President Obama to fix No Child left Behind

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Aug 4, 2009
280,589
139,005
2,300
Obama promise: Brighter education futures for kids - Yahoo! News

ATLANTA – President Barack Obama is promising parents and their kids that with his administration's help they will have better teachers in improved schools so U.S. students can make up for academic ground lost against youngsters in other countries.

A plan to overhaul the 2002 education law championed by President George W. Bush was unveiled by the Obama administration Saturday in hopes of replacing a system that in the last decade has tagged more than a third of schools as failing and created a hodgepodge of sometimes weak academic standards among states.

In the proposed dismantling of the No Child Left Behind law, education officials would move away from punishing schools that don't meet benchmarks and focus on rewarding schools for progress, particularly with poor and minority students. Obama intends to send a rewrite to Congress on Monday of the law.

The proposed changes call for states to adopt standards that ensure students are ready for college or a career rather than grade-level proficiency — the focus of the current law.

The blueprint also would allow states to use subjects other than reading and mathematics as part of their measurements for meeting federal goals, pleasing many education groups that have said No Child Left Behind encouraged teachers not to focus on history, art, science, social studies and other important subjects.

A few other highlights from the blueprint:

• By 2020, all students graduating from high school would need to be ready for college or a career. That's a shift away from the current law, which calls for all students to be performing at grade level in reading and math by 2014.

• Give more rewards — money and flexibility — to high-poverty schools that are seeing big gains in student achievement and use them as a model for other schools in low-income neighborhoods that struggle with performance.

• Punish the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools using aggressive measures, such as having the state take over federal funding for poor students, replacing the principal and half the teaching staff or closing the school altogether.

• Duncan has said the name No Child Left Behind will be dropped because it is associated with a harsh law that punishes schools for not reaching benchmarks even if they've made big gains. He said the administration will work with Congress to come up with a new name.
 
Last edited:
Obama promise: Brighter education futures for kids - Yahoo! News

ATLANTA – President Barack Obama is promising parents and their kids that with his administration's help they will have better teachers in improved schools so U.S. students can make up for academic ground lost against youngsters in other countries.

A plan to overhaul the 2002 education law championed by President George W. Bush was unveiled by the Obama administration Saturday in hopes of replacing a system that in the last decade has tagged more than a third of schools as failing and created a hodgepodge of sometimes weak academic standards among states.

In the proposed dismantling of the No Child Left Behind law, education officials would move away from punishing schools that don't meet benchmarks and focus on rewarding schools for progress, particularly with poor and minority students. Obama intends to send a rewrite to Congress on Monday of the law.

The proposed changes call for states to adopt standards that ensure students are ready for college or a career rather than grade-level proficiency — the focus of the current law.

The blueprint also would allow states to use subjects other than reading and mathematics as part of their measurements for meeting federal goals, pleasing many education groups that have said No Child Left Behind encouraged teachers not to focus on history, art, science, social studies and other important subjects.

A few other highlights from the blueprint:

• By 2020, all students graduating from high school would need to be ready for college or a career. That's a shift away from the current law, which calls for all students to be performing at grade level in reading and math by 2014.

• Give more rewards — money and flexibility — to high-poverty schools that are seeing big gains in student achievement and use them as a model for other schools in low-income neighborhoods that struggle with performance.

• Punish the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools using aggressive measures, such as having the state take over federal funding for poor students, replacing the principal and half the teaching staff or closing the school altogether.

• Duncan has said the name No Child Left Behind will be dropped because it is associated with a harsh law that punishes schools for not reaching benchmarks even if they've made big gains. He said the administration will work with Congress to come up with a new name.

This is a big plus for the President.

I have come to realize that he has assumed the wrong office, as he would have been an astounding Sec'y of Education.

I have agreed with "The Race To The Top," and now, the addition of accountability to education policy.

The 'tripod' of education reform should be

1. content-based standards

2. testing and measurement

3. accountability and incentives.

And it seems that the President agrees.
 
My view of educational standards is quite simple

What was the capability of the student you were given and did the student improve or digress at the end of the year.

Schools that are given yuppie bred over achievers and send them to college have not achieved more than schools that are given marginal students and teach them life skills

If you take an A student and continue to give him As, you have not achieved more than if you are given an F student and get him to earn Cs. That is the problem with No Child Left Behind
 
Rod's sis came by yesterday. She heard on the news they are cutting school funding so the schools have decided to take History out of the criteria and keep more art and social behavior classes in.
 
My wife is a teacher here in Atlanta. When she read this she laughed out loud and walked away after saying that its screwed up now but after Obamay gets his hands on it, it will be totally fucked up.

BTW, my wife doesnt cuss and is not political.
 
I just found out what Barry is up too:

My Way News - Dems seek agreement, quick vote on health care

Its a PAYOFF to pass healthcare, they are going to ride this on the Barrycare bill to make it pass!

ANOTHER back room dirty deal!!!

Curses foiled again!

So it looks like after Obama fixes healthcare he is going to fix our education system


Damn! This guy is GOOD
UFT opposes the Barry plan.

Gee, that makes you look like a moronic partisan fool, doesn't it?

Same as usual.
 
It's about time. This is one of the reasons I voted for Obama, because he said he was going to change some of the criteria of NCLB. It is unfair to expect students with IQs from 56 to 80 to perform the same on standardized tests, and punish the student, teacher and the school if they don't pass.

NCLB had a standard that 100% of students would pass standardized tests by 2014. Uh huh, sure.

Also, punishing low poverty schools for not performing up to the same standards as the suburban schools was unfair. Showing improvement is realistic, and I'm glad the law is being changed to reflect this.



This is GREAT news!
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: blu
This will result in even more Social Promotion and kids who can't read receiving diplomas to celebrate their self-esteem.

It's sad.
 
Only after it has already happened.

The history indicates it will be more of the same soft standards designed to improve self-esteem and encourage subjective standards.

What does prepare for college mean?

- Sounds like more of getting the kid into college even when he doesn't have proper academic skills and has low SAT scores. (It's not a coincidence that the government is now making a play to take over student loans for college - this funding will be used to get unqualified kids into college). This soft goal will result in grade inflation and social promotion - it's more of the same Federal Education Policy.

- What does prepare for a career mean? First, define career. Considering the Obama's push to expand government employment (Michelle's harangues to not go into business), this smells a lot like steering kids towards do nothing public employee jobs.

Why is it the high schools job to push the kids towards college or careers? That is a parental responsibility. The kids would be better off learning reading, math, science, and history.
 
Not all kids are cut out for college. That's why vocational options should be available in all high schools for those who choose that path.
 

Forum List

Back
Top