Practical Energy Discussion: Bring Back Nuclear To Abate Climate Change

They do? Every nuke plant is run by someone who is ex navy? Really?
You are a very special kind of stupid, aren't you.

Yes, Navy personal that leave or retire from the military apply for jobs, and get them, at our Commercial Nuclear Power Plants.

Where do you think ex-sailors with Nuclear experience go? 7/11 to sell you Slurpees?

Grow the fuck up!

You made a false statement and now you’re upset.
You should probably further develop some maturity.
 
The cost of nuclear is over four times the cost of wind, and over 3 times the cost of stand alone solar. However, it is over 5 times the cost of solar plus storage. And it cannot deliver power tuned as closely to demand as the combination of solar or wind plus storage. Nuclear is really a non-starter today. No reason to build anymore plants and time to retire the old ones as the renewables plus storage are built.

unsubsidized-analysis-certain-100.jpg
 
The cost of nuclear is over four times the cost of wind, and over 3 times the cost of stand alone solar. However, it is over 5 times the cost of solar plus storage. And it cannot deliver power tuned as closely to demand as the combination of solar or wind plus storage. Nuclear is really a non-starter today. No reason to build anymore plants and time to retire the old ones as the renewables plus storage are built.

unsubsidized-analysis-certain-100.jpg
Source, please.
 
The cost of nuclear is over four times the cost of wind, and over 3 times the cost of stand alone solar. However, it is over 5 times the cost of solar plus storage. And it cannot deliver power tuned as closely to demand as the combination of solar or wind plus storage. Nuclear is really a non-starter today. No reason to build anymore plants and time to retire the old ones as the renewables plus storage are built.

unsubsidized-analysis-certain-100.jpg
Source, please.
https://www.lazard.com/media/450784/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-120-vfinal.pdf
 
The cost of nuclear is over four times the cost of wind, and over 3 times the cost of stand alone solar. However, it is over 5 times the cost of solar plus storage. And it cannot deliver power tuned as closely to demand as the combination of solar or wind plus storage. Nuclear is really a non-starter today. No reason to build anymore plants and time to retire the old ones as the renewables plus storage are built.

unsubsidized-analysis-certain-100.jpg
Source, please.
https://www.lazard.com/media/450784/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-120-vfinal.pdf
Thanks. I see a whole lot of "Source: Lazard estimates" in the footnotes.

Self-referential citations are self-referential.
 

Forum List

Back
Top