President Romney in 2012?

[SwingVoter]

In 1992, 22 states that voted for Bush in 88 went for Clinton. In 2008, just 9 states that voted for Bush in 04 went for Obama.

I don't see Barry winning again in VA, NC, or Indiana at a minimum plus McCain states like Texas will have a net gain of electoral votes in 2012 over 2008 due to Census adjustments. That's about 45 EVs right there, getting Barry down to 320. Even with a better economy, this thing will be tight.

I'll bet anything Romney's gonna be the GOP nominee in 2012. If Barry can't hold just 6 states - three above + FL + OH + one other, he'll be gone.

 

[uscitizen]

It's a long time till 2012 in Ameria.
That seems to be longer than the average voting American remembers.

Besides the world ends that year anyway.

 

[jillian]

lol...the religious right isn't voting for romney... or he'd have had the nomination this time around. didn't they say he wasn't christian enough.? and the rest of the party called him a RINO.

 

[SwingVoter]

lol...the religious right isn't voting for romney... .

they didn't like mccain either

but if you go back to every GOP nominee to Reagan, they all lost a primary before they won, Reagan 76, HW Bush 80, Dole 88, McCain 2000, GW Bush didn't but had unusual name recognition

this happens because of how they dish out delegates all or nothing, if Dems did it the same way, Hillary would have been their 08 nominee, and it would have wrapped up much sooner than it did

Dems are the opposite of GOP in that their system favors newcomers, only Gore won 2nd time around, and that was because he was sitting VP, Obama, Kerry, Clinton, Dukakis, Mondale, Carter, McGovern - all won 1st time they sought nomination, and none of the losers ever made it - Gephardt, Bradley, Cuomo, Hart, Harkin, Ted Kennedy, Jerry Brown - not one was able to turn around a competitive 1st time run into a 2nd time nomination

like McCain, Dole, Bush, Reagan, Romney is the 08 loser ready to win the nominee in 2012, regardless of his particularly ideology, not saying he's a shoo-in to beat Obama, but they'd have to find him having gay sex with an underage prostitute for him not to win the GOP nomination

interesting though that just 9 of 50 states voted differently between 2004 and 2008, and the GOP had a really bad run those 4 years, wouldn't be surprised if just 5-6 flip this time

 

[VaYank5150]

In 1992, 22 states that voted for Bush in 88 went for Clinton. In 2008, just 9 states that voted for Bush in 04 went for Obama.

I don't see Barry winning again in VA, NC, or Indiana at a minimum plus McCain states like Texas will have a net gain of electoral votes in 2012 over 2008 due to Census adjustments. That's about 45 EVs right there, getting Barry down to 320. Even with a better economy, this thing will be tight.

I'll bet anything Romney's gonna be the GOP nominee in 2012. If Barry can't hold just 6 states - three above + FL + OH + one other, he'll be gone.

Oh please....Romney was the best candidate the GOP had in 2008, but since he is a Mormon, the "base" of the GOP would not allow him to be the nominee. From what I have seen, that "base" is all that remains of the GOP, and therefore Romney has no chance for the ballot in 2012, either.

 

[SwingVoter]

but since he is a Mormon, the "base" of the GOP would not allow him to be the nominee..

doubt that, they're going cuckoo for cocoa puffs over Marco Rubio, and he's Catholic

 

[Douger]

In 1992, 22 states that voted for Bush in 88 went for Clinton. In 2008, just 9 states that voted for Bush in 04 went for Obama.

I don't see Barry winning again in VA, NC, or Indiana at a minimum plus McCain states like Texas will have a net gain of electoral votes in 2012 over 2008 due to Census adjustments. That's about 45 EVs right there, getting Barry down to 320. Even with a better economy, this thing will be tight.

I'll bet anything Romney's gonna be the GOP nominee in 2012. If Barry can't hold just 6 states - three above + FL + OH + one other, he'll be gone.

Oh please....Romney was the best candidate the GOP had in 2008, but since he is a Mormon, the "base" of the GOP would not allow him to be the nominee. From what I have seen, that "base" is all that remains of the GOP, and therefore Romney has no chance for the ballot in 2012, either.

He could convert to Satanism at the next Bohemian grove.
That's a shoe in !

 

[elvis]

In 1992, 22 states that voted for Bush in 88 went for Clinton. In 2008, just 9 states that voted for Bush in 04 went for Obama.

I don't see Barry winning again in VA, NC, or Indiana at a minimum plus McCain states like Texas will have a net gain of electoral votes in 2012 over 2008 due to Census adjustments. That's about 45 EVs right there, getting Barry down to 320. Even with a better economy, this thing will be tight.

I'll bet anything Romney's gonna be the GOP nominee in 2012. If Barry can't hold just 6 states - three above + FL + OH + one other, he'll be gone.

Oh please....Romney was the best candidate the GOP had in 2008, but since he is a Mormon, the "base" of the GOP would not allow him to be the nominee. From what I have seen, that "base" is all that remains of the GOP, and therefore Romney has no chance for the ballot in 2012, either.

He could convert to Satanism at the next Bohemian grove.
That's a shoe in !

shoo-in.

 

[Luissa]

Romney would be a mistake for the GOP, so I say nominate him along with Palin as his running mate.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The way O's numbers continue to tank, he may not even be the dem nominee.

 

[elvis]

The way O's numbers continue to tank, he may not even be the dem nominee.

That's my dream.

 

[VaYank5150]

The way O's numbers continue to tank, he may not even be the dem nominee.

Of course, Obama's numbers are still better than that of the Republicans, but just keep your head up your ass, since you seem to enjoy it so much...

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The way O's numbers continue to tank, he may not even be the dem nominee.

Of course, Obama's numbers are still better than that of the Republicans, but just keep your head up your ass, since you seem to enjoy it so much...

Your statement says nothing at all other than we are reaching new levels of ineptitude as a nation. Also, I didn't mention the republicans either.

 

[JWBooth]

President Romney in 2012?

Gosh no. You'd think that, given the really crappy quality of leadership in the White House for the last hundred and fifty years that we'd want to raise the bar some, not continue to reward complete mediocrity.

 

[VaYank5150]

The way O's numbers continue to tank, he may not even be the dem nominee.

Of course, Obama's numbers are still better than that of the Republicans, but just keep your head up your ass, since you seem to enjoy it so much...

Your statement says nothing at all other than we are reaching new levels of ineptitude as a nation. Also, I didn't mention the republicans either.

No you didn't....even though this is a thread about the REPUBLICAN nominee in 2012, so why did you bring up Obama in the first place?

 

[Wicked Jester]

Of course, Obama's numbers are still better than that of the Republicans, but just keep your head up your ass, since you seem to enjoy it so much...

Your statement says nothing at all other than we are reaching new levels of ineptitude as a nation. Also, I didn't mention the republicans either.

No you didn't....even though this is a thread about the REPUBLICAN nominee in 2012, so why did you bring up Obama in the first place?

Because that is who is going to get trounced in '12.

If not by a republican, then it will be someone in his own party who gets the nomination.

Notice how Hillary has been keeping her mouth shut, and keeping a low profile. Didn't even attend his SOTU, or offer an opinion on it afterward.

 

[VaYank5150]

Your statement says nothing at all other than we are reaching new levels of ineptitude as a nation. Also, I didn't mention the republicans either.

No you didn't....even though this is a thread about the REPUBLICAN nominee in 2012, so why did you bring up Obama in the first place?

Because that is who is going to get trounced in '12.

If not by a republican, then it will be someone in his own party who gets the nomination.

Notice how Hillary has been keeping her mouth shut, and keeping a low profile. Didn't even attend his SOTU, or offer an opinion on it afterward.

Hillary was overseas, DOING HER JOB. However, she did give an interview while over there where she answered such silly questions as your own. Please try to do your homework BEFORE talking out of your ass. It only benefits you...

 

[Wicked Jester]

No you didn't....even though this is a thread about the REPUBLICAN nominee in 2012, so why did you bring up Obama in the first place?

Because that is who is going to get trounced in '12.

If not by a republican, then it will be someone in his own party who gets the nomination.

Notice how Hillary has been keeping her mouth shut, and keeping a low profile. Didn't even attend his SOTU, or offer an opinion on it afterward.

Hillary was overseas, DOING HER JOB. However, she did give an interview while over there where she answered such silly questions as your own. Please try to do your homework BEFORE talking out of your ass. It only benefits you...

Hillary could have gotten her fat stupid liberal ass on a plane and made a quick trip back to support that clown during his first state of the union.
You know damn good and well they hate each other. She will stab him in the back and run.

Whoever it is, Obama will be packing his corrupt, and incredibly inept ass back to Chicago in a lil' more than two years.

BTW:
Where's the transparency he promised you gullible clowns?
Where's CSPAN?
Where is Healthcare?
Where is the deficit?
Where are the jobs?
Where is wall street stability?
Where is investor confidence?
What happened to Gitmo?
We're still in Iraq.
Where did all those small businesses go?
What happened to the Olympics?
What happened in Copenhagen?
What happened in Massachussets?
Where's those ready shovels?
What happened in New Jersey?
What happened to the terror trials?
Why did he throw our childrens futures down the tubes?
How could you have been so stupid as to vote for the junior senator and anti-american racist piece of shit?

LMAO!

Christ, liberals are fucking idiots!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

In 1992, 22 states that voted for Bush in 88 went for Clinton. In 2008, just 9 states that voted for Bush in 04 went for Obama.

I don't see Barry winning again in VA, NC, or Indiana at a minimum plus McCain states like Texas will have a net gain of electoral votes in 2012 over 2008 due to Census adjustments. That's about 45 EVs right there, getting Barry down to 320. Even with a better economy, this thing will be tight.

I'll bet anything Romney's gonna be the GOP nominee in 2012. If Barry can't hold just 6 states - three above + FL + OH + one other, he'll be gone.

Romney is a socialist. He is responsible for a socialist Obama/Democrat like health care plan in Massachusetts.

 

[xsited1]

In 1992, 22 states that voted for Bush in 88 went for Clinton. In 2008, just 9 states that voted for Bush in 04 went for Obama.

I don't see Barry winning again in VA, NC, or Indiana at a minimum plus McCain states like Texas will have a net gain of electoral votes in 2012 over 2008 due to Census adjustments. That's about 45 EVs right there, getting Barry down to 320. Even with a better economy, this thing will be tight.

I'll bet anything Romney's gonna be the GOP nominee in 2012. If Barry can't hold just 6 states - three above + FL + OH + one other, he'll be gone.

You could be right. If Romney is the GOP nominee for 2012 and if Obama 'stays the course', Americans will elect anyone but Obama (or Hillary).