Preparing To Lie

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
After reading Karin McQuillan’s concise history of the Chicago sewer rat’s disdain for the Constitution it suddenly hit me that he put decades of preparation into the first lie he told as president.

It is fair to say that the “constitutional scholar” makes no pretense of defending the Constitution. Indeed, swearing his oath of office was the first lie he told as president.

The First Lie President Obama Told | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The sewer rat surely knew that if he did make it to the presidency he would have to swear the presidential oath. The lie came easily because he always knew he would lie when the time came so he prepared for it. I’ll wager that he practiced how to say the lie and sound sincere much the way actors rehearse dialogue.

NOTE: It comes as no great revelation that Taqiyya and Kitman would attract an ambitious liar to Islam.

After he told the first lie as president there was nothing standing in his way to tear down the entire Constitution as he has been doing. Getting away with lying every time he opened his mouth came as a gift from a generous Congress, the Supreme Court, and media.

I can understand the party of liars embracing one of their own. I think I even understand the politics governing the Supreme Court, but there is no justification for the media not reporting what the liar was on the day he announced his bid for the White House:


Among the lies about himself Obama consistently repeats is that he was a constitutional law professor.

Lie one: Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer.

XXXXX

Lie two: Obama did not specialize in the Constitution. Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race. One course was about race in the Constitution. It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.

As the New York Times explains, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: "race, rights and gender."

XXXXX

Lie three: Obama calls himself a constitutional law prof to imply that he loves the Constitution. Obama gives the lie to this himself.

January 10, 2016
Here's what 'constitutional scholar' Obama really taught at law school
By Karin McQuillan

Blog: Here's what 'constitutional scholar' Obama really taught at law school

Parenthetically, Hillary Clinton is every bit the liar the president is. She was defined as a congenital liar decades ago, while the public only began to see the depth of the sewer rat’s lies with the Affordable Care Act. In short: Everybody knows it about Clinton before she swears the presidential oath should she lie her way into the White House.

Finally, the lying sack of shit did more than tear up a piece of paper. He abolished every Right that piece of paper guarantees. Put it in perspective by asking yourself one question: How many Rights did open-borders and United Nations refugees steal from me?

You might also ask yourself how many believed what the lecturer said about Rights?
 
Last edited:
He was elected president, twice, in part because America recognizes the lies of the anti-American far right, which Flanders represents.
 
I cannot accept psychiatrist Andrew G. Hodges’ analysis

“Obama’s basic denial – ‘ISIS is not dangerous’ – means he can’t consciously grasp the threat. First, his subconscious admits it has a powerful blind spot about ISIS and must block out its destructiveness. Second, another part of his unconscious – the brilliant super intelligence – teaches us to read through denial to see past that blind spot. This super-intel selects the key images Obama uses in his denials, key images which reveal the truth. Don’t overlook Obama’s image, the big idea he must deny in his own words – ‘ISIS is dangerous.’”

Forensic profiler: Obama accepts ISIS attacks
Posted By Bob Unruh On 01/10/2016 @ 8:18 pm

Forensic profiler: Obama accepts ISIS attacks

Super intelligence my ass. Taqiyya the Liar is no more brilliant than this:
It comes as no great revelation that Taqiyya and Kitman would attract an ambitious liar to Islam.
The unvarnished truth is that the lying sack of shit conscientiously implements his political agenda with every wacky statement he utters about ISIS and every other topic he talks about.

In short: Every salesman that ever lived knew the time to adjust the sales pitch had arrived when the suckers stop buying the product. Our super salesman is no different. He will lie for as long his customer base buys the product.

Dr. Hodges would do the world a service if he diagnosed the sickness afflicting the millions who believe famous liars at the same time they know better than to believe the liars they meet in everyday life. To me, that is the ultimate split personality.

Finally, the salesmen and the suckers never change:


The people always have some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness. . . . This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector. Plato
 
He was elected president, twice, in part because America recognizes the lies of the anti-American far right, which Flanders represents.
While I can't account for Obama's second term, I strongly believe he was elected in '08 as a backlash from Bush -- who was the essence of all that is wrong with White America. This swing from one extreme to the other is not unfamiliar. Voters become so fed up with a personality type they unconsciously reach for the most opposing manifestation.

It is a swinging pendulum, which is why I fear the very real possibility of a Trump Presidency. Of all the right-wing candidates he is the most compellingly opposite of Obama. He is so opposite of Obama he sometimes seems poised on the verge of calling him a n!gger.
 
He is so opposite of Obama he sometimes seems poised on the verge of calling him a n!gger.
To MikeK: Does that make Biden, Clinton, and CROC (Crazy Old Coot Bernie Sanders) white n!ggers?
 
[...]

In short: Every salesman that ever lived knew the time to adjust the sales pitch had arrived when the suckers stop buying the product. Our super salesman is no different. He will lie for as long his customer base buys the product.


[...]
This is an apt analogy. I agree completely. Obama is an artful salesman (AKA bullshit artist.)
 
(And he's not crazy.)
To MikeK: Have you listened the things he is saying? Anybody who wants to spend trillions without knowing where the money is coming from is as crazy as a loony bird. As a matter of fact sanity is a scarce commodity among his staunchest supporters.
 
(And he's not crazy.)
To MikeK: Have you listened the things he is saying? Anybody who wants to spend trillions without knowing where the money is coming from is as crazy as a loony bird. As a matter of fact sanity is a scarce commodity among his staunchest supporters.
The last Presidential candidates who made the same kind of promises were FDR and Eisenhower. But don't ask a typical brainwashed right-wing water-carrier what effect their administrations had on the middle class because they conveniently ignore the 97% tax rate on the super rich and the end to federal patronage of the banks and Wall Street -- and the rise of the Middle Class!

The money is there but it's been misused via the "same ol'" maneuvering by both the Republicans and the Democrats. Bernie is an Independent. He owes nothing to any entity other than the ordinary people who support him. He hasn't taken a dime from the kingmakers.

If you are an ordinary working class individual you will be doing yourself a big favor by voting for Bernie Sanders. But of course you think you'll do better with a One Percenter like Trump or an elitist Bankers' Boy like Cruz.

Don't you?
 
The last Presidential candidates who made the same kind of promises were FDR and Eisenhower.
To Mikek: How do you come up with Eisenhower?
But don't ask a typical brainwashed right-wing water-carrier what effect their administrations had on the middle class because they conveniently ignore the 97% tax rate on the super rich and the end to federal patronage of the banks and Wall Street--and the rise of the Middle Class!
To Mikek: Do not expect others to make your case for you.

I do not get your interpretation of the middle class. Democrats, destroyed the private sector middle class and replaced it with a tax dollar middle class —— the very policy the CROC advocates.

Bernie is an Independent. He owes nothing to any entity other than the ordinary people who support him.
To Mikek: The CROC is a reincarnation of Eugene V. Debs and Norman Thomas except that his support of labor unions is centered on support for government unions that did not exist until JFK.

The CROC’s supporters would do well to look up where the two most famous Socialists finished in 11 presidential elections —— Debs 5 & Thomas 6. Neither one got more than a million votes —— and that was throughout Socialism’s golden years 1900 through 1948.

He hasn't taken a dime from the kingmakers.
To Mikek: That is because they will not give him one.

The CROC is a Socialist sharpshooter funding a war chest he can use to buy influence after he loses —— if there is any leftover.

If you are an ordinary working class individual you will be doing yourself a big favor by voting for Bernie Sanders.
To Mikek: My mother did not raise a fool. Anybody who votes for the CROC, or for Hillary Clinton, or for an establishment Republican, must have a death wish.
 
To Mikek: How do you come up with Eisenhower?
Eisenhower followed FDR's highly successful model by imposing a 91% tax rate on the upper income brackets. That revenue, combined with certain other waste-controlling policies, and by replicating FDR's WPA program, enabled Eisenhower to construct the Interstate Highway System, which employed millions, thereby effecting an FDR-style redistribution of the Nation's wealth resource and further empowered the Middle Class.

I am hoping that, if elected, Bernie Sanders, who is the declared opponent of the banks, Wall Street and the One Percent, will follow the examples of FDR and Eisenhower and rebuild our crumbling Infrastructure. It will employ millions, redistribute the Nation's wealth, create thousands of new industries and put an end to the damage done to this Nation by Reaganomics.

How do you not acknowledge the achievements of FDR and Eisenhower, which resulted in the most successful and productive decades in our history -- the late 40s through to the early 80s, which is when Reagan, the corporatist Puppet, began his deregulation assault on the Middle Class?


(Please pardon the redundant boldface. It is the result of a coding quirk I don't know how to control.)
 
Last edited:
Eisenhower followed FDR's highly successful model by imposing a 91% tax rate on the upper income brackets.
To MikeK: Get your facts straight.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Marginal Tax Rate on Regular Income over $400,000: 92% - 91%

Maximum Tax Rate on Long-Term Capital Gains: 25%

During the administration of Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a 92 percent marginal income tax rate for top earners in the United States remained from the previous administration of Harry S. Truman. At the time, the highest tax bracket was for income over $400,000.

This was nearly the highest tax rate for top earners in the century, just under the 94 percent rate for income over $200,000 instated during World War II under Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency.

In 1954, the 92 percent marginal rate decreased to 91 percent under Eisenhower. The maximum tax on long-term capital gains was 25 percent -- a rate that remained in place for a decade.

From Eisenhower to Obama: What the Wealthiest Americans Pay in Taxes
WPA program, enabled Eisenhower to construct the Interstate Highway System,



To MikeK: Where did you learn that nonsense? Ike’s highways had more to do with retaliating against a Soviet nuclear attack than it had to do with FDR’s disastrous welfare programs. Logistics was Ike’s expertise in the military. Had there been no WPA Eisenhower would still have built the federal highway system from a military perspective. As it turned out, Ike was the right president at the right time.

Notice where the money came from:


The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, popularly known as the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act (Public Law 84-627), was enacted on June 29, 1956, when President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the bill into law. With an original authorization of US$25 billion for the construction of 41,000 miles (66,000 km) of the Interstate Highway System supposedly over a 10-year period, it was the largest public works project in American history through that time.

The addition of the term "Defense" in the Act's title was for two reasons: First, some of the original cost was diverted from defense funds. Secondly, most US Air Force bases have a direct link to the system. The purpose was to provide access in order to defend them during an attack. All of these links were in the original plans, although some, such as Wright Patterson were not connected up in the 1950s, but only somewhat later.

The money for the Interstate Highway and Defense Highways was handled in a Highway Trust Fund that paid for 90 percent of highway construction costs with the states required to pay the remaining 10 percent. It was expected that the money would be generated through new taxes on fuel, automobiles, trucks, and tires. As a matter of practice, the federal portion of the cost of the Interstate Highway System has been paid for by taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel.

Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It will employ millions, redistribute the Nation's wealth, create thousands of new industries and put an end to the damage done to this Nation by Reaganomics.
To MikeK: No it won’t. Democrats plan to use it to increase the size of the parasite class by millions. That is on top of the millions the Affordable Care Act will give tax dollar incomes if it is not repealed.

Pelosi In 2010: ObamaCare Will Create 4 Million Jobs "Almost Immediately"

Research the Chicago sewer rat’s first years in office and you will see that he talked about rebuilding the infrastructure. In truth, he wanted to pour tens of billions into the education industry’s coffers under the pretense of upgrading the highway system. Naturally, teachers’ union would have cut a fat hog in the ass on the one.

Incidentally, American Socialists/Communists realized that equal distribution of wealth does not work; so they created circulation of the wealth with taxation. All of the harm they did to this country was made possible by the tax on income, and they ain’t finished yet. Open-borders is the Democrat party’s most recent disaster. Note that the scum in the White House will pay for his generosity with the labors of productive Americans:


Obama grants 'refugee' status to new wave of migrants
U.N. to pick Central Americans eligible for U.S. welfare
Published: 11 hours ago
Leo Hohmann

Obama grants ‘refugee’ status to new wave of migrants
How do you not acknowledge the achievements of FDR and Eisenhower, which resulted in the most successful and productive decades in our history -- the late 40s through to the early 80s,
To MikeK: Do you ever get anything right?

First, 1938 was the worst year of the Great depression —— that was six years of FDR’s achievements. Gearing up for WWII began the process of recovering.

Second, the most productive years you cite was the bonus for winning WWII. Note that WWII was the last time America declared war. You might also note that there is no bonus engaging in Peace Without Victory wars.

which is when Reagan, the corporatist Puppet, began his deregulation assault on the Middle Class?
To MikeK: Give it up, or distinguish between the private sector middle that Ronald Reagan tried to revitalize, and the government middle class that absorbs the nation’s wealth —— along with surrendering the country’s independence to the sewer rat’s United Nations.
 
He was elected president, twice, in part because America recognizes the lies of the anti-American far right, which Flanders represents.

Right. America prefers the lies of the anti-American far left which Jake represents.
 
He was elected president, twice, in part because America recognizes the lies of the anti-American far right, which Flanders represents.
Right. America prefers the lies of the anti-American far left which Jake represents.
American believed him twice, the ultimate judgment on the far right reactionary lies that Votto and Flanders represent.
 
[...]

To MikeK: Where did you learn that nonsense? Ike’s highways had more to do with retaliating against a Soviet nuclear attack than it had to do with FDR’s disastrous welfare programs.

[...]
Eisenhower's highway construction program had ". . .more to do with retaliating against a Soviet nuclear attack?" Do you mean defending against such a possibility? If so, how does a monumental highway construction project serve that purpose?

It appears your are a cum laude graduate of the Rush Limbaugh Academy of Right-Wing Propaganda. While I must say you are relatively proficient at the craft, in this example you've been somewhat over-confident.

Eisenhower's highway program served two purposes; the creation of a necessary public accommodation and distribution of the Nation's wealth resource via massive employment. In following FDR's example Eisenhower facilitated growth of the Great American Middle Class -- and I watched it happen!

I was born in 1936 -- the height of the Great Depression. At the time we lived in a six-family tenement on Columbia Street on the Brooklyn Waterfront. In 1938 my family was on the verge of being homeless. My father was one of those who were employed by one of FDR's WPA "make-work" programs which rescued us from abject poverty -- and if my parents were alive they would be happy to tell you all about it.

As I grew up I watched the changes taking place. FDR's policies and programs led to redistribution of wealth, which led to demand for products, which led to new industries, more jobs, and growth of the critically important Union Movement, about which I'm sure you have some canned criticism to offer.
 
Eisenhower's highway construction program had ". . .more to do with retaliating against a Soviet nuclear attack?" Do you mean defending against such a possibility?
To MikeK: I meant exactly what I said. They could not name it the National Interstate and Retaliation Highways Act.

You will have to research my messages for responses to the rest of your talking points. I am not going over it every time a liberal preaches FDR the Savior.

Incidentally, CROC is also an acronym for Crazy Old Communist.

CROC (Crazy Old Coot Bernie Sanders)

17ps-sanders-web1.jpg

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/17ps-sanders-web1.jpg?

Mainstreaming Sanders requires whitewashing his radical pro-Communist past. It won’t be easy to do.

If Sanders were vying for a Cabinet post, he’d never pass an FBI background check. There’d be too many subversive red flags popping up in his file. He was a Communist collaborator during the height of the Cold War.​

Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist
By Paul Sperry

http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/
 
The CROC is a Socialist sharpshooter funding a war chest he can use to buy influence after he loses —— if there is any leftover.
The CROC can get tips from his buddy:

"Federal Election Commission regulations allow former Members of Congress to use leftover campaign funds for things like organizing their congressional papers, but spending campaign cash for personal use has long been prohibited."​

Harry Reid Wants to Use $600K of Unspent Campaign Funds for Retirement
Wednesday, 20 Jan 2016 01:21 PM

Harry Reid Wants to Use $600K of Unspent Campaign Funds for Retirement
 
ncidentally, CROC is also an acronym for Crazy Old Communist.
CROC (Crazy Old Coot Bernie Sanders)
CROC appeals to the worst in human nature more than his political philosophy appeals to the intellect. The worst of his supporters will vote for him well-knowing what he is. Every one of those smug little douche bags are confident knowing that Hillary Clinton is Plan B. Joseph Farah is wrong. That is exactly who they will vote for:

Now you know the real Bernie Sanders. What are you going to do about it? And please don’t tell me you’re going to vote for Hillary Clinton.​

But how many know that Nancy Pelosi has been betraying this country since she first went to Congress:

Yet, there’s Bernie Sanders running for president. Nancy Pelosi, another member of these groups, served as speaker of the House until 2011.​

Farah’s informative article will not change one Democrat mind or vote, but it should be read by Americans so they can learn a bit more about the type of people at the top of the Democrat power structure they are facing:

Is Bernie Sanders a communist?
Posted By Joseph Farah On 01/25/2016 @ 7:49 pm

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/is-bernie-sanders-a-communist/
 
Is Bernie Sanders a communist?
No. Bernie Sanders is not a communist.

Socialism is not communism.

Democratic socialism is capitalism with regulations (such as the Glass-Steagall Act that Bill Clinton repealed) which serve the interests of the working class rather than the super-rich.

Unless you are among the One Percent you will be doing yourself a favor by voting for Bernie Sanders.

Sanders hasn't taken a dime from the One Percent. Every other candidate has. Barack Obama was carried into Office by Wall Street money.

Sanders will focus his attention on redistributing this Nation's wealth, a substantial amount of which has been hoarded by One Percenters, the bankers and Wall Streeters. He has his eye on offshore money. For these reasons he represents the only hope remaining for America -- as it once was.

Please do us all a favor and vote for him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top