Pravda: The Communists have won in America with Obama

It's not just American Conservatives saying it, it is Russia, the conservative model Frank and his band of ass lickers of the opulent pine for.

Conservative Russia

People simply do not realize that Russia is a deeply conservative country.

Fiscal policy is buttressed on a low, flat rate of income tax (13%), and there is virtually no social safety net, with spending on unemployment security, medical provision, disability aid, infrastructure, the environment, and urban regeneration far lower, in both absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP, than its G8 contemporaries.

Similarly, military spending is high in comparison — and growing — medical care is available free in theory, but requires private insurance or additional cash payment in practice, and businesses are in reality pretty un-regulated.

If that doesn’t sound to you like a set of policies Newt Gingrich or William F Buckley would support, then you don’t know your dyed in the wool conservatives from your woolly jumper wearing liberals.
Bingo. My last fiance was a communist from the Eastern Bloc. He had first-hand knowledge of what oppression is.

He thinks the Democrats are horrible. He doesn't think too highly of the GOP, either. Seeing the USA this way makes him sad.

Bingo? Communism is an economic system and soviet bloc countries were totalatarian and communist; today they have evolved and are more democratic and socialist yet participate in the market system as opposed to central planning by a central government.
He still lived under Eastern Bloc communism for most of his life. He knows...first hand...what government oppression is. Hell, his father was in the politburo. When the father had to travel, his family was watched even more closely.

Anyway.

That's why he has no respect for the Democrats, and not much more respect for the GOP.
 
Russia recognized that communism was a mistake, so does China. They are both rapidly becoming, or already are, free enterprise countries. So, naturally they recognize obama as a failed communist. Now Pravda is telling the truth and the New York Times is a lying political propaganda rag. Liberals ARE communists. It's their entire share the wealth philosophy. Russia is no longer communist, America is rapidly becoming communist. We are becoming communist because of liberal democrats. It's a total reversal of the situation that existed 40 years ago.

You know I believe you're a not too bright partisan hack, so recognizing how futile this attempt will be I will attempt to educate you.

Russian and China are still TOTALITARIAN states; I hope we remain a democratic republic though I suspect we have turned the corner (thanks to the Robert's Court and CU v. FEC) and are now a Plutocracy. All are POLITICAL systems vis a vis Communism and Capitalism which are economic systems.

As the article pointed out, there is more freedom in Russia than here. We are quickly becoming more of a totalitarian state than Russia ever imagined it would be. Russia put people in prison for what they say, but so do we. We are demanding that children wear tracking chips, Russia never went that far. Russia allows public displays of religion, not so here. We are quickly becoming far more of a totalitarian state than ever existed in Russia even under it's most cruel totalitarian dictator.

The complaint of the liberals is, we aren't totalitarian ENOUGH. Only totalitarianism can provide democrats with the freedom they demand to oppress others. Particularly those others who don't agree with them.
 
Here is a real delusional libertarian. You losers offer nothing of worth, or you would be getting the notice and the votes. You get to hang out but don't ever think you are going to be plaerys. Pravda? Really?
And the illiterate degenerates have taken over. Just look at JakeStarkey, for example.
 
Best part:

Recently, Obama has been re-elected for a 2nd term by an illiterate society and he is ready to continue his lies of less taxes while he raises them. He gives speeches of peace and love in the world while he promotes wars as he did in Egypt, Libya and Syria. He plans his next war is with Iran as he fires or demotes his generals who get in the way.


The dumb shlubs don't even know they've been lied to. But the truth is already starting to hit...elimination of tax deductions for student loan interest, reduction in Pell Grants, increases in student loan origination....

The Youth vote voted to screw itself both in terms of economics and liberty. And they will be paying for their years of higher education indoctrination for the rest of their lives.

Good on you comrade.

Commies don't pay the taxes.

Only capitalist pigs do..
 
Want to give us examples of this Russian "freedom"?

Go live with Putin, bub.
Russia recognized that communism was a mistake, so does China. They are both rapidly becoming, or already are, free enterprise countries. So, naturally they recognize obama as a failed communist. Now Pravda is telling the truth and the New York Times is a lying political propaganda rag. Liberals ARE communists. It's their entire share the wealth philosophy. Russia is no longer communist, America is rapidly becoming communist. We are becoming communist because of liberal democrats. It's a total reversal of the situation that existed 40 years ago.

You know I believe you're a not too bright partisan hack, so recognizing how futile this attempt will be I will attempt to educate you.

Russian and China are still TOTALITARIAN states; I hope we remain a democratic republic though I suspect we have turned the corner (thanks to the Robert's Court and CU v. FEC) and are now a Plutocracy. All are POLITICAL systems vis a vis Communism and Capitalism which are economic systems.

As the article pointed out, there is more freedom in Russia than here. We are quickly becoming more of a totalitarian state than Russia ever imagined it would be. Russia put people in prison for what they say, but so do we. We are demanding that children wear tracking chips, Russia never went that far. Russia allows public displays of religion, not so here. We are quickly becoming far more of a totalitarian state than ever existed in Russia even under it's most cruel totalitarian dictator.

The complaint of the liberals is, we aren't totalitarian ENOUGH. Only totalitarianism can provide democrats with the freedom they demand to oppress others. Particularly those others who don't agree with them.
 
Socialism is a prereq. to communism. Neither are "conservative". Neither are "liberal".

What they really are is LOLberal.

A common mistake is to confuse Socialism, the economic system, with Communism, the political system. Communists are "socialist" in the same way that Republicans are "compassionate conservatives". That is, they give lip service to ideals they have no intention of practicing.

Communism, or "scientific socialism", has very little to do with Marx. Communism was originally envisioned by Marx and Engels as the last stages of their socialist revolution. "The meaning of the word communism shifted after 1917, when Vladimir Lenin and his Bolshevik Party seized power in Russia. The Bolsheviks changed their name to the Communist Party and installed a repressive, single-party regime devoted to the implementation of socialist policies." (quote from Encarta.). Those socialist policies were never implemented.

Whereas Marx saw industrialized workers rising up to take over control of their means of production, the exact opposite happened. Most countries that have gone Communist have been agrarian underdeveloped nations. The prime example is the Soviet Union. The best thing to be said about the October Revolution in 1917 is that the new government was better than the Tsars. The worst thing is that they trusted the wrong people, notably Lenin, to lead this upheaval. The Soviet Union officially abandoned socialism in 1921 when Lenin instituted the New Economic Policy allowing for taxation, local trade, some state capitalism... and extreme profiteering. Later that year, he purged 259,000 from the party membership and therefore purged them from voting (shades of the US election of 2000!) and fewer and fewer people were involved in making decisions.

Socialism vs. Communism
 
Socialism is a prereq. to communism. Neither are "conservative". Neither are "liberal".

What they really are is LOLberal.

A common mistake is to confuse Socialism, the economic system, with Communism, the political system. Communists are "socialist" in the same way that Republicans are "compassionate conservatives". That is, they give lip service to ideals they have no intention of practicing.

Communism, or "scientific socialism", has very little to do with Marx. Communism was originally envisioned by Marx and Engels as the last stages of their socialist revolution. "The meaning of the word communism shifted after 1917, when Vladimir Lenin and his Bolshevik Party seized power in Russia. The Bolsheviks changed their name to the Communist Party and installed a repressive, single-party regime devoted to the implementation of socialist policies." (quote from Encarta.). Those socialist policies were never implemented.

Whereas Marx saw industrialized workers rising up to take over control of their means of production, the exact opposite happened. Most countries that have gone Communist have been agrarian underdeveloped nations. The prime example is the Soviet Union. The best thing to be said about the October Revolution in 1917 is that the new government was better than the Tsars. The worst thing is that they trusted the wrong people, notably Lenin, to lead this upheaval. The Soviet Union officially abandoned socialism in 1921 when Lenin instituted the New Economic Policy allowing for taxation, local trade, some state capitalism... and extreme profiteering. Later that year, he purged 259,000 from the party membership and therefore purged them from voting (shades of the US election of 2000!) and fewer and fewer people were involved in making decisions.
Socialism vs. Communism

:clap2:
 
Communism has its right and left leaning wings, the same as does Democracy. Both are governmental systems.
Socialism is a prereq. to communism. Neither are "conservative". Neither are "liberal".

What they really are is LOLberal.

A common mistake is to confuse Socialism, the economic system, with Communism, the political system. Communists are "socialist" in the same way that Republicans are "compassionate conservatives". That is, they give lip service to ideals they have no intention of practicing.

Communism, or "scientific socialism", has very little to do with Marx. Communism was originally envisioned by Marx and Engels as the last stages of their socialist revolution. "The meaning of the word communism shifted after 1917, when Vladimir Lenin and his Bolshevik Party seized power in Russia. The Bolsheviks changed their name to the Communist Party and installed a repressive, single-party regime devoted to the implementation of socialist policies." (quote from Encarta.). Those socialist policies were never implemented.

Whereas Marx saw industrialized workers rising up to take over control of their means of production, the exact opposite happened. Most countries that have gone Communist have been agrarian underdeveloped nations. The prime example is the Soviet Union. The best thing to be said about the October Revolution in 1917 is that the new government was better than the Tsars. The worst thing is that they trusted the wrong people, notably Lenin, to lead this upheaval. The Soviet Union officially abandoned socialism in 1921 when Lenin instituted the New Economic Policy allowing for taxation, local trade, some state capitalism... and extreme profiteering. Later that year, he purged 259,000 from the party membership and therefore purged them from voting (shades of the US election of 2000!) and fewer and fewer people were involved in making decisions.

Socialism vs. Communism
 
Marx wrote the communist manifesto (well, at least little bits where Engels did not.)

Trying to redefine things based on how they unfolded in history vs. what was suppose to happen is a clear indicator of someone who wishes to try a failed idea just one more time. Next time, they will make it work.
 
Pravda.ru

Pravda.ru is a Russian online tabloid not ashamed to feature woo, denialism, and various conspiracy theories. It also covers "normal" news, but often with a heavy Russian nationalist slant. Pravda means "truth" in Russian, something you probably won't get by surfing on it. The name (and a few former collaborators, apparently) is the sole link with the former Communist newspaper Pravda.

The site is available in Russian, English, Italian, and Portuguese.

Here are some examples of "news" you could find on this site:

  • The Moon landings are a hoax.
  • Global warming is a hoax.
  • HIV is a hoax.
  • Evolution is a hoax.
  • Russia has a HIV vaccine. (Even though it's a hoax.)
  • An alien base was filmed on the moon.
  • A time travel machine was created.
  • America is ready to attack Russia.
  • Nostradamus foresaw World War III in 2010. (Perhaps he saw someone playing Modern Warfare?)
  • Atlantis was discovered under Antarctica.
  • Human and alien skulls were discovered on Mars.
  • Fishermen caught and ate an alien.
  • A young boy called Boris Kipriyanovich is an indigo child and the reincarnation of a Martian.
 
Russia recognized that communism was a mistake, so does China. They are both rapidly becoming, or already are, free enterprise countries. So, naturally they recognize obama as a failed communist. Now Pravda is telling the truth and the New York Times is a lying political propaganda rag. Liberals ARE communists. It's their entire share the wealth philosophy. Russia is no longer communist, America is rapidly becoming communist. We are becoming communist because of liberal democrats. It's a total reversal of the situation that existed 40 years ago.

You know I believe you're a not too bright partisan hack, so recognizing how futile this attempt will be I will attempt to educate you.

Russian and China are still TOTALITARIAN states; I hope we remain a democratic republic though I suspect we have turned the corner (thanks to the Robert's Court and CU v. FEC) and are now a Plutocracy. All are POLITICAL systems vis a vis Communism and Capitalism which are economic systems.

As the article pointed out, there is more freedom in Russia than here. We are quickly becoming more of a totalitarian state than Russia ever imagined it would be. Russia put people in prison for what they say, but so do we. We are demanding that children wear tracking chips, Russia never went that far. Russia allows public displays of religion, not so here. We are quickly becoming far more of a totalitarian state than ever existed in Russia even under it's most cruel totalitarian dictator.

The complaint of the liberals is, we aren't totalitarian ENOUGH. Only totalitarianism can provide democrats with the freedom they demand to oppress others. Particularly those others who don't agree with them.

Neer thought I'd see the day when the GOP Conz champion Russia's fine example of freedom and liberty.

Who is imprisoned for something they said against the Government?

Who is demanding we have a government program to implant all our children with chips to track them with?

Where are public displays of religion outlawed.

How are the Democrats oppressing um, anyone?
 
Does anyone else find it extremely odd that house slave conservatives are citing Russian tabloids lately?

I find it terribly odd that they seem to like Russia, Putin and whole post soviet system on this thread but if the topic was nuclear arms reduction they are our greatest threat and to be feared as enemies. Schizo-servatives.
 
Libertarians and the far right cons have sunk to the depths of desperation.
 
Marx wrote the communist manifesto (well, at least little bits where Engels did not.)

Trying to redefine things based on how they unfolded in history vs. what was suppose to happen is a clear indicator of someone who wishes to try a failed idea just one more time. Next time, they will make it work.

While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians

Well, let's see what Mao thought of liberalism...

What Mao Zedong said about liberalism


mao.jpeg


"Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension.

It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads.

Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung - Combat Liberalism
 
You know I believe you're a not too bright partisan hack, so recognizing how futile this attempt will be I will attempt to educate you.

Russian and China are still TOTALITARIAN states; I hope we remain a democratic republic though I suspect we have turned the corner (thanks to the Robert's Court and CU v. FEC) and are now a Plutocracy. All are POLITICAL systems vis a vis Communism and Capitalism which are economic systems.

As the article pointed out, there is more freedom in Russia than here. We are quickly becoming more of a totalitarian state than Russia ever imagined it would be. Russia put people in prison for what they say, but so do we. We are demanding that children wear tracking chips, Russia never went that far. Russia allows public displays of religion, not so here. We are quickly becoming far more of a totalitarian state than ever existed in Russia even under it's most cruel totalitarian dictator.

The complaint of the liberals is, we aren't totalitarian ENOUGH. Only totalitarianism can provide democrats with the freedom they demand to oppress others. Particularly those others who don't agree with them.

Neer thought I'd see the day when the GOP Conz champion Russia's fine example of freedom and liberty.

Who is imprisoned for something they said against the Government?

Who is demanding we have a government program to implant all our children with chips to track them with?

Where are public displays of religion outlawed.

How are the Democrats oppressing um, anyone?

In post-Soviet Russia the TV still watches you, they have not developed a bit of respect for freedom since the 80s and probably have just as many political prisoners as ever.
 
Does anyone else find it extremely odd that house slave conservatives are citing Russian tabloids lately?

I find it terribly odd that they seem to like Russia, Putin and whole post soviet system on this thread but if the topic was nuclear arms reduction they are our greatest threat and to be feared as enemies. Schizo-servatives.

Seriously man. This is I think the third or fourth thread started by a house slave conservative citing Pravda as the source. I think these people have lost their minds to be jumping into bed with the craziest and more evil elements of the Russian media. I mean did the black guy drive 'em this insane that they now want to jump into bed with who's been this country's mortal enemy and the house slave conservatives' boogeyman for the last several decades? Fucking crazy.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top