Just about everybody defines Barack Taqiyya’s behavior with one excuse or another; he’s incompetent, he’s weak, he leads from behind, he’s indifferent, he’s in over his head, and so on. It seems that every time he harms the country another excuse for his actions pop up. Well-intentioned critics like Colonel Ralph Peters even excused him by calling him a coward:
The New York Times took excuses for Taqiyya to new heights by trying to protect congressional Democrats in the midterms.
The Times article did come close to how Taqiyya wants to be seen:
From the day Taqiyya the Liar began campaigning for the presidency he tried to establish himself as a spiritual leader; a combination president and ayatollah. Every decision he made as president was designed to establish his spiritual grandeur rather than his ability to protect and govern a free people.
Taqiyya can hardly play the spiritual leader when he orders the US military to kill America’s enemies. The best he can do militarily is turn the other cheek which is what he appears to be doing. That’s why I’m convinced he wants to focus attention on open-borders along with his handling of Ebola. In that way he hopes to be seen as a morally justified man doing the right thing regardless of the havoc he leaves in his wake.
Thomas Sowell comes the closest to nailing Taqiyya without getting it exactly right:
Taqiyya’s disasters were never inexplicable to me. Go back to 2009 and look at the choices he had before he made a final decision if you doubt me. Every one his decisions did the most harm to the country —— and the least harm to his image as a spiritual leader. More importantly, every future decision he will make is as predictable as is tomorrow’s sunrise. Simply ask yourself which decision harms Americans the most?
Everything I’ve suggested so far only scratches the surface. Every pundit and public voice makes excuses for Taqiyya because they refuse to, or cannot, accept the truth. Taqiyya the Liar is a traitor determined to tear America down. If not destroy America completely he will settle for leaving the country in ruins so the next Democrat president with a Democrat Congress can finish the job.
Thomas Sowell touches lightly on my interpretation of Taqiyya.
The New York Times took excuses for Taqiyya to new heights by trying to protect congressional Democrats in the midterms.
" . . . even the slightest injection of the Obama brand into this election seems perilous for Democrats."
The Times article did come close to how Taqiyya wants to be seen:
". . . Democrats no longer on the ballot believe the president should focus his time on his most loyal constituency.
“I’d have Obama on an evangelistic schedule of black churches all over the country,” said Willie Brown, the former mayor of San Francisco. “I think he really should go to the black base. I don’t think there’s any other place I would trust he wouldn’t create an adverse reaction rather than a positive reaction.”
“I’d have Obama on an evangelistic schedule of black churches all over the country,” said Willie Brown, the former mayor of San Francisco. “I think he really should go to the black base. I don’t think there’s any other place I would trust he wouldn’t create an adverse reaction rather than a positive reaction.”
In This Election, Obama’s Party Benches Him
By JONATHAN MARTINOCT. 7, 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/us/politics/in-this-election-obamas-party-benches-him.html
By JONATHAN MARTINOCT. 7, 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/us/politics/in-this-election-obamas-party-benches-him.html
From the day Taqiyya the Liar began campaigning for the presidency he tried to establish himself as a spiritual leader; a combination president and ayatollah. Every decision he made as president was designed to establish his spiritual grandeur rather than his ability to protect and govern a free people.
Taqiyya can hardly play the spiritual leader when he orders the US military to kill America’s enemies. The best he can do militarily is turn the other cheek which is what he appears to be doing. That’s why I’m convinced he wants to focus attention on open-borders along with his handling of Ebola. In that way he hopes to be seen as a morally justified man doing the right thing regardless of the havoc he leaves in his wake.
Thomas Sowell comes the closest to nailing Taqiyya without getting it exactly right:
"In other words, the safety of the American people takes second place to the goal of helping people overseas.
As if to emphasize his priorities, President Obama has ordered thousands of American troops to go into Ebola-stricken Liberia, disregarding the dangers to those troops and to other Americans when the troops return.
What does this say about Obama?
At a minimum, it suggests that he takes his conception of himself as a citizen of the world more seriously than he takes his role as president of the United States. At worst, he may consider Americans’ interests expendable in the grand scheme of things internationally. If so, this would explain a lot of his foreign policy disasters around the world, which seem inexplicable otherwise."
As if to emphasize his priorities, President Obama has ordered thousands of American troops to go into Ebola-stricken Liberia, disregarding the dangers to those troops and to other Americans when the troops return.
What does this say about Obama?
At a minimum, it suggests that he takes his conception of himself as a citizen of the world more seriously than he takes his role as president of the United States. At worst, he may consider Americans’ interests expendable in the grand scheme of things internationally. If so, this would explain a lot of his foreign policy disasters around the world, which seem inexplicable otherwise."
Taqiyya’s disasters were never inexplicable to me. Go back to 2009 and look at the choices he had before he made a final decision if you doubt me. Every one his decisions did the most harm to the country —— and the least harm to his image as a spiritual leader. More importantly, every future decision he will make is as predictable as is tomorrow’s sunrise. Simply ask yourself which decision harms Americans the most?
Everything I’ve suggested so far only scratches the surface. Every pundit and public voice makes excuses for Taqiyya because they refuse to, or cannot, accept the truth. Taqiyya the Liar is a traitor determined to tear America down. If not destroy America completely he will settle for leaving the country in ruins so the next Democrat president with a Democrat Congress can finish the job.
Thomas Sowell touches lightly on my interpretation of Taqiyya.
A few critics who, early on, sensed something un-American, if not anti-American, in Barack Obama succumbed to the idea that he was not a native-born citizen. That claim blew up in their faces.
Nor was birthplace crucial anyway. People born overseas have put their lives on the line to defend America, and scientists who escaped from Europe in the 1930s played a major role in creating the nuclear bomb that made the United States a superpower. Conversely, the country’s most notorious traitor – Benedict Arnold – was born on American soil.
Whatever the reason, or combination of reasons, that led to President Obama’s foreign-policy disasters around the world – with the crowning disaster of all, a nuclear Iran, looming on the horizon – it cannot be a simple lack of knowledge or experience. Various former members of the Obama administration are telling the same story, of information and advice from knowledgeable and experienced officials being ignored by this vain and headstrong man.
Nor was birthplace crucial anyway. People born overseas have put their lives on the line to defend America, and scientists who escaped from Europe in the 1930s played a major role in creating the nuclear bomb that made the United States a superpower. Conversely, the country’s most notorious traitor – Benedict Arnold – was born on American soil.
Whatever the reason, or combination of reasons, that led to President Obama’s foreign-policy disasters around the world – with the crowning disaster of all, a nuclear Iran, looming on the horizon – it cannot be a simple lack of knowledge or experience. Various former members of the Obama administration are telling the same story, of information and advice from knowledgeable and experienced officials being ignored by this vain and headstrong man.
Obama's priority: Not protecting Americans
Thomas Sowell: He takes 'citizen of the world' role more seriously than role as president
Published: 2 days ago
THOMAS SOWELL
Obama 8217 s priority Not protecting Americans
Thomas Sowell: He takes 'citizen of the world' role more seriously than role as president
Published: 2 days ago
THOMAS SOWELL
Obama 8217 s priority Not protecting Americans
Stop the presses!!! This has never been seen before. 
