, according to The Canberra Times. Prof David Koroly, of the University of Melbourne's school of Earth science, told the ABC that he receives threats whenever he is interviewed by the media. "It is clear that there is a campaign in terms of either organised or disorganised threats to discourage scientists from presenting the best available climate science on television or radio," he said.
Yeah, that's what people say about all of your posts.Typical BS from the masters of BS.
Yeah, like pursuing criminal complaints against hundreds of different people who authored and sent threatening emails, quite probably anonymously in many cases, is just sooooo easy and cheap, failure to do that has just got to be proof that those scientists are just making it all up. LOLOLOLOL.....still grasping at straws, I see.....you poor nitwit....Yeah, right. Any threat like that is a felony in most countries. Interesting how they have never ever sought to pursue a criminal complaint.Is that the new divorced-from-reality denier cult myth? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......you fruitcakes are sooooooooo gullible.......a quick search turned up dozens of sites with hard evidence of the death threats that ignorant cultists like yourselves have sent to climate scientists for daring to debunk your comfortable myths with facts and scientific evidence.....
Read the Disturbing Death Threats Sent to a Top Climate Scientist
Brian Merchant
Business / Environmental Policy
June 13, 2012
(excerpts)
High-profile climate scientists have notoriously received death threats, especially since the backlash against global warming reached a fever pitch in the wake of so-called ClimateGate. Michael Mann, a climatologist behind the famed 'hockey stick' graph, and Phil Jones, head researcher at the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, have both notably said they're regularly sent some chilling messages. But James Delingpole, perhaps the most vociferous climate change naysayer in the U.K., doesn't believe them. He dedicated a column a while back to calling Jones and company liars, and claims they're exaggerating the hate mail sent their way. Delingpole writes:
Maybe it's time someone did an FOI to see whether the UEA's dodgy and discredited Phil Jones really did get any of those "death threats" he claims to have received after Climategate and which allegedly drove him to consider suicide. Speaking for myself, if Phil Jones released a report claiming that grass is green I'd feel compelled to go outside just to double check ... I've a strong suspicion that the emails I get in my inbox most days from the ecoloons ... are far more foul-mouthed, repellant and poisonous than anything these junk scientists have ever received.
I've a strong suspicion not. Grist reports that Simon Hopkins did indeed file a Freedom of Information request to check into Jones' claims, and sure enoughdeath threats. Dozens of them. Remember, these aren't anonymous YouTube comments or postings on a conservative blog's comment thread. These are direct correspondence emailed to a working scientist, whose only crime is toiling in a field that conservatives have developed a hatred for. They're alternately disturbing, poorly written, outlandish, and genuinely frightening. I just took a few minutes to read through them, and it's pretty chilling stuff - (see site for text of emails). It's important to read these unsettling notes, if only to get an idea of the kind of hatred that's out there for climate scientistsan entire fringe; a clearly unstable contingent of conservatives really feels deeply threatened and outraged by their work. Find the whole nasty trove of them here. As a coda, I'll note that Delingpole himself does all he can to feed this sentiment; it's no wonder his followers seethe with such rage, given the hate-filled, conspiratorial myth-building he engages in his column. A column, I should add, that's based famously on his "interpretation of interpretations"he's admitted he doesn't have time to read any peer-reviewed science himself. Yet he has few qualms stoking and encouraging hatred towards those who dedicate their lives to actually doing the science.
Australian climate scientists receive death threats
Universities move staff into safer accommodation after a large number of threatening emails and phone calls
The Guardian
Oliver Milman
6 June 2011
(excerpts)
A number of Australia's leading climate scientists have been moved into safer accommodation after receiving death threats, in a further escalation of the country's increasingly febrile carbon price debate. The revelation of the death threats follows a week of bitter exchanges between the government and the opposition in the wake of a pro-carbon price TV advert featuring actor Cate Blanchett. The Australia National University (ANU) in Canberra said that it has moved a number of its climate scientists to a secure facility after they received a large number of threatening emails and phone calls. Ian Young, ANU's vice-chancellor, told ABC national radio that the threats had worsened in recent weeks. Young said that scientists had been threatened with assault if they were identified in the street. Among those targeted is Prof Will Steffen, ANU's climate institute director. Steffen is the co-author of a high-profile Climate Commission report that was published two weeks ago. The report calls for urgent action to avoid sea level rises of a metre or more over the course of the next century.
The death threats have not been confined to the ANU, with universities in New South Wales and Queensland also tightening security for more than 30 ecology, environmental policy and meteorology researchers, according to The Canberra Times. Prof David Koroly, of the University of Melbourne's school of Earth science, told the ABC that he receives threats whenever he is interviewed by the media. "It is clear that there is a campaign in terms of either organised or disorganised threats to discourage scientists from presenting the best available climate science on television or radio," he said.
Yeah, that's what people say about all of your posts.Typical BS from the masters of BS.
