Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And then what? You think China will appreciate the radioactive fall out blowing their way? South Korea too?I answered this above. Of course we could destroy NK. Not the point of the OP. THe point was the striking similarity to a cataclymically incorrect similar prediction years earlier. Never said he was lying just that he eminded me of Khrushchev.Does the OP honestly believe the US couldn't destroy North Korea? The only empty threats out there, are being made by the deranged North Korean leader. Trump could erase North Korea at the drop of a hat. And don't be surprised if it happens.
Trump can actually back up his threat to North Korea. It can be done. And done pretty quickly.
It is actually painful to watch the naked emperor read from a teleprompter.
I don't think he even practiced the speech that was written for him. He mispronounced words, read in a third grader's monotone, and generally embarrassed the US with his amateurish performance.
Name some of them.It is actually painful to watch the naked emperor read from a teleprompter.
I don't think he even practiced the speech that was written for him. He mispronounced words, read in a third grader's monotone, and generally embarrassed the US with his amateurish performance.
Liberals here will and do support N. Korea over the United States.
None of Un's predecessors have been nearly as belligerent as Un. He is asking for military action.Three generations of Kim's have been in power. They are fungible.How long has Un been in power? How many U.S. presidents has he been playing his chicken game with?Yes it was all Obamas fault. No other President ever adopted. Policy of "wait Kim out." It was only Obama.
Not one of the liberals I've talked to support North Korea over the United States. Would you be kind enough to provide cites and or examples. It seems like an extreme position even for LWNJs.It is actually painful to watch the naked emperor read from a teleprompter.
I don't think he even practiced the speech that was written for him. He mispronounced words, read in a third grader's monotone, and generally embarrassed the US with his amateurish performance.
Liberals here will and do support N. Korea over the United States.
I disagree.None of Un's predecessors have been nearly as belligerent as Un. He is asking for military action.Three generations of Kim's have been in power. They are fungible.How long has Un been in power? How many U.S. presidents has he been playing his chicken game with?Yes it was all Obamas fault. No other President ever adopted. Policy of "wait Kim out." It was only Obama.
Oh man, youve got it all figured out. I sure hope the South Koreans dont find out they are our disposable puppets.Im going to have to disagree with you. South korean losses aren't acceptable; in fact, they are the ONLY reason NK isn't being bombed into oblivion right now.That's where we disagree I think. "No real threat to the Us" militarily to be sure. But a proactive strike with nukes would kill us geopolitically for a century. And the "some pain" in North Korea could be a million casualties. If America is to be great again we can't give up our moral leadership blithely. Maybe I'm biased because my first girlfriend in high school was Korean...No they weren't empty really. He was stating what to him was a Marxist truth. If you've read Marx extensively I'm sure you understand.
Well, he did back down in the end. He knew he couldn't destroy the US without destroying his own nation in the process. That isn't the case with North Korea. The US could take Kim Jong-un out right now, with no real threat to the US. South Korea could definitely feel some pain, but the US wouldn't.
I hear ya, but North Korea just doesn't possess the capabilities to seriously challenge the US. It would be taken out pretty quickly. However, South Korea would likely suffer some very serious losses. But the US only uses the country as a Chess piece.
So, any South Korean losses are 'acceptable losses' as far as the US is concerned. Remember, it's a geopolitical Chess Match in the end. Several thousand South Koreans slaughtered, wouldn't bother the US very much. Life would go on. The Chess Match would go on. It's what Empire is all about.
The US Government cares about the US Government only. What it decides on North Korea, will have nothing to do with South Korea. The US merely uses South Korea as a Chess Piece in the grand geopolitical Chess Match. South Korea is a US Puppet. It is what it is.
Hope it works out better for President Trump than it did for Nikita. He ended up being seen, historically, as a clown. A clown subjected to a purge.It needed to be said. Now to blow their ass up.
Do you deny that we have the military capability to turn NK into a huge wasteland if they actually attacked us?
Seems to me that Trump was merely telling the truth.
Hope it works out better for President Trump than it did for Nikita. He ended up being seen, historically, as a clown. A clown subjected to a purge.It needed to be said. Now to blow their ass up.
Un grew accustomed to being patronized by Obama. But this level of provocative challenge is an opportunity for the CIA to covertly promote his assassination. There must be more than one person close to Un who isn't fanatically loyal and/or nuts, who has a family he loves and wishes to protect, and who is willing to make a bold move to seize power.
My gut-feeling is, China and the US will work out some sort of deal to take the North Korean leader out. I don't believe Mr. Un is long for this world. That's my take anyway. Stay tuned.
Oh man, youve got it all figured out. I sure hope the South Koreans dont find out they are our disposable puppets.Im going to have to disagree with you. South korean losses aren't acceptable; in fact, they are the ONLY reason NK isn't being bombed into oblivion right now.That's where we disagree I think. "No real threat to the Us" militarily to be sure. But a proactive strike with nukes would kill us geopolitically for a century. And the "some pain" in North Korea could be a million casualties. If America is to be great again we can't give up our moral leadership blithely. Maybe I'm biased because my first girlfriend in high school was Korean...Well, he did back down in the end. He knew he couldn't destroy the US without destroying his own nation in the process. That isn't the case with North Korea. The US could take Kim Jong-un out right now, with no real threat to the US. South Korea could definitely feel some pain, but the US wouldn't.
I hear ya, but North Korea just doesn't possess the capabilities to seriously challenge the US. It would be taken out pretty quickly. However, South Korea would likely suffer some very serious losses. But the US only uses the country as a Chess piece.
So, any South Korean losses are 'acceptable losses' as far as the US is concerned. Remember, it's a geopolitical Chess Match in the end. Several thousand South Koreans slaughtered, wouldn't bother the US very much. Life would go on. The Chess Match would go on. It's what Empire is all about.
The US Government cares about the US Government only. What it decides on North Korea, will have nothing to do with South Korea. The US merely uses South Korea as a Chess Piece in the grand geopolitical Chess Match. South Korea is a US Puppet. It is what it is.
Crazy talk is never convincing.
Yeah, uhuh, im sure thats going to happen. That sounds like a super realistic scenario.Oh man, youve got it all figured out. I sure hope the South Koreans dont find out they are our disposable puppets.Im going to have to disagree with you. South korean losses aren't acceptable; in fact, they are the ONLY reason NK isn't being bombed into oblivion right now.That's where we disagree I think. "No real threat to the Us" militarily to be sure. But a proactive strike with nukes would kill us geopolitically for a century. And the "some pain" in North Korea could be a million casualties. If America is to be great again we can't give up our moral leadership blithely. Maybe I'm biased because my first girlfriend in high school was Korean...
I hear ya, but North Korea just doesn't possess the capabilities to seriously challenge the US. It would be taken out pretty quickly. However, South Korea would likely suffer some very serious losses. But the US only uses the country as a Chess piece.
So, any South Korean losses are 'acceptable losses' as far as the US is concerned. Remember, it's a geopolitical Chess Match in the end. Several thousand South Koreans slaughtered, wouldn't bother the US very much. Life would go on. The Chess Match would go on. It's what Empire is all about.
The US Government cares about the US Government only. What it decides on North Korea, will have nothing to do with South Korea. The US merely uses South Korea as a Chess Piece in the grand geopolitical Chess Match. South Korea is a US Puppet. It is what it is.
Crazy talk is never convincing.
They are US Puppets. And if they ever do figure that out, the US will declare them 'Evil' and destroy them too. It's what 'Empire' is all about.
Hope it works out better for President Trump than it did for Nikita. He ended up being seen, historically, as a clown. A clown subjected to a purge.It needed to be said. Now to blow their ass up.
Do you deny that we have the military capability to turn NK into a huge wasteland if they actually attacked us?
Seems to me that Trump was merely telling the truth.
How many times has he said it now? Maybe it is time to shit or get off the pot. Bullshit and bluster mean nothing!
Hope it works out better for President Trump than it did for Nikita. He ended up being seen, historically, as a clown. A clown subjected to a purge.It needed to be said. Now to blow their ass up.
Do you deny that we have the military capability to turn NK into a huge wasteland if they actually attacked us?
Seems to me that Trump was merely telling the truth.
How many times has he said it now? Maybe it is time to shit or get off the pot. Bullshit and bluster mean nothing!
You've got to pave the road before you can drive on it.
The Donald did just that. He told the UN, what we will do. The UN
was created to prevent war. To prevent maniacs starting full scale
blood baths. The UN does nothing.
The UN has evolved into the International Junior Woman's Club. They
sit around, drinking coffee and bullshitting about others and do nothing.
That crap has to cease. They need to get back to doing what they were
formed to do. The Donald has put the world on notice. You help us or
we will light up their atmosphere if they launch on an American possession
or Ally.
As for the poster(s) who replied earlier that the Chinese will come to
NK's aid...BULLSHIT! First, there will be no NK to aid and second, and
most important, China nor Russia is gonna give up their Countries for
that fatass. Granted, I can hear all the whining now from China,
Russia, the rest of the World and the Dems but all of them were warned
what we would do. BUT...they know, like you know and I know that there is
nothing they can do about it. We have an inherent right to defend ourselves
and we'll do just that. We're not Peru or Ghana. Those folks could be
wiped out tomorrow and while the world would mourn, life would go on.
People fuck with us and we can end life on the planet.
Not in China's interest to do so.
The Parasites' Patsy, the Ferals' Fairy, the You're-a-Peein' Union's UrinalThat's where we disagree I think. "No real threat to the Us" militarily to be sure. But a proactive strike with nukes would kill us geopolitically for a century. And the "some pain" in North Korea could be a million casualties. If America is to be great again we can't give up our moral leadership blithely. Maybe I'm biased because my first girlfriend in high school was Korean...No they weren't empty really. He was stating what to him was a Marxist truth. If you've read Marx extensively I'm sure you understand.Do you wear shoes? Hitler did too. You and Hitler are similar people.I answered this above. Of course we could destroy NK. Not the point of the OP. THe point was the striking similarity to a cataclymically incorrect similar prediction years earlier. Never said he was lying just that he eminded me of Khrushchev.
Do you see how fucking stupid this comparison thing is?
Yes, Khrushchev's threats were empty. He couldn't have destroyed the US without destroying his own country in the process. But Trump's threats are definitely not 'empty.' If i were Kim Jong-un, i would be very worried. His time could be up.
Well, he did back down in the end. He knew he couldn't destroy the US without destroying his own nation in the process. That isn't the case with North Korea. The US could take Kim Jong-un out right now, with no real threat to the US. South Korea could definitely feel some pain, but the US wouldn't.
