Let's ignore the fact that a a pedophile involved prepubescent children and not teenagers. Lets look at the claim that he is a pedophile/child molester. Pedophiles/molesters almost never stop abusing children. They are notorious repeat offenders. So why doesn't Moore fit the profile? Where are the children he molested in the 40 years since the original claims? There are none. Are we expected to honestly believe that Moore is the rare exception to repeat offenders? That he just stopped? Is there any reason to expect more recent accusations to come forward? It's a pretty significant problem to the claim. One of many.